• Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Considering media industry is one of the biggest industries in the world, I’d think the market is more than sufficient to sustain multiple vendors.

      • Swiss@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Prop firearms are not really consumable items. They are just rented over and over again by production companies from rental companies. And when they break, the rental companies would first repair them before buying new ones. They could be decades old and have been repaired over and over.

        I assume the shitty reliability of prop guns has more to do with their age and how much they are used rather than low manufacturing quality.

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I’d suspect that too, it’s not that hard to make a prop gun, in part because it doesn’t have to have accuracy.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        “The media industry” is everything from a big-budget science fiction film, which uses no conventional-looking weapons at all, to a local newscast, which also doesn’t.

        The number of productions worldwide needing realistic-looking prop weapons is very unlikely going to make any manufacturer justify redesigning their arms or recalibrating their manufacturing equipment, if recalibration is all that is necessary and new equipment wouldn’t also be required.

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          In the 80’s movies were the biggest export of USA. IDK how big exactly it is today, but globally it’s very big.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            I’m not sure why you think that means the market for realistic prop guns is worth the cost of redesign and recalibration and possibly the purchase of new equipment.

            Only a few companies make those movies, so they only need a limited stock of those weapons, especially since they can be reused. Most movies don’t require them.

            Also, I can find absolutely nothing to corroborate your claim that movies were America’s biggest export in the 1980s. They aren’t even in the top 10 now, so I doubt it.

            https://www.evansdist.com/americas-top-10-exports/

            • Buffalox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Maybe it wasn’t movies by itself, but also other entertainment? But for sure neither oil gas or Automobile were very significant exports back then. Also your list look to be goods only and contain zero services. Entertainment is a service, and will NEVER make that list.

              From your link:

              The trade deficit continues to grow in the U.S. due to the heavy reliance on foreign manufacturing.

              But it would also be usable for theater, and TV shows.