• funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    11 months ago

    in my opinion - and I’m just some guy - there is no humane way to kill anyone who doesn’t want to die. It is a contradiction in terms. Therefore regardless of the method, it is simply “not humane.”

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Fine, then the authors should argue that, honestly, instead of arguing against the particular method and thus dishonestly implying there’s some other method they would find acceptable. It’s a bad-faith “control the conversation” tactic that has no place in legitimate journalism.

      • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        They do (in general) argue against that in the first and last paragraphs of the article where they list (separately) themselves as abolitionists. I believe we can take that as read.

    • Fades@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      By that logic it’s just as inhumane to put someone in prison that doesn’t want to be there, it is simply “not hunane”

      • Jagger2097@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        This is why punitive justice is pointless. We need to rehabilitate criminals, not just warehouse them. Obviously some criminals are harder to rehabilitate and reintroduce into society, but the vast majority of these people are not sociopaths