About what are people talking with each other nowadays when anyone can get any information with a quite easy and relatively natural way?
About what are people talking with each other nowadays when anyone can get any information with a quite easy and relatively natural way?
I think I get what you’re trying to say. I’ve often (in the past ~10 years) talked about something I’m going through only to be given terrible advice. It’s always pretty verifiable that it’s terrible, even before we had big LLM models to ask.
On the offhand I’d blindly follow someone’s advice it would usually backfire on me.
So while I think I’m talking about specific interactions it feels like a valid generalization to me.
Yeah, I mean, people share information and explain things to each other. LLMs make those interactions much more accessible and in many cases effective as well. So what is the point of interaction with humans online, for example? Is it the validation that comes from organic human minds?
LLMs tend to be synchophantic and can’t judge or give feedback effectively.
Plus they can fail at tasks as simple as telling me how many kids Queen Victoria had.
They never hold their own line, but cave and bow. Which in turn makes the one inputting to it weaker.