So in a discussion about the big news of today, you are discussing… something that is decidedly not the news of today. Worse yet, in a manner that everyone expects is about the big news of today.
*Actually rereading, it’s even worse. You are mixing and matching news of today with a completely different timeframe without telling anyone.
They break it if they get to 60. We need to get them to over 60.
Around here is where we entered the hypothetical. Generally how an “IF” statement works. I think you’re silly to think we were going to get 60 when the election was yesterday and none of the polls predicted that.
Buh? You need 2/3 vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate to override presidential veto.
I’m assuming when we get 60 DNC that a Republican will not be president. The 2026 election is for the most part already over.
So in a discussion about the big news of today, you are discussing… something that is decidedly not the news of today. Worse yet, in a manner that everyone expects is about the big news of today.
*Actually rereading, it’s even worse. You are mixing and matching news of today with a completely different timeframe without telling anyone.
Around here is where we entered the hypothetical. Generally how an “IF” statement works. I think you’re silly to think we were going to get 60 when the election was yesterday and none of the polls predicted that.