Why? Is there some law that he has broken and been convicted of breaking and thus officially disqualified from holding federal office? Are the democrats some kind of Amazing Pax Americana party that consistently and measurably increases the quality of life for the vast majority of Americans while also shunning foreign adventurism?
Cause unless those things are true, then it seems quite expected that Trump would run again and have a similar amount of support as he did in 2020.
Yea I wasn’t defending nazis, but glad to see you are using the intent of that law correctly. That is to classify any criticism of the government as “defending nazis.”
If Trump has “similar support” as in 2020 it’s going to be a landslide victory for him.
You conveniently overlooked the part of legislation where they banned “terrorists groups” and group them in with Nazis. Where Terrorists groups are free to be designated at will. So now in Australia, if you say “Palestine will be free from the river to the sea.”, or if you call for the boycot of a genocidal country, the government gets to silence you as if you are a Nazi.
And yet the IDF isn’t on the list of terrorist organizations, so apparently there is some problematic subjectivity with the law as written today, which was exactly my point to begin with. I’d also suggest you ask Turkish Kurds what they think about the Turkish Government.
Why? Is there some law that he has broken and been convicted of breaking and thus officially disqualified from holding federal office? Are the democrats some kind of Amazing Pax Americana party that consistently and measurably increases the quality of life for the vast majority of Americans while also shunning foreign adventurism?
Cause unless those things are true, then it seems quite expected that Trump would run again and have a similar amount of support as he did in 2020.
The 14th amendment doesn’t require someone to be convicted
Removed by mod
Oh, well then I guess I can just declare someone invalid to run for office under the 14th amendment and now it’s true?
deleted by creator
Yea I wasn’t defending nazis, but glad to see you are using the intent of that law correctly. That is to classify any criticism of the government as “defending nazis.”
If Trump has “similar support” as in 2020 it’s going to be a landslide victory for him.
deleted by creator
You conveniently overlooked the part of legislation where they banned “terrorists groups” and group them in with Nazis. Where Terrorists groups are free to be designated at will. So now in Australia, if you say “Palestine will be free from the river to the sea.”, or if you call for the boycot of a genocidal country, the government gets to silence you as if you are a Nazi.
deleted by creator
https://www.nationalsecurity.gov.au/what-australia-is-doing/terrorist-organisations/listed-terrorist-organisations/kurdistan-workers-party-pkk Man sure glad the Marxist Leninist Party that is defending the themselves from genocide on that list.
deleted by creator
And yet the IDF isn’t on the list of terrorist organizations, so apparently there is some problematic subjectivity with the law as written today, which was exactly my point to begin with. I’d also suggest you ask Turkish Kurds what they think about the Turkish Government.