• Nefara@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 days ago

      Krita, definitely, though it’s still not as complete in capability it’s a much better analogue

      • black0ut@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Krita is mostly for digital artists and digital painting, while GIMP is more for image editing. They aren’t made for the same purpose, even though both can do simple stuff from both worlds.

          • black0ut@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Yeahhh, I never understood that. It can’t be that difficult to make a circle tool, right?

            To be honest, I don’t know how difficult it would really be, and I know it can be done with plugins. I also know it’s not a tool that you end up using that much with the more advanced workflows (I myself haven’t really needed it in a long time), but it would be nice if we had it.

      • Zwiebel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Isn’t krita for painting and photoshop for photo editing? Does krita do RAW, color grading and such?

    • iocase@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Whenever I open GIMP I always feel like an 18th century taxonomist’s first time seeing a platypus and assuming it’s an elaborate hoax cooked up by someone with far too much time on their hands. Surely this isn’t software made by humans to do useful things!? This must be a joke!