You’re making the same mistake as the guy who got caught.
No AI was used by the court system. The humans in the courts saw an attempt to hack a process that doesn’t exist. Just cause his attempt failed doesn’t mean he doesn’t deserve to get punished.
If you attempt to kill someone, but fail, even if there was no way for it to work, you still go to jail.
We don’t have “justice” systems, we have legal systems
And if the legal system is using “ai” to handle ANYTHING, then they deserve to have their Ai system abused.
Except they weren’t. That’s the point. A human caught it. There was zero AI use.
You’re making the same mistake as the guy who got caught.
No AI was used by the court system. The humans in the courts saw an attempt to hack a process that doesn’t exist. Just cause his attempt failed doesn’t mean he doesn’t deserve to get punished.
If you attempt to kill someone, but fail, even if there was no way for it to work, you still go to jail.
Do they give a noble peace prize for attempted chemistry!
People used to say the same thing about computers.
The two are very much not the same kind of situation, and attempting to conflate them is laughable.
Only laughable to someone who makes being anti-ai their entire personality.
Are you pro ai?
Going from a deterministic model to probabilistic is a huge change, silly goose