• riquisimo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    35 minutes ago

    Portable cameras were NOT this good when airlines allowed smoking. You ever see a pic of a ps1/GameCube display at Walmart? This is before THAT.

  • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I mean there’s a huge reason for the loss of luxury on planes that everyone conveniently forgets

    Planes were EXPENSIVE, they were a luxury, and around the latter part of the 80s they figured out how to reduce the price. Tickets went from $500 to $50 for the exact same 1 hour flights to the exact same locations.

      • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 minutes ago

        It’s not just that, they figured out a factory line that made the production cost of planes drastically drop too

        They’re still not cheap to produce, but they went from exorbitantly expensive, might only have 10-25 flights per day to an airport has 1000s of flights per day

    • restingboredface@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Omg yes. I am old enough to remember the tail end of the period when smoking was still allowed on planes and JFC it was awful. They had a smoking “section” but it was still an open cabin so you could smell smoke everywhere. And if you were in the same or next row as a smoker you couldn’t escape it for the whole flight. Flying sucks now, but removing smoking is absolutely an upgrade.

    • clubb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      43 minutes ago

      But they gave you something. This could easily be replaced by some soda, or anything else. Meanwhile, leg room is no more, and you’re only getting your own thoughts to contend with now.

  • Furbag@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    13 hours ago

    People don’t remember that the whole world used to smell like cigarettes.

    Ever go to a casino in Las Vegas? Like that, but everywhere all the time.

    • TRock@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Do they allow smoking inside at Las Vegas? I always wanted to go there. Not anymore if that’s the case

      • Ravenheart@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Even their airport smells like cigarettes. Honestly, the LV airport is the nastiest, dirtiest one I’ve ever seen (and not in a good way, lol)

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Yeah, your not going to find casino floors (with some minimal exceptions) smoke free in Vegas. Chain smoking slot grannies are like a majority of their revenue.

      • Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Not sure, but even if they don’t any more. It might still just smell.

        Can’t get that out easily without ripping up every carpet/fabric.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Dude I’m 26 and got to smell the dying drag of that era. It doesn’t smell nearly as much like cigarettes, at least in my neck of the woods in SoCal don’t know how much the Finns or Franks smoke so mayhaps it’s different elsewhere.

        • dethedrus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I’m a few decades older and grew up in Socal, so I got smoking everywhere (including my mom and aunt at home) and horrendous smog.

          I don’t miss any of that ghastly nonsense.

        • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Not everywhere are people so polite and kind. EVERYONE here lights up. People smoke in cafe’s, I cant eat in a burger place without smoke forcing me to cough.

          They laugh at me for coughing, I’m allergic to the stuff.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            It’s not out of kindness, it’s laws that many cities and states passed in the 00s to ban smoking in various places (and eventually everywhere indoors altogether in most places).

            I think it’s a state and local level thing here though, so it’s going to vary by location. I’m referring to the US if it wasn’t clear.

          • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I think it’s less so a matter of politeness or kindness and moreso because one of the few great projects within the US over the last 50 years was the war on smoking. From the banning of smoking adverts to the anti-smoking PSAs of the late 00s and 2010s there’s been a consistent push against cigarettes specifically, also it’s expensive with high taxes noone has the cash for that.

        • Psythik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I’ve got a dozen years on you and you’re lucky to have only caught the tail end of it. I had to put up with the whole world smelling until I was 18.

          • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Fuck, don’t envy you on that one. I used to work estate sales and holy shit every third house smelt of dust and decades old cigarette smoke, felt like puking the entire time I was working those ones anytime they had a garage I was in there and not the house proper.

  • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Flying was also considered a luxury back then, but yeah keep whining about an generational difference while democracy is torn down around you.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      A flight to France from NYC in 1955 was $310, which is the equivalent of about $3900 today. You can find that same flight for under $300 today.

      Las Vegas to Los Angeles was only $13.70 or $171.88 in today’s money, you can find that for less than $50 today.

      Even if you include the extra fees and everything today that were part of the base fare in the early days of flight, that only adds another 10% or so to the cost.

      The reason that air travel today is so unpleasant is that it has been commodified. Airlines have to compete only on price, and it’s easy to search for the prices. Just 20 years ago it was extremely difficult for anybody except a travel agent to search for airlines prices. Because of that, people often stuck with a favourite airline or with whatever the travel agent recommended. Now, anybody can go to any number of sites and in a few seconds know every airline that flies between two cities with every schedule and every price.

