• pjwestin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    A week ago, the difference between the two would have been that Trump would enable Israel in every way, while Biden would enable Israel in every way, but staffers would leak stories about how much Biden didn’t like Netanyahu from time to time. Now, Biden has started sending aid to Gaza while Harris is calling for a ceasefire, and this is entirely because 100K voters in Michigan voted uncommitted. When done properly, threatening to withhold your vote can be an effective way to make your voice heard.

    • hasnt_seen_goonies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think you make a great point, but I would add a caveat. There IS a difference between Biden and trump. One will listen to protesters, and the other won’t. You can pressure Biden and he will change his position because he seems to care what voters think, and Trump doesn’t.

      • pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah, I agree with that. And, to be clear, I think there have always been tons of differences between Biden and Trump on almost every issue besides Israel/Gaza. I was just saying that, on this single issue, the difference between Biden and Trump would have been mostly rhetoric, not policy, up until the Michigan primary voters convinced Biden to change. I definitely didn’t mean to imply they were generally the same.

      • pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah, I’m not saying there’s been enough change, just that there has been some change, and it was brought on by people threatening to withhold their vote.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          it was brought on by people threatening to withhold their vote.

          Its definitely been a wake-up call to the party. Watching Biden shed 20% of Democratic voter turnout in a fucking primary is something. Obama and Clinton never had these kinds of problems in '12 and '96. And guys that did - Carter getting burned by Ted Kennedy in '80 and Bush to Buchanan in '92 - should have been a warning to the party as a whole.

          • pjwestin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yeah, I’ll be honest, I’m very worried about this election. I’m still unhappy with Biden’s approach to Israel, but at least now they can credibly argue that voting for him would be harm reduction for Palestinians. Maybe that will be enough to drive turnout.

    • stinerman [Ohio]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      this is entirely because 100K voters in Michigan voted uncommitted

      Objection. Assumes facts not in evidence.

      To be clear, I have no problem with people in Michigan voting uncommitted, I just don’t think you can draw that line.

      • pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Biden’s entire approach to Isreal changed almost on a dime after that primary. He started aid drops to Gaza, Kamala Harris suddenly started using the word, “ceasefire,” he brought Netanyahu’s chief opponent to discuss the humanitarian crisis in Gaza…Biden obviously didn’t come out and say, “I’m changing my approach to Isreal because I’m afraid of losing Michigan,” but it’s pretty clear why this shift is occurring.

        • stinerman [Ohio]@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s certainly possible. My opinion has long been that politicians are not really all that responsive to public opinion.

          • joenforcer@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            When your representatives are Republicans, that’s pretty much true. My blue representatives actually seem to care and I have first-hand experience with this.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m afraid that there was a near instantaneous shift in his rhetoric after Michigan.

      • thisorthatorwhatever@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        The ‘uncommitted’ voters will think that they changed Biden’s mind, but most likely he was going to start sending aiding to Gaza anyway. He doesn’t like Netanyahu and probably genuinely does want peace.

        At the same time the ‘uncommitted’ stunt has turned voters against Biden. Remember the average voter is functioning at grade 8 or grade 6 level. Educated voters will see this as the political maneuvers that it is, the average ‘grade 6’ mental age voter will think ‘Biden sucks’, and not vote.