• queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      99
      arrow-down
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      He doesn’t want Xitter to get banned in Russia and there are no consequences for arbitrarily banning people. Pretty obviously just business.

      Wish people would stop using that site.

      Or someone would nationalize it.

      • TheEntity@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        118
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        If he’s being a putin stooge because it’s good for his business, he’s still being a putin stooge.

      • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’d prefer for it to crash and burn, not nationalize it and bail him out of his bad investment.

      • Snapz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        “Just business”

        Are you seriously trying to make the argument that elon “if you advertisers don’t like my performative bootlicking bullshit then go fuck yourself” musk is doing something for the good of a business and NOT because of his vindictive, forever 13 year-old, ultra-divorced, fermented hair plug influenced personal political positions?

        You’re 1000% confusing this coincidentally being a move that might not get him banned in Russia, with that being the core motivation. There’s a disconnect in your comment, last two statements are valid, first is cookoo bananas.

      • Serpentian@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        10 months ago

        He doesn’t want Xitter to get banned in Russia

        Well, It has been blocked for 2 years now. How Do You Like This, Elon Musk?)

      • Red_October@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Honestly nationalizing it would be a bad idea. Once it’s government owned, then the 1st amendment would actually apply and banning people, including the more openly Nazi accounts than you can imagine, would probably be illegal. It would be overrun with even more heinous filth than it houses now.

        It really is best for everyone that Twitter dies, and good news! Under Musk’s incredible zero-win leadership, it looks pretty inevitable!

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Openly Nazi accounts already avoid getting banned so that doesn’t really change anything.

          Though you’re right, we need to pack the Court first and undo right-wing jurisprudence.

        • pingveno@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah, this. Practically speaking the only country that could nationalize Twitter is the US. It’s already a pain in the ass doing moderation without getting the US Constitution in there. It wouldn’t just be the 1st amendment, you might also get lawsuits based on other constitutional protections. I 100% guarantee, the US government does not want to get involved.

      • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Why stop with Xitter? I personally feel like there should be a national equivalent to the corporate search engines, job boards, etc. National alternatives to everything.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        He doesn’t want Xitter to get banned in Russia

        Too bad it already is for last 3 years

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Or someone would nationalize it.

        Oh, the anti-vax broflakes and maga cult will vacate that thing in droves. If the right country ‘owns’ it - thinking Jacinda Ardern’s government if we had a time machine, or just the UN now - then advertisers may come back. Or it may just exist as a cost-free platform for cat pics and tsunami/twister alerts.

        Wait. Isn’t that what we want? No halfwit conspiracy fucknuts, and a still-usable platform? Where do the bots using it for C&C fit into this?

        • hansl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Public spaces should be government owned. Each country could have its own public servers with a guaranteed spot for every citizen. People can cross post.

          If you want anonymity you can have private servers too.

      • Jimbabwe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Putin would never ban X in Russia, are you crazy?

        “Hmm yes, banning my best propaganda tool. This is the move.” - Not Putin

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          Because Musk curates the platform to Russia’s standards. If Xitter didn’t do stuff like suspening Navalny’s wife, Russia might decide to go to a Chinese platform or try to develop their own.

    • boredtortoise@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Banning Starlink from Ukraine but not Russia… Banning Putin’s adversaries… Hmmmmmmm

    • index@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’ll explain it to you really simply: his business are based in america not in russia. He’s also directly involved with the usa government and the usa military.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX#Contracts

      People greedy for money don’t care where their profits come from, given that i still think it’s naive to call him a putin stooge when the majority of his money comes from usa thanks to his links with us government.

      • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        And if he wants to align with the US, why would he ban her, when she’s being a motor against the Russian government, a clear enemy of the US? His actions go against the assumption that he is US aligned.

        • uis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          why would he ban her,

          I think because of ACF. Probably he is tied to corruption in Russia.

        • index@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Well guess what they are not banned anymore. I’ll ask you another question, if the ceo of usa and the ceo of russia telephone him asking for a favor which one do you think would get the priority?