      Since every airline wants to make the sale, they make the price shown by the search the lowest one. Then, to get their profit margin back, they add on fees and make things that used to be built into the price.

      • JingoBingo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The trend is reversing though. Especially on long haul international flights. Airliners are ordering planes with more premium seating and fewer economy seats. Not only does the average margin per passenger increases, but they also have to deal with fewer passengers on the ground which can lower off boarding and on boarding time.

  • fireweed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    145
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    There have been, like, five societal things that have improved since the 90s, and banning smoking in basically all public spaces is one of them.

    I can’t even imagine air travel before the smoking ban. Mega yuck.

    • WizardOfFrobozz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I’ve lived through both eras.

      Take all the tech companies away from the far-right, raise taxes on the wealthy, break up the media monopolies, overturn citizens united, ensure one full-time income can support a small family, restore actual journalism, make universities places for education and research again….

      And you can smoke wherever the fuck you want. Do it in my living room for all I care.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      It wasn’t pleasant. I was a kid and didn’t fly much. but I did experience it.

      Because everyone smoked everywhere, you were at least used to it. Airplanes are super well ventilated, not enough to make it pleasant, but enough that you weren’t feeling like you were going to die when they all lit up.

    • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Also smoking bans are so usa centric. Going to Europe is insane because they are so insanely rude with how they smoke compared to the usa

      • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Not just US. A few years back japan banned it in restaurants (but not bars) and public buildings unless there’s an actual smoking room in them.

      • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Depends where, and sometimes it varies wildly in the same country.

        Hamburg, I didn’t see a single smoker. Berlin, fucking rife with them

      • ITGuyLevi@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I remember flying into Germany in '06 and being able to light up anywhere in the airport, went back in '13 or '14 and they had little booths.

  • myyass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I tried ones similar to these the stevemre way, from Vietnam rations before they got absurdly expensive. They kicked hard like the Ukrainian cigarettes I had, they were both unfiltered. It’s actually kind of funny, the Ukrainian cigarettes inflicted so much pain–I don’t know how my dad smoked them–that I smoked my first cigar like a cigarette thinking this is fine.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      stevemre

      Let’s get that out onto a tray… Nice.

      I fear for his health every time he lights up one of those ancient war ration cigarettes lol

    • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Because the rich want to distract us from the real class war by redirecting anger at old people. Old people who lived in quite possibly the easiest lives with the most generous minimum living conditions and social safety nets that have existed, and were tricked by the rich to give it all up so they’re kids wouldn’t have it, because most of them have brain damage from lead in fuel.

      • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Because the rich want to distract us from the real class war by redirecting anger at old people.

        Part of it is just demographics and survivorship bias. The majority of boomers who are still around are the ones who didn’t have to break their bodies to make a living. The average age of billionaires, senators, and CEO are all in their late 60s, so it’s easy to look at the group and wonder what the hell is wrong with the generation.

        were tricked by the rich to give it all up so they’re kids wouldn’t have it

        I think to accept this as the answer it requires a plastering of cognitive dissonance. The rich themselves are old, they are from the same generation and are the people who voted for trickle down economics and empowered neo conservative policy. I don’t think this generation was tricked, moreso I think they were bribed and were happy to prioritize their own wellbeing over others.

        because most of them have brain damage from lead in fuel.

        This is mostly an artifact of pop science. GenX is actually the generation that was exposed to the highest levels of lead. I think a more important explanation of why boomers are the way they are is simply socioeconomics. They were really the first generation to be fully reared by modernity and the age of the atomic family. Where family units moved away from their extended families to pursue better economic mobility. Meaning instead of being raised by a community of family, they were often raised by an isolated mother, and a father afflicted by suppressed PTSD from war.

    • InputZero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      There are two reasons, one ageism is one of the remaining forms of discrimination that’s still socially permitted, and two some of them deserve it. I don’t know if it’s unsaid or forgotten but most Boomers have way more in common with Gen X, Millennials, Gen Z, Gen Alpha, and Gen Beta because it’s actually a class war. It’s just that the number of boomers in the wealthy classes are disproportionately larger than the other generations. Still most Boomers are not wealthy, they’re just wealthier than younger people.

      Also generations are bullshit. They’re used by politicians and marketers to segmentize the population to make it easier to sell you on voting for them or selling you a product. The real solidarity is in class solidarity.

  • ContriteErudite@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    My stepfather was a lifelong smoker. He smoked a full pack of Marlboro reds every day, and my mom smoked a full pack of menthols. I calculated out how much they spent yearly on cigarettes alone and it came to over $5000, and that was in the late 90’s; it’s probably much higher these days. Both of them had been smoking since the 70’s.

