Mozilla is unhappy because the use of browser engines other than WebKit will be restricted to the EU, forcing them to develop two different apps.

For an independent browser like Firefox, managing two browsers is not easy, so it can be forgiven that this could be seen as almost harassment.

Also, the fact that the use of browser engines other than WebKit is limited to iOS means that the use of WebKit is still forced on iPadOS, which also increases the effort for Mozilla.

Source: https://iphonewired.com/news/746093/

      • NateNate60@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        138
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s not a solution. It’s a way for you to avoid the problem. It does nothing to help the millions of people who are already deeply invested in the Apple ecosystem.

          • LWD@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            11 months ago

            Not sure if it’s a fallacy if it’s about addressing people who have spent a ton on an ecosystem and can’t just devote more money to buy the alternative and time to figure out the parts that aren’t compatible

            • SupraMario@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              11 months ago

              What parts aren’t compatible? And you can load Linux and Windows on all Mac’s. You can also sell your iPhone and buy an android phone with money left over… getting out of the apple closed ecosystem is cheaper than sticking with it.

              • NateNate60@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                For most people, time is not regarded to be free (i.e. not a cost). As a devoted Linux user, the adage that “Linux is only free if you don’t value your time” is absolutely true.

                  • NateNate60@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Learning Windows is still a time cost. You’re also losing your library of Mac software and quite a few interoperability features between your other Apple products.

              • LWD@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                You can’t refund anything that’s not physical, for one…

                  • LWD@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    You asked what parts aren’t compatible, and one answer is everything bought for Apple computers, iPhones, iPads, etc. Apps, media, anything that isn’t subscription based.

          • NateNate60@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            11 months ago

            No, it’s not a sunk-cost fallacy.

            If you already have a bunch of Apple stuff, it makes more sense to continue using Apple stuff, because switching would cost money and effort. You’d also lose access to the software library that you paid for.

            Having a bunch of Apple stuff also makes buying more Apple stuff in the future a better value proposition because you gain access to features that you wouldn’t otherwise have. Platform lock-in is not a sunk-cost fallacy. You’re just uninformed and being smug about it.

            The sunk cost fallacy only applies when stopping is free or the cost is low enough (in money or effort) that it makes more sense to quit than continue.

        • TWeaK@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          11 months ago

          That is the solution though, always has been. Vote with your wallet.

          • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            32
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yeah, let’s ignore the entire history of labor, environmental, safety, and product regulations, and believe everything is the way it is because of our dogmatic free market feefees.

            • TWeaK@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Lol for a moment there I thought I was going off the rails with my puffa jacket rant above, but your segway into “free market feefees” is far more unhinged.

            • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              free market works when the market is actually free.

              As soon as entry costs are introduced into the market, the free market falls apart.

              Think of the costs of building factories, rnd, lawyers, etc.

            • TWeaK@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              Lol that’s basically the Brave attitude, drown out the controversy with a marketing campaign and pull in more new unsuspecting users than the ones you lose.

          • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            voting with your wallet doesn’t work when most people would buy anyway (whether it’s because they’re ignorant, trapped to do so, etc)

            The minority of people that actually care and know about privacy and software freedom is just a tiny statistic in Apple’s perspective, so voting with your wallet doesn’t work.

            • TWeaK@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              “My actions mean nothing because everyone else won’t do it” is exactly what everyone else is thinking.

              You’re making excuses. Be the change you know should happen. Don’t be a sheep.

              Don’t buy puffa jackets. Seriously. They’re fucking everywhere now. Don’t do it, you don’t need it, they’re cheap and overpriced.

              • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                I’m already taking actions, but I do it with the understanding that it won’t make much of a difference.

                I’m sorry to break your bubble but most people just don’t care. They want their computer to play a video off the internet, and don’t care how long that takes as long as it works. Maybe they’ll care about things in the specific interests they have, but they won’t care about computers, software, and libre software.

                We, people that care about software freedom are a minority and we need to accept that. And the only way to get things done when you’re in the minority is to borrow power from the majority, e.g. by passing legislation.

                • TWeaK@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Most people not caring isn’t a concern of mine. Apple being wealthy isn’t a concern of mine. What concerns me is that the products I use flourish and develop in ways that I like. I don’t use Apple, so I don’t particularly care about them - I just watch the drama from the sidelines.

                  You’re not bursting my bubble in any way, but you are being a little pretentious.

        • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          You cannot root out the evil from within such massive companies. Nvidia still has a stranglehold on the market with CUDA. Literally the only thing one can do is to employ their wallet towards more fruitful endeavours, like donating and purchasing Android in this case. People who are invested into Apple are going to have to face that they made a choice moving away from freedom, even though I understand that staying the odd one out socially isn’t a lot of fun. There’s nothing to be done here unless someone with a lot of money and lawyers sues Apple. Know anyone willing to do that?

        • takeda@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          11 months ago

          Then deinvest?

          What a fucking argument. “Yes, it is a problem, but it is too hard for me to do anything about it, someone else should fix it”

      • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        People should fully own the computers they buy, regardless of which company they buy from.

        This means root access and a replacable primary bootloader, let alone just being able to install apps not on a curated market (what Apple calls sideloading). macOS and Windows both manage to allow root access, and so do certain Android devices (and obviously other OSs as well). Replacable primary bootloaders are more rare, though, especially in ARM devices due to efuse-based secure boot in the CPU that is impossible to turn off. There’s only one phone I can think of that allows for replacing the primary bootloader (Shift 6mq).

        We shouldn’t allow for artificial restrictions placed by corporations on devices they sell, because as we have seen time and time again, companies copy each others’ restrictions, especially Apple. Same goes with game consoles, IoT devices, Smart TVs, etc. And before you mention the potential for piracy, DRM is an artificial restriction placed by corporations, and should also be removed from devices.

        Anything less means that you don’t own the device that you paid for.

        Apple is clearly attempting to comply with the EU DMA in bad faith so that they can maintain as much control over their users and app developers as possible.

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        boycotts barely work, and doubly so when the company has a legion of faithful fanbois and its among the biggest corporations on the planet.

      • M500@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’d like to add that even if you sell apple. The only other alternative is android and they have their own set of issues.

        For me, an iPhone that allows sideloading would be a huge step towards perfect.

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      11 months ago

      And that’s coming from someone who has “applelover” in their username. They fucked up big time by pissing off even their most loyal fans.

      (/j)

      • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        Honestly, I don’t know how many normies this will upset. Pretty much only techies follow this and the people being annoyed by it might just blame the app developer and not Apple. Time will tell

    • sparky@lemmy.federate.cc@lemmy.federate.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      11 months ago

      I mean, this is basically malicious compliance. They did everything in their power to follow the letter but eschew the spirit of the law. Let’s hope the EU has teeth and keeps applying pressure.