

You mention Raylib in another comment. I can definitely see that for anyone who wants a tilemap/pixel project or small-scope 3D… but even then it’s likely to involve making boilerplate stuff, unless you can lean on libraries (which makes more sense if you know exactly what you’re trying to make).
I’ve really only tinkered with Godot TBH, but lots of things are easy to do in the editor that would be something manual in Raylib. Considering both have bindings capability, Godot makes a lot of sense for the systems it has.
Even with my difficulty I’m not sure what’s “complex” about Godot, I would agree some systems need more work (nobody stepping up, some requests rejected for being ‘too niche’) but that is something else entirely. Is the “complex” part that you want a framework rather than an engine?
Also “competing” is odd when one is free (and easy to run) while the other is trying to screw over its users. I would say it competes as much as it needs to. Any sane game developer probably isn’t attempting to make a questionably-large-scope game. Especially if they can’t even run the questionably-big engine on their hardware.











Does this have any sort of smoothing support?
Then again, I’d probably still prefer like CSG for simpler designs.
I already like textureless models
I’d like to to just use Godot’s gridmap, but I find it to be inflexible (needing multiple gridmaps for multiple cell sizes OR having possibility of double occupancy (particularly with non-1x1x1 cells), no per-cell rotation restriction/disabling etc).
Particularly as I want semi-modular room creation rather than controlling height manually (floors/walls/ceilings made via multiple gridmaps floors) nor do I particularly want to go the other way and create entire rooms as new models.