    When I talked to them about quitting, they both said that they enjoyed smoking too much, it’s a stress relief, it’s something to do, etc. They were aware of the health risks, but believed the risks were overblown and that emphysema is an “old person’s” disease.

    Last year he was diagnosed with stage 3 emphysema. The man is a dyed-in-the-wool hard-as-nails army vet boomer, and his obstinate machismo made him ignore years of poor health and lung disease symptoms all to finally end up as an old person with an “old person’s” disease. Credit to him though, he did quit cold turkey the day his doctors delivered the diagnosis; the same obstinacy that pushed him to never give up smoking is what pushed him to quit. Me and my family love the hell out of him, and we’re glad that he finally quit, but it’s so aggravating that there are still so many people out there who discount the risks of smoking.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Every time sometime says they smoke a pack (if not more) a day, it blows my mind.

      That’s twenty cigarettes. I mean Jesus Christ people, like how??

      I’ve never been able to make it through a full cigarette before feeling nauseous and putting it out.

      I’m aware how tolerance works, but 20 cigarettes every day just seems insane to me.

      • dethedrus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        My mom smoked 2 packs a day until at least her mid 40s, after staring at age 10. I have no idea when she stopped because I went almost no contact after moving out at 17.

        She appeared in excellent health until a massive stroke at 77. Barely recovered then died of the flu at 80. This is after years of going vegan and walking 10+ miles per day.

        Mind you, she was antivax, trending heavily towards anti medicine and anti science. As a former very well regarded biochemist.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          39 minutes ago

          It’s almost an impressive feat… To be able to consistently smoke forty cigarettes per day every day, for decades.

    • Sordid_Seraphim@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      19 hours ago

      It’s because there’s also genetics at play. One person can die young doing everything right and another could be like your stepfather and live just about forever.

      Then that gets people think “well how am I different? I’ll be just fine too!”

    • mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 hours ago

      In my country there were ads that showed a smoker who had emphysema as part of an anti-smoking campaign.

      They described it like taking a deep breath and then exhaling just a small puff, then inhaling that puff and repeating forever until you die.

      Sorry for your stepfathers diagnosis.

  • Soapbox@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I read an anecdote somewhere recently that the air in planes during flights has more germs in it now than it did in the smoking days because they had to filter the air so much more because of the smoke.

    No clue if its actually true or not.

    • tazeycrazy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Not sure if it’s the bacteria or just having fresh air cycled though the caben. Apparently it saves the airlines millions as they don’t have to replace filters and the system runs at a reduced capacity. Good to know someone is benefitting

  • protist@retrofed.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Restrictions on in-flight smoking started in '88, when the oldest boomers were 43 and the youngest were 14 24. The Greatest Generation were the ones who smoked like chimneys.

  • Slashme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    “We had it all” is the message some people get from “you could never get away from the bloody cigarette smoke”?

    • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      If you were on a plane they had food you didn’t have to pay an arm and a leg for, they’d even do kosher and vegetarian options. Before that they would just give you something else you usually had to buy. The message is “boomers bitch and moan about how hard they worked when they had it easier than any generation before or since, especially white American boomers-they were handed luxury goods for free!”

      • Jiral@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        No, you did have to pay an arm and a leg before entering the plane instead, and then you couldn’t even opt out of the toxic smoke that OP is finding so great.

        All the post does is glorifying the past, like many boomers also like to do.

  • Akh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Literally everything. You know credit scores were invented by boomers?!

  • forbiddencherry@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Not that it should have to be either or, but I’ll take less leg room over their gross smoke-filled cabin any day.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      23 hours ago

      It’s going to be standing seats before too long. All the airline CEOs have been drooling over those for years.

      • LostListener@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        It’ll probably radically shift to laying down. They’ve wanted to bring this seating arrangement back for a lot longer

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I remember being shown pictures like this in school as a kid and the images have never left my mind.

          Fully crossing a fucking ocean like that.

          Humans are the fucking worst.

        • jaygray91@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I want to punch the person that came up with this idea and forced the engineers to design it

      • plateee@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Do like the standing roller coasters! Then we can just use AI to fly the planes (no need for high cost/high stressed pilots). If the AI flies like shit, everyone is already secured with metal shoulder thingies to keep from flying (pun intended) all over the cabin.

