• aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    140
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    No explanation other than Elon is a thin-skinned little bitch baby who’s carrying water for fascists.

    • ME5SENGER_24@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      101
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      He’s not carrying water for the facists, he IS a fascist and they’re trying to spill that water on everyone in an attempt to undermine people’s freedoms. Fuck him and fuck his kind

        • vexikron@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          And SpaceX. Sorry pretend space nerds, Musk’s company is actually not that great, and none of his rockets will ever go to Mars, due to financing problems, cost overruns, and an insane approach to rocket design.

          Dude thinks he can iterative design rockets like theyre computer programs that can just be deleted and rewritten with the only cost being paying someone to write new code.

          Real, actual engineering does not work this way.

          Not that his approach works for self driving either.

          • Pennomi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Are you stupid? Falcon 9 is the single most used rocket in the world, and it’s not even close.

            Don’t let your hatred force you to ignore facts. Musk is the most colossal asshole on the planet, but that does not invalidate the excellent work done by Shotwell and her team of engineers.

  • Red_October@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Remember back when Elon kept calling himself a Free Speech Absolutist? That just gets funnier every day.

    • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right-wingers only seem to care about free speech when it applies to themselves. Anyone else and they’ll get talking of “defeating the woke mind virus” or whatever ridiculous way they decide to demonize others.

      Reminds me of that Sartre quote

    • ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      it’s funny because even Elon’s ego is a threat to capitalist interests, look how much he’s tanked their company value! Honestly I’m cheering for his self-destructive downward spiral to continue - tw*tter was always a cesspool, decent people should have left years ago.

  • MrSqueezles@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t like that, “leftist”, has become a word used outside conservative circles. It sounds shitty and is as meaningless as, “rightist”.

    • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      From a casual outside (the US) observer it just seems like it’s the price that gets paid in a two party state where there are apparently no centrists. Americans give me the impression that it’s either team Red or team Blue. Does anybody ever say: “I like a bit of this… but I also like a bit of that.”?

      • PopMyCop@iusearchlinux.fyi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, there are some who say that. They get agreed with in person, ignored at the local party/voting level, scoffed at by media, screamed at in general on the internet, and scolded on places like lemmy or reddit (if not screamed at). There are policies that I like that for some reason have to be lumped in with policies I detest no matter which party I look at. One party (fucking GOP) is way worse than the other, but try to have a rational discussion with anonymous or outside-of-your-social-circle people, and any criticisms of a party are like blaspheming their god.

        • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          try to have a rational discussion with anonymous or outside-of-your-social-circle people, and any criticisms of a party are like blaspheming their god.

          That’s because of the nature of anonymous communication. It is literally pointless to try to convince individual people online. They rarely tell you their underlying motivations, and many times reveal that they know nothing about the subject.

        • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah. Succinctly put. I hope things improve, or at least change, at some stage; but as I said in another reply I don’t think the short term prognosis looks too healthy. Best of luck to you.

      • el_abuelo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also doesn’t help that the USA political spectrum consists of “right” and “far right” so while they may call it “left” it’s only left compared to the far right.

        • nickiwest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is something I wish that more people understood. In almost any other democracy in the world, Bernie Sanders is only slightly left of center. On a global scale, US Democrats are a center-right party and US Republicans are a far-right party. There are no successful left-wing politicians in the United States.

        • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Good point. The idea that Bernie Sanders (?) is seen as ultra left wing is incredible to me. Americans would probably spontaneously combust if they got to read some of the left of centre manifestos from relatively normal European parties.

      • thatsux0rz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are plenty of us. The problem is the two party state. Any independent or centrist candidate is going to get drowned out.

        • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          For as long as people like you exist there’s some hope… but I do fear ‘24 won’t be a year of political reconciliation. Perhaps things must get even worse before they improve? Good luck whatever happens.

      • blusterydayve26@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No, the RiNOs were intentionally and specifically hunted to extinction through shame and exclusion. That’s why the name, “Republican in Name Only,” is applied those who don’t embrace the party’s wildest platforms.

        • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Damn. I knew about elephants and donkeys but now I’ve got to read up on rhinos… all jokes aside it looks like polarisation is the problem - which is the two party problem. It must be so frustrating to have views you can’t sensibly talk about objectively with the majority of your peers.

      • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think the cops are useless at best and evil at worst and im pro gun/pro CC, I find that our model of capitalism has failed but I’d rather we revert to the political economic ideas of Henry George rather than Karl Marx. Not that either is possible without violent overhaul most likely. Even just a reframing of capitalism to correct for John Adams era economic fallacies would face nigh impossible resistance from those who have already taken most of the pie.

        So yeah, we exist. It’s just that we tend to get crowded out due to not falling in line with either ideology. I’ve been called everything from RINO to fascist.

        • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I understand someone’s economic views would necessarily push them to one side or the other but what I’ve never understood is why gun ownership is so political in the US. From where I am it just seems sad that there’s people in a first world democracy that “need” to be armed just to go out and buy an ice cream. It blows my mind that more isn’t done by all sides (political, manufacturing and citizens) to lower the body count. Any society where members of the public are indiscriminately gunning each other down surely has a big problem. I have zero problems with fire arms - just their application in the US seems a bit fucked. But, like you said about the police, if your biggest gun-toting gang are that trigger happy and indiscriminate then I can’t really blame everyone else packing as a result. Kind of a chicken and egg situation. Hope it works out for you all one day.

          • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, Im not some “hurr durr both sides are equal” moron. Both sides do have issues, but they’re not equal. The left is on the correct side socially but they often have an incredibly naive view of how the world functions, often operating on “why can’t we all just get along and be rich together?” Levels of fantasy.

            However, the US right is socially authoritarian and wants to oppress anyone who doesn’t fit a christo-fascist perspective, and their economic viewpoint is messed up due to conflation of where wages are derived from. So they fail both sides of the coin whereas progressives only fail on economics.

            If I HAD to take one of two sides I’m going left, because I refuse to abide by people who hate those that are different, and I have a lot of gay and trans friends. However I don’t agree with the lemming philosophy of Auth-Left being the solution to our problems.

              • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Is it really “socialism” if I think the tax burden should fall on the land owners exclusively and the laborers should derive the larger portion of their labor value than the capitalist that simply made their work more efficient with their capital? Due to wages driving from labor value increasing capital?

                We likely wouldn’t even need social safety nets if the capitalists weren’t taking the largest cut on the pretense that wages derive from capital, and the market wasn’t being driven by those with excess wealth.

    • tastysnacks@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      They used to use liberal like it was something to be ashamed of. And I think they thought we were ashamed of it too. They finally figured out we don’t have a problem with calling ourselves liberal, so they came up with a new word.

  • Uglyhead@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This was always going to happen.

    Muskrat bought twitter specifically to make it Parler, GAB, and Truth Social all rolled into one.

    Banning, shadow-banning, or purging any and all dissenting views or content that differs from the Far Right narrative on the sites is the norm.

      • Uglyhead@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That too.

        All the Far Right Authoritarians are just giddy about it all.

    • bloopernova@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can see several motives for him buying twitter.

      Get trump elected, Because:

      a) less taxes for the musky chodelet

      b) less pesky safety and labour regulation for tesla/spacex/neuralink

      c) drop support for Ukraine so he gets a shot at the rare minerals underneath it when russia has full control.

      He’s a useful idiot for trump and putin. Still not sure what the saudi angle is, though.

  • DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Needless to say, just like if r/conservative/conspiracy bans you you’re probably doing something Right, X is just the new, louder, conservative/conspiracy echo chamber, although i still don’t get why everyone senseable hasn’t abandoned the platform yet.

    • PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’ll claim it was an accident or outage, but those accounts weren’t struck at random.

      Internally, is someone curating a list of prominent accounts by political leaning? Are those accounts the target or right wing report bombing? I want to know exactly how those accounts were landed on.

      • PopcornTin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sounds just like old Twitter. Ban someone who you don’t like politically. If it’s causing to much uproar, day it was an accident/glitch. If it works, repeat. If not, repeat in a few weeks.

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a conspiracy and fascism echochamber. No prominent journalists should be there either way