A promise to expose a corrupt elite has turned into a perceived cover up, and the powerful online influencers who helped elect Donald Trump are now in open revolt.

  • Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    16 hours ago

    “Trump losing” this and losing that is a bunch of smoke and mirrors. His support will not dip. JFC how many articles, “this time it will be the end of Trump” stfu this is noise, this is not news.

  • kepix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    15 hours ago

    it was quite well known before musk ratted him out. theres like a trillion pictures of him with epstein. also…you know…if all of these made up “trump lost this and that believer” were true, he would have no followers left. yet ice and racism is blooming.

  • vocornflakes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    16 hours ago

    No he’s not. I basically refuse to believe that anyone exists that is capable of walking back their support of Trump.

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Again, it doesn’t matter how popular or unpopular Trump is. He is a “lame duck” President now. He either cannot run again (if the law meant anything at all), or he will have fucked up the election integrity so bad to allow him to run again that nothing about the election will be legitimate and it will be rigged AF. The only ones that need to be worried about popularity are the congressmen and women that are still electable and are supporting his speed run into dictatorship. In 2026, if the elections are not already rigged by then, we have one last chance to remove his cronies and the useless spineless Dems that are standing by while our democracy crumbles. And then those new congresspeople will have an uphill battle fighting back against a mad president and a bought SCOTUS. Otherwise, it doesn’t matter if zero people actually vote for him. Dictatorships dont give a fuck about democracy.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    " . . . and the powerful online influencers who helped elect Donald Trump are now in open revolt."

    Are they, though? Are they really? It’s not a “revolt” if they just go on voting for Trump no matter what.

  • Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    22 hours ago

    must really chap their nips that no matter how many vids they put out about women in their 20’s being “past their prime” they still can’t influence pedophilia into the mainstream

    • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      He’s barely human. I have trouble believing he has conscious thoughts. He acts on animal instinct at the same level as a toddler. He’s basically one of the most failed humans in history

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        He himself said that he hasn’t changed since either 1st grade or kindergarten. He thought he was bragging. He didn’t realize he was telling the truth.

    • ceenote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      I can’t tell if they didn’t expect fallout like this, or if the files are so incriminating, even after redactions, that this fallout is still preferable. We’ll probably never know, but I’d bet on the latter.

      • krashmo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        We’ve known for years that Trump regularly sexually assaults women and has for his whole adult life. What would confirming that he did so on a few more occasions in the 90s change?

        • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          22 hours ago

          We’ve known for years that trump regularly sexually assaults children, too. Trump and Epstein were co-defendants in a case in 2016 that was only dropped because the plaintiff was getting death threats, and being followed and harassed in person by hired goons.

          I can’t copy-paste from pdfs on my phone for some reason, but if you have the stomach for it, pages 4-5 in that case file are especially damning. (NSFW)

  • Zephorah@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Is he? MAGA doesn’t care. I just talked to a MAGA today. It’s press sensationalism and bullshit, to them. I reliably get the parrot of the main byline in play from that MAGA, and that was the word today. They don’t care.

    This reads more like the commondreams, dailybeast, newrepublic, HuffPost headline echo chamber filler that always tell you what you want or expect to hear.

    • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 day ago

      A sample size of one isn’t something you draw conclusions from. That’s just bad science. Now if you said you work somewhere that everyone is a Trump supporter, 50-200 people, and they’re all saying this, then yeah, I’d believe you. But, a sample size of one, come on man.

      • Zephorah@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Fair. But it fits the trend. We’ll see how it goes with others this week.

        I can get no one to admit any iota of criticism towards trump in any conversation. The only thing I’ve heard from the MAGAs is “his social media should be better”, and that’s it. It’s a wall of unity and parroted statements.

        Even the insurrection wasn’t an insurrection, but a few bad players or, my favorite, paid performers, that went too far.

