The animating concept behind the Trump campaign will be chaos. This is what history shows us fascists do when given the chance to participate in democratic political campaigns: They create chaos. They do it because chaos works to their advantage. They revel in it, because they can see how profoundly chaos unnerves democratic-republicans—everyone, that is, whether liberal or conservative, who believes in the basic idea of a representative government that is built around neutral rules. Fascism exists to pulverize neutral rules.

So they campaign with explicit intention to instill a sense of chaos. And then comes the topper: They have the audacity to insist that the only solution to the chaos—that they themselves have either grossly exaggerated or in some cases created!—is to vote for them: “You see, there is nothing but chaos afoot, and only we can restore order!”

  • Mister Neon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    134
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m tired of every election being the most important election. I want politics to be boring again, less evil too if possible.

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If politics were ever boring or less evil, it’s because you weren’t paying attention or engaged. Every upcoming election will always be the most important. Simply because all the others have happened, and the remainder are too far off and nebulous.

      Ask all the people suppressed, attacked, and assassinated in the 50s and 60s fighting for civil rights. All the ones since then too. It didn’t magically become perfect. Or all the people brutalized by robber barons before as they fought for unions, weekends, reasonable hours, and basic safety.

      Being disengaged from politics is a luxury and a privilege that most people can’t afford. Which explains why we’re in such a deficit. With so much of the American population chomping at the bit for fascism again. And much of the rest of the world close behind. Putin in Russia, Orban in Hungary, Milieu in Argentina, etc etc etc. We’ve been asleep at the wheel, enabling the worst people among us.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Republicans are pushing for fascism, and Democrats like not having to do anything but be second worst to fascists.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It might be a few elections before that happens. There’s political turmoil and fascists have a chance so they’re gonna keep going for it until republicans understand they cannot possibly win anything with fascism

    • BoastfulDaedra@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I… I just want to get back to the days when the internet kept our attention with porn and stupid browser games… is that so much to ask!? Is it so terrible to expect congress to be no more exciting and no less humane than any other day at any other workplace??

    • cannache@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah the problem is that wide reaching policy changes is hard to sell on a country wide scale

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Are the Democrats EVER prepared though?

    “I am not a member of any organized political party. I am a Democrat.” - Will Rogers, 1879-1935

    “Democrats never agree on anything, that’s why they’re Democrats. If they agreed with each other, they’d be Republicans.” - Will Rogers, 1879-1935

    • kbal@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      1879-1935

      TIL you guys have been stuck with the same two political parties since the 1850s. No wonder they’ve gone a bit corrupt.

        • EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          35
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          To be fair, no two-party system is a healthy democracy, and the way our elections are designed it’ll stay that way.

          • thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Our election system is generally bad. Elections aren’t controlled by the federal government, even for federal elections, they are run by counties (or whatever the locality calls a county - in Louisiana they are parishes) and each county runs their elections differently unless the state steps in and regulates it. Some states have mail in voting, some make you stand in line on election day. Some counties have FPTP voting, others might have STAR or RCV.

            The only way I see things changing at all are two fold: publicly funded elections with no private money at all AND abandoning FPTP voting for a broader method with an added benefit of potentially eliminating primaries. I know parties would complain, but things would be much more democratic.

            • EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              This is entirely correct. The only way to heal the nation is to take steps forward, not relying on an archaic system that ‘works’ and building out something that actually works.

            • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              We won’t get rid of FPTP or gerrymandering so long as we elect our representatives from geographically defines districts. We should empanel state congressional delegations in statewide elections, rather than by districts.

              In a state with 20 congressional seats, any party that wins at least 5% of the vote should have a seat. A party that wins 10% of the vote should have 2 seats.

          • banneryear1868@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            America’s founders biggest fear were political factions forming. But when they were concerned the voters were all landowning men, how could people with shared economic interests ever form factions?

      • Kalkaline @leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s what happens with a first past the post voting system. A ranked choice would open things up quite a bit, but that would require the people elected by the first past the post voting system to change it or mass revolution.

        Someone call the French and let them know we actually do need them again.

        • hglman@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It must be a proportional system. No other system produces viable 3rd parties.

            • hglman@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Canada has effectively the same system as the UK, both being based on fptp, are you suggesting that fptp is fine in a preliminary system?

              • banneryear1868@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’ve campaigned for an NDP candidate who was against fptp as many of us are, even our current PM ran on replacing fptp which never happened of course… however we have more than 2 “viable” parties despite not having proportional representation. You can apply definitions to “viable” at your will but they have won provinces quite recently and have many seats in federal and provincial government.

          • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It increasingly feels like that’s the single unifying trait holding the democratic party together. That’s the sole reason you see people telling everyone to get out and vote.

            It’s not “We need to get young people to vote because they care about progressive policies, and we can elect a candidate who will align with their views”, it’s “We need to get young people to vote because we can’t let Trump win another term.”

            • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Because it is the only trait. The Democrats know it. As long as they act slightly more progressive they can enjoy massive corporate and AIPAC bribes just like the Republicans do.

              Nothing will change if people vote Democrat this time. In 2028 some other Republican (or Trump again) will run and the Dems will go “Vote for us or we’re going to get Genocided for real this time unlike the other 150 last years whenever a Republican won”

      • banneryear1868@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The Democrats are actually way more internally organized now. About 30 years ago during the 90s both parties reached almost unanimous internal ideological consensus’ and essentially all vote as a single blocks. The state we’re in now with this polarization is part of this, and an example of the increased factionalization of US politics.

        It’s crazy to think how there were staunch segregationist Democrats in to the 70s even as the party as a whole had been (successfully) catering to younger urban demographics that came alongside industrialization. We can’t really imagine something like that occurring now. Even Biden was opposed to bussing and a lot of his “across the aisle” examples even today involve working with segregationist Democrats, not “across the aisle” as we interpret it now.

    • aew360@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I actually like that about the Democrat Party. Shows how ideologically diverse it is because tolerance is a bedrock of the party ever since the two parties switched from being conservative and liberal. The GOP flipped within four years from being neocons to isolationists, and anyone who disagrees with the current identity is a RINO

    • banneryear1868@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      "Ten degrees to the left of center in good times, ten degrees to the right when it affects them personally.’ - Phil Ochs, 1966

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This has been the Republican Party’s M.O. for decades.

    “Government is corrupt and ineffective, elect us and we’ll prove it to you!”

  • huquad@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really wish Biden would step down. I’d love a better option from the Dems. That said, no way in hell am I voting for Trump.

  • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s 11 months for heart disease to do the world a favor and get itself some good PR for once.

  • hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    There is no saving America, there’s only buying time. Democrats can’t do what’s needed to prevent fascism because actually doing something about the Republican party would risk creating actual democracy. Prepare to fight fascism now because at best you’re buying yourself another 4 years. Vote, don’t vote, vote for a third party out of protest, whatever you do organize with other people and prepare for the worst.

    In the best case, I’m wrong and you’ve made new friends. But if you don’t organize now it will be too late to organize in the worst case.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Democrats can’t do what’s needed to prevent fascism because actually doing something about the Republican party would risk creating actual democracy.

      Hard fucking facts. When you look at places where liberals have carte blanche to do whatever they damned well please - your Californias and Washingtons and NYs and Minnesotas - they still can’t bring themselves to do what needs doing. No public health care. Rampant homelessness thanks to commodified housing. Food deserts. Rich-people-only universities. No new mass transit. Police budgets skyrocketing. Everyone kowtowing to tech executives for no discernible benefit.

      Meanwhile, the fascists in Texas and Florida and the Dakotas and Carolinas are creating the future of the American political system while Schumer, Jeffries, and Biden just kinda sleep through it.

      Vote, don’t vote, vote for a third party out of protest, whatever you do organize with other people and prepare for the worst.

      Voting as a panacea for organizing has really fucked the country as a whole. While movement conservatives raid school boards and throw pipe bombs at abortion clinics and do Brooks Brothers Riots and Jan 6ths any time an election is in doubt, liberals have been totally pacified. They show up ever couple of years, pull a lever, do a thoughts and prayers, and go home.

      They spend far more time gambling on Robinhood or working overtime to earn their bosses a bigger paycheck than they do throwing events for their neighborhood or organizing their offices to bargain for a bigger share of company profits.

      The American future looks increasingly grim.

      • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        When voting isnt enough learn how to grow crops like a farmer not a gardener and then practice shooting. If we’re lucky those will stay hobbies.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          learn how to grow crops like a farmer

          Historically, the smart move it own the land and have other people do the reaping and sowing. Even then, agricultural land has skyrocketed in cost as its been commodified. Idk if I’d consider “sharecropper” a savvy career change under and social conditions.

          practice shooting

          At whom? Or is the plan to just shoot everything that moves and hope for the best?

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              If you don’t have enough money to hire people to do farmwork, you sure as hell don’t have enough money to purchase productive farmland.

              • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                No on said to buy a farm. Use what’s available to you and ammend the soil, there are plenty of organic addatives that are free, low cost, or byproducts. Also make you own compost to continually add neutrients, aka grow food like a farmer not a gardener.

                The point is to know how to do it cyclically, with little if any input other than what you create. Its an investment in divesting from society, and a lesson in sufficience that you may need once the fact that China and Bill Gates own the most farmland in America becomes a more pressing issue.

                The guns are there because for any situation where food become that valuable, productive land anywhere becomes a target. Weather its pests, deers, boars, or humans.

                • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Use what’s available to you and ammend the soil

                  A quarter acre of land in my neighborhood runs for $300k. There is nothing I can do to that soil that’s going to justify a $300k upfront investment in urban agriculture. Nevermind what this prepper nonsense is going to accomplish in the event the End of The World isn’t happening within the next five years.

                  a lesson in sufficience that you may need once the fact that China and Bill Gates own the most farmland in America becomes a more pressing issue.

                  The cool thing about farmland is that its only really useful if its being worked. And the realization that we’re ultimately going to have to come to terms with is that the folks who “own” the land are very far removed from the folks who give the land value.

                  At the same time, subsistence farming isn’t a particularly productive lifestyle in a post-industrial world. So telling everyone to run out to Iowa and become soybean farmers is not good financial advice.

    • butterflyattack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      True, that. Building mutually supportive communities is really beneficial if shit goes bad. It’s something most of us can do on a local level and it’s something most humans are pretty good at.

    • hansl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      He’s the incumbent. The last incumbents to not be reelected were Trump and HW Bush. Tell me again why Biden is unelectable.

      • trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        How about we get a president that isn’t over 70 and doesn’t require uppers to function, like biden, or literal adult diapers, like trump.

        Both options are garbage and both men need to retire.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because Biden is a lot closer to HW Bush than he is to Obama. One of the reasons he got the nod in the first place was his promise not to run for re-election. And where we are now is why.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh bullshit he said that once while telling everyone around him that he was a one term president. And he continually referred to himself as a transition president or a stopgap bridge to the next generation.

            The message was received by voters.

            • SwampYankee@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              https://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/11/biden-single-term-082129

              Another top Biden adviser put it this way: “He’s going into this thinking, ‘I want to find a running mate I can turn things over to after four years but if that’s not possible or doesn’t happen then I’ll run for reelection.’ But he’s not going to publicly make a one term pledge.”

              A top Biden adviser said Biden ruled out a one-term pledge when the issue was raised before he even entered the race. “He said it was a nonstarter,” the adviser said, adding that Biden believed it was a “gimmick.”

              In April [2019], when asked whether he would serve just one term, Biden responded, “No.” More recently, Biden has been ambiguous. In October, The Associated Press reported that when “asked whether he would pledge to only serve one term if elected, Biden said he wouldn’t make such a promise but noted he wasn’t necessarily committed to seeking a second term if elected in 2020.”

        • hansl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Last 40 years not good enough? Even with Carter the odds are better for the incumbent.

          • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh it’s not that, it’s just there is so few presidents that didn’t win their second election, and you listed all of them except one particular democrat, is all.

      • GladiusB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        People don’t think he does enough. And “his son”. Basically it’s to just be edgy. Dude has taken a shit show and make it resemble an office again.

  • randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Democrats still don’t know who they will be running against - since the polling needed to determine that are not “likely Iowa caucus goers” but “likely Trump jurors”. We don’t want to be like the Republicans in 2008 who were completely prepared to take on and tear down a Hilary Clinton nominee, only to find themselves fighting Obama.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If the Republican nominee is anyone but Trump, we’ll see Trump run as an independent and split the vote.

      • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Call me a pessimist, not not likely. Trump’s narcissism is only dwarfed by his laziness. If he doesn’t win the nomination, he may still run to try to stay out of jail. But he will absolutely not run if he’s going to be pardoned and protected by a fascist leader of his choosing, and can relax into a kingmaker role with all of the prestige and none of the responsibilities.

      • vividspecter@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Him running from jail while competing against a candidate that isn’t popular with the MAGA nuts, would be the ideal outcome.

  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    A lot of wackos around the world have been winning elections, so we shall see.

  • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wouldn’t be surprised if more vicious rhetoric has been used in past elections, at least one candidate in pre-Civil War America was called a “hermaphrodite”, but the inevitable use of AI is going to make the election an absolute circus. L

  • DaBabyAteMaDingo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Please, for the love of God; if it’s a state where Biden is guaranteed, then vote third party or whatever alternative dumbass you want. If it’s a swing state, it’s your god damned duty to vote for Biden. I don’t like the AID he’s providing Israel but he’s not dropping the fucking bombs.

    We don’t need to spit in the face of our constitution to prove a point. We don’t need to tank the work he’s done getting the country back on track so you can feel morally superior. We don’t need another bad year of COVID just because your friends are saying “Biden bad”. Your friends are retarded and so are you.

    Normally I don’t give a shit what you liberal idiots do but this is seriously going to affect us in the real world. It’s not your reddit and lemmy echo chambers out here so please tighten the fuck up.

    Or tell us of a viable, alternative candidate with over a 90% chance of winning. Oh you don’t have one? Then please shut the fuck up and vote Biden.

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s BIDENS BOMBS being dropped from BIDENS AIRPLANES. The fact that the pilot is israeli would only matter if Biden STOPPED SENDING THEM MORE BOMBS AND AIRPLANES.

      Genocide Joe has got to go!