On accident

I kind of can’t take people seriously when they say On accident, I don’t know or care if its more or less grammatical, it sounds like a child sputtering in my mind. It should be By accident or accidentally

Tummy

Any adult has zero business saying this lol

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Unless you have a health condition that causes it, morbid obesity is gross. I don’t mean being fat. I’m talking the mom in What’s Eating Gilbert Grape. Also, you shouldn’t need a rascal scooter to shop in Wal-Mart unless you have such a health condition.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      The worst part is understanding the medical definition of morbid obesity. Those of us you’re excusing as “just fat” also clear that bar

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Even health conditions. Yeah some people have issues where they struggle to lose weight, but that alone does not make you 500 pounds.

      Semi-related, people who buy 8 2-liters of diet soda at a time at the grocery store. You just KNOW they don’t touch water.

  • BodePlotHole@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Excusing folks with dyscalculia, those of you who speak proudly and openly about how bad you are at math can die in a fire.

    Functioning adults are expected to read. You should also be able to calculate reasonable numbers and percentages without needing the calculator on your phone to know what 20% is; Or what one half of 3/8 is.

    • fitjazz@lemmyf.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      If someone is speaking proudly of how bad they are at math they most likely didn’t have dyscalculia. Most of us that do have it speak angrily or resignedly about how bad we are at math. What really gets me is when people proudly blame their “dyslexia” for why they are bad at math.

      • Bahalex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Perhaps I was in school before the idea of different learning styles was a thing. I always asked why, or how, things works. I need to understand the why to understand the how…or the how for the why… if that makes sense.

        No, the work sheet doesn’t help, nor the make up work sheet. “That’s just how it is” does not explain anything. I’m bad at math because, beyond basic arithmetic, it’s all gobbledygook to me. Now I get self conscious, freeze up and can’t add simple numbers if put on the spot. So I make self deprecating comments about myself because I have no self esteem. Not that I’m proud of my failure.

    • minyakcurry@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I say openly that I’m bad at math because I cannot, even with intense effort, intuit concepts that are laid out as pure mathematical expressions. Why do graphs have eigenvectors? What does that even look like?!

      • Coconut1233@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Graphs don’t have vectors, spaces do. A space is just an n-dimensional “graph”. Vectors written in columns next to each other are matrices. Matrices can describe transformation of space, and if the transformation is linear (straight lines stay straight) there will be some vectors that stay the same (unaffected by the transformation). These are called eigenvectors.

        • minyakcurry@monyet.cc
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Thanks for the response! Honestly wasn’t expecting any. I understand what you’re saying as a pure student would, but could you explain what you mean by “a space is a just an n-dimensional graph”?

          Would the vertices map to some coordinate in space? Or am I completely misunderstanding.

          • Coconut1233@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I misunderstood a little, I assumed a function graph, which could be R^n space. But for the graph-theory-graphs (sets of vertices and edges) it’s similar, you can model the graph using adjacency matrix (NxN matrix for a graph of N vertices, where the vertices ‘mapped’ to a row and column by index. Usually consisting of real numbers representing distance between the “row” and “column” node) and look at it from the linear algebra point of view. That allows to model some characteristics of the graph. But honestly I haven’t mixed these two fields of maths much, so I hope what I wrote is somewhat understandable.

    • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      So, the way you have phrased this is blatantly ableist. It’s like you’re saying you hate people who are blind because they refuse to learn to read. You’re annoyed with people who CHOOSE not to learn, and attacking other people who have a disability. Don’t use the technical terms for actual disabilities when that’s not what you are talking about. Your friend isn’t “OCD” because they like when things match.

  • thomasloven@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    Difference in temperature cannot be expressed in °C. It’s not 5 °C warmer today than yesterday. It’s 5 K warmer. You can say “five degrees warmer”, but not “five degrees Celsius warmer” or “five Celsius warmer”. “Five Celsius degrees warmer” is also correct, but who’d do that?

    The reason is that the Celsius scale has a fixed offset. If your birthday is in a week, you wouldn’t say it’s “one seventh of January from today”.

    • boyi@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 months ago

      The reason is that the Celsius scale has a fixed offset.

      Can you explain more on this? I still don’t get it.

      As of now, although I am not a man of authority on this subject, I still think temperature difference can be expressed by using celcius simply because the celcius has the same equivalent difference as Kelvin. The difference of the two value of the same unit will still be the same unit.

      First, from here

      Since the standardization of the kelvin in the International System of Units, it has subsequently been redefined in terms of the equivalent fixing points on the Kelvin scale, so that a temperature increment of one degree Celsius is the same as an increment of one kelvin, though numerically the scales differ by an exact offset of 273.15.

      Secondly from here

      The degree Celsius (symbol: °C) can refer to a specific point on the Celsius temperature scale or to a difference or range between two temperatures.

    • myliltoehurts@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      I was not aware of this before and this is probably one of the most pedantic things I’ve heard for a while - great answer.

    • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      You might not say one seventh (sic presumably quarter is meant) of January, but you’d still be correct in every sense (except, again, mathematically) if you did.

      • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        The same applies to Fahrenheit, differences between temperatures in Fahrenheit should be expressed using the Rankine scale.

        • PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I was just making fun, since I disagree anyway.

          It’s awkward as shit, but 7 days January is the same as 7 days July.

  • IronKrill@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    They’re called Lego pieces or just “Lego”, not “Legos”. It is the official way to say it, but more importantly I got used to it while growing up. I would always say “Lego ___”, for instance Lego sets, Lego bricks, Lego pieces: “Pass me the Lego brick.” The only time I would say “Lego” is as a group: “Bring the Lego upstairs.” Everytime I hear “Legos” my eye twitches because it sounds so wrong. Not sure where I picked this up but I will die on this hill.

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      That’s the official recommendation from LEGO as well. I found a piece of paper that mentions this in the box of one of my dad’s old LEGO sets.

      • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        They don’t want their brand to be turned into a generic word. It’s for the same reason Google doesn’t like it if you refer searching the internet as “googling” regardless of which search engine you use.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    One more: Conservatives are mostly less likely to have a higher education, less likely to be financially successful, more likely to be racist, more likely to lack critical thinking skills, less emotionally developed. And then there are the highly educated and rich hate mongers who stir up the rest for their own gains.

    • Rednax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      That is not an opinion though. It is an hypothesis. One that you have enough evidence for to act as if it is true, but not enough evidence to consider it a clear fact.

  • Delphia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Socks and slides is only acceptable footwear