        I’ve yet to hear any MAGA in alignment with these commondreams, newrepublic, dailybeast, HuffPost headlines that try to grab onto what the left wants, or even needs, to hear, since 2016.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Read the Tweets the article is quoting. Do you see a single one criticizing Trump directly, not an underling?

    • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think we have seen that MAGA isn’t one body, that there were the tech-bro MAGA Doge edgelords, and the MAGA who opposed them.

      This is the point in every “successful” movements story where they have won the struggle for power, and start receiving the bounty. And realise that the leadership idea of bounty doesn’t match their expectations.

      Just like a soldier who goes hard for the recruiter’s promises of glory and honour, but realises it’s a life of being an utter bastard, and dying in a pool of their own blood and shit and their friends body parts.

    • aceshigh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      How many people are actually maga? MAGA and r’s share some beleifs and the r’s are starting to realize that their pastry has been taken over by the alt right.

      • Zephorah@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Maybe it’s just my people but it’s die hard republicans who’ve now transferred their affiliation to MAGA because that’s what’s Republican. These are people who parroted all the bylines from Limbaugh when he was alive, and now they do the same with the new pundits.

        Sure, you run into people who were Republican, and now can’t stand the party, but they were moderate already, at least in my experience.

        Republicans are very good at staying tight and repeating the sanctioned dialogue like a chorus line of parrots. None of the transfer to MAGA surprises me.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      This reads more like the commondreams, dailybeast, newrepublic, HuffPost headline echo chamber filler that always tell you what you want or expect to hear.

      Gizmodo isn’t bad, but they’re also kinda known for this among the tech press.

      It’s why they’re still alive I guess…

      • Zephorah@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        The part that makes things feel doomed in a Google search engine enshittification kind of way is when the articles with similar vein headlines read almost verbatim to one another, like everyone is scraping from everyone else instead of doing their own organic work on it.

        But if you only ever doom scroll headlines, which some individuals do, you’ll never catch that pattern.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Pam Bondi invited influencers to the White House and handed them big binders that

    accusing Bondi’s Justice Department of “covering up Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes and murder.

    Time for us to hear from FBI agents.

    Notice the pattern? No one, not one would dare point a finger at where this buck stops: Trump.

    Doing so is engagement suicide. And that’s how they make their living.

    Hence, this headline is total BS. They may be mad, but none, not under any circumstance, would turn on Trump. They literally can’t. They will blame anyone under him first, which is already orthodox.

    • Zirconium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      You’re right cause the conservative subreddit doesn’t dare to say the T word, they just say “both parties are the same” and other centrist takes the moment trump does something they don’t like

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      In a monarchy you can criticize the Prime Minister or any other minister in government, but it’s treason to speak out against the King. If the King does something bad it’s because he got bad advice from the PM. Even the opposition party is called the Loyal Opposition, as you’re meant to maintain loyalty to the King even while expressing opposition to the government.

      Nowadays most monarchies are constitutional and the King’s speeches are written by the Prime Minister so it’s actually correct to criticize the PM for the things the King says.

      It’s interesting how the MAGAs are behaving in exactly the same way people behave in a monarchy. Unfortunately the President isn’t constitutionally limited so King Trump can do whatever he wants.

      I really do think that a constitutional monarchy is better than a republic now. We have people in Canada that also believe that you prove your patriotism by being loyal to a guy that surrounds himself with gold. But they can bow to King Charles and it doesn’t matter because he has no political power. Gotta have a King so the subservient part of the population can feel happy without fucking things up by creating a King that has power.

      • frazorth@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        In a monarchy you can criticize the Prime Minister or any other minister in government, but it’s treason to speak out against the King.

        What?

        The king can go fuck himself.

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Yes it’s also serves as a litmus test to determine whether or not someone has any real problems in their life.

          If you’re upset at the PM about policies, there might be a real issue. If you’re upset at the King because of symbolism, you don’t have any real problems.

  • d00phy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Thing is, they may well be angry with him. The big question is are they angry enough to vote for a DEMOCRAT!? Or to not vote and risk a LIBRUL winning!? I doubt it.