        But how to deal with bathroom breaks? Mandatory catheters! The cost of “sanitizing” between flights surely isn’t that much, and if people refuse - they can be held liable for any accidents.

        /s

        • criticon@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          22 hours ago

          They’ll sometimes hand you a small off brand clorox wipe to clean of the catheter before you use it

  • IndignantIguana@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    23 hours ago

    So now we’re complaining about the enshittification of everything driven by the need to maximize profit in a capitalist system and blaming it on our grandparents? More divisive intergenerational warfare bullshit. If you want to find who to blame for this shit look at the capitalists demanding more and more profit from airlines, manufacturers, literally every part of the economy. It always comes down to class war.

      • BeBopALouie@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Exactly, the 1% love it when its race fighting or blaming boomers or anybody else but them. Sad to see as they keep getting away with it.

    • AFK BRB Chocolate (CA version)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Thank you. I’m always having to point out that boomers haven’t been voting significantly more conservative than liberal, and younger generations haven’t been voting significantly more liberal than conservative. It’s a stereotype, and an incorrect one. In fact, in 2024, GenX voted more conservative than boomers did.

      image

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Am I crazy or does the image you post directly contradict what your comment says? I feel like I’m taking crazy pills.

        Like it almost seems like you got the what the red and blue represent swapped entirely in your mind? Like you’ve somehow read it backwards of something.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      This post misses two aspects: flying used to be an expensive luxury, only, and smoking on flights was fucking disgusting.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      If our grandparents had taken a stand back then and stopped buying shit these corporations would have never gotten so bold. Yeah we should start now (and many are) but we’re in a much worse position than they were.

      • nforminvasion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Gen Z is just as hooked with propaganda and brainrot from social media, if not more so. It’s insane how consumerist the younger generations are, falling for scam after scam, I think it’s peptides now.

        This generational warfare shit is insane. Many boomers are working at Walmart because they don’t have enough to retire and are also getting fucked over. There are plenty of poor, progressive bloomers, just as there are an astounding number of gen z conservatives and red pill bros.

        Let’s admit that no one is immune to propaganda, and unfortunately most people in all generations are quick to fall for right wing bs.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Many boomers are working at Walmart because they don’t have enough to retire and are also getting fucked over

          And then they go and vote straight R. Every time. Religiously.

      • wyrmsbane@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I think its more nuanced than that, you have to remember that we have the internet, while our grandparents did not. Its harder to notice enshittification without it, imo.

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I don’t need to the internet to see the product I’m looking at in the store is of lesser quality or smaller amount than the previous one.

          • wyrmsbane@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Yes, but what about the hundreds or thousands of products you dont keep track of? Anecdotally speaking, I see way more posts online than if I were to go to the store myself. Collective mind is a powerful thing.

    • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Is this really enshittification?

      Prior to the deregulation of the airlines under Carter, the federal government fixed all domestic airfares. Airlines could not compete against each other on price and could only compete on perks. Flying was insanely expensive. NY to LA was $820 in today’s dollars and you couldn’t just shop around airlines for a better price, while you can get the same flight for less than $240 now.

      It’s not like flying got shittier while also getting more expensive. Flying is cheaper than it ever has been. The perks went down, sure. But so did the price. By a LOT.

      • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Not really disagreeing with you, but I was curious if that $240 includes all the crazy fees they tack on now.

          • jtrek@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            21 hours ago

            I feel like it should be expensive because of the externalized costs , but I don’t have any real data for that

            • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              20 hours ago

              They call them “externalized costs” specifically because they can ignore them. Things like pollution don’t cost a firm money in a measurable way unless they’re carbon taxed or something like that.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I mean yeah, but those classes do have some demographics associated with them. The average age of the wealthiest Americans is 65-68, the average age of a CEO is 61, and the average age of a member of the Senate is 66 years old.

      I don’t think that class war precludes intergenerational disputes, it’s hard to completely separate class from culture, and culture from the age of the generation.

      • FishFace@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        How do you know that that’s generational rather than, “it takes some time to accumulate wealth, to rise to the position of CEO, or to build a political career enough to become a senator”?

        • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Because the average age of all those positions have gone up significantly for a single generation. Also a lot of the policy and economic theory that makes up the modern economy were pioneered by boomers like Jack Welch while they were first accumulating power. And there’s supplemental evidence such as the projected lifespans of future generations being smaller than the generations before in the first time in modern history.

          I’m not claiming just being old automatically makes you greedy, just that if you look at culture the baby boomer generation has implemented policy and an economic attitude that is vastly more selfish than any previous generation.