• dan1101@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 个月前

    I mean sometimes you want to just zone out and play something dumb. You don’t get any gamer credibility but nothing wrong with having fun.

    • Datz@szmer.info
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 个月前

      You’re paying $60 (or is this 70?) for “something dumb”, though. If there’s no passion for it, why buy now? I might buy Sonic 06 for $5 and have a laugh, but at launch there’s no way (even if Wolverine is less “bad” and more “easy”, point still stands)

      • dan1101@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 个月前

        Well not me, I will pay about $5 for a shitty game with good graphics and/or a big open world map to explore.

    • the_q@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 个月前

      Your “just have fun” stance ensures companies make poor quality experiences because people will still buy it. The capitalist love people that just want to zone out.

      • Karjalan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 个月前

        I understand your point but that feels a bit like a zero sum game.

        If people like zone out action games, and those games are made and sell reasonably well, and people enjoy them… Isn’t that fine?

        Yeah maybe it’s shit quality for the amount of money/talent behind it and it could have been better etc… But that feels a bit like people who play every cod version ever complaining about indie games having “bad graphics” or being too hard etc. They’re different games for different audiences.