jeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world · 6 months agoLawyers for ‘Rust’ armourer move to get case dismissed after Baldwin trial collapseswww.independent.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square94fedilinkarrow-up1156arrow-down13
arrow-up1153arrow-down1external-linkLawyers for ‘Rust’ armourer move to get case dismissed after Baldwin trial collapseswww.independent.co.ukjeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world · 6 months agomessage-square94fedilink
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down3·6 months agoBut he’s not charged with a crime and will never be in relation to this tragic accident.
minus-squareFuglyDuck@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down8·edit-26 months agoDoesn’t matter. Again, the fact of one’s guilt is immaterial to another’s knowledge of that guilt. One had always been guilty and only found as such by the court. One is not factually innocent, and then suddenly factually guilty. It is a mere presumption.
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down3·6 months agoSo why hasn’t he been convicted of a crime? Seems the law doesn’t find him guilty of anything.
minus-squarecatloaf@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 months agoBecause the prosecution fucked up the legal process.
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·6 months agoBut he’s not guilty, right?
But he’s not charged with a crime and will never be in relation to this tragic accident.
Doesn’t matter.
Again, the fact of one’s guilt is immaterial to another’s knowledge of that guilt. One had always been guilty and only found as such by the court.
One is not factually innocent, and then suddenly factually guilty. It is a mere presumption.
So why hasn’t he been convicted of a crime?
Seems the law doesn’t find him guilty of anything.
Because the prosecution fucked up the legal process.
But he’s not guilty, right?