Tribunal vice-chair Eric Regehr said in the latest decision that he was reversing the fine, and that X had a valid defence under a section of the intimate images law that states an internet company is not liable if it “has taken reasonable steps to address the unlawful distribution.”

What a motherfucker

  • tempest@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Since our government and Police agencies country wide actively approve of a system that creates child pornography. Since it’s approved by our government, one wonders if they’re even enforcing those laws at all, and if they are, aren’t they giving a legal out for those caught up in that shit?

  • EmoPolarbear@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 days ago

    Bullshit of the highest order. The image is of a BC resident, BC law should apply. Fuck Musk

  • Reannlegge@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    X should just be shut down, or the tube should be tied coming into Canada. Than Canada should follow the EU rules for charges.