putin is literally a capitalist oligarch (like US leadership) who had good relation with west initially and had been setup there to deepen the roots of capitalism inside the then revolutionary russian society. He completely embodies liberal western world order and his capitalist greed of war and imperialism.
Holy shit this is amazing. Are you a renegade ML or did you all just decide framing it as a capitalism problem was easier than propagandizing NATO by saying they basically forced putin to invade?
Interesting that you differentiate the US and the US in a trenchcoat as two entities. How? Shock doctrine and the cold war. The US tries to place someone more malliable to their benefit in power, and like the rest of them it always ends up biting them back.
While the US certainly does that broadly, Putin is not the beneficiary of such a ploy. That’s one of the few major bad things in global politics that the US did not do.
He didn’t particularly benefit, his trajectory could have been just as productive under the Soviet government. It’s not like he was a total outsider. If anything it might have stalled his political career advancement a few years.
Soviet-style in what ways? Putin is very much a dictator that was placed there by the US
Well that’s a new one. Usually it’s blaming NATO from .ml, but the US installed putin as the leader of Russia? How, and to what end?
putin is literally a capitalist oligarch (like US leadership) who had good relation with west initially and had been setup there to deepen the roots of capitalism inside the then revolutionary russian society. He completely embodies liberal western world order and his capitalist greed of war and imperialism.
Holy shit this is amazing. Are you a renegade ML or did you all just decide framing it as a capitalism problem was easier than propagandizing NATO by saying they basically forced putin to invade?
Interesting that you differentiate the US and the US in a trenchcoat as two entities. How? Shock doctrine and the cold war. The US tries to place someone more malliable to their benefit in power, and like the rest of them it always ends up biting them back.
While the US certainly does that broadly, Putin is not the beneficiary of such a ploy. That’s one of the few major bad things in global politics that the US did not do.
You’re telling me that Putin wasn’t a benefactor of the collapse of the Soviet Union?
He didn’t particularly benefit, his trajectory could have been just as productive under the Soviet government. It’s not like he was a total outsider. If anything it might have stalled his political career advancement a few years.
So the US set off an FSB coup that planted Putin in power did fhey?