• ignirtoq@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    Critics, including prominent business leaders, Republicans, and some moderate Democrats, have warned that slapping new taxes on rich people who maintain apartments and townhouses in New York, but don’t consider it their primary home, will just lead the very wealthy to abandon the city.

    Prove it. Show me data where this has ever happened. People talk about the wealthy taking their ball and leaving when taxes like this are suggested, but places like NYC have way more to offer than just low taxes that keep the wealthy there. There’s a lot of room in that cost-benefit analysis for the city to raise taxes.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      They aren’t going anywhere. They love NYC, that’s where all the good shit that a billionaire’s family likes is. If they have to pay a little more, that’s what they’ll do, and scream “New York is too expensive!” like the rest of us have been saying for forever.

    • Yliaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      “capital flight”, I wonder if this has actually ever happened.

      Though even if it does, they could just introduce taxes nation-wide, and then if billionaires leave the country then they can simply do things like making overseas billionaire Americans pay up (they already do stuff like this iirc, just the uber-rich get away with it).

      I’m not sure if them leaving the country would even be a bad thing, since billionaires aren’t the backbone of the economy to begin with, they’re the stain. Good example is how housing price surges are literally always because of the ultra rich.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Even if you have a second home that is not luxurious, you should still be taxed on it.