Arch is different…

  • insomniac_lemon@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    It’s absolutely true. And that my outdated Arch system is likely still more fresh than Debian.

    That said yeah I would like something that can update itself whenever without breaking*, certainly if it expects me to update frequently. And manual interventions (ideally used for things that actually have a choice/fix, not just what ends up being a pasted command or two) should be a warn-step/update-blocker (depending on situation).

    Though what the image is probably about (2025-12-20, nVidia 10-series turned legacy, legacy driver put onto AUR) is a bad situation in its own right particularly later when the AUR issues started happening. And it is really an update-or-don’t (or get an AMD card somehow) issue.

    Other distros likely do solve the issue of updating, though from what I can see aren’t as good with packaging (dependency handling, lacking optional dependencies) and package availability. Which can be worked around somewhat too, but still needs more trial/input.

    Annoyances are also multiplied for me by having non-fiber internet (also shared).

    * TBC I also mean the act of updating itself (outdated keys etc), not just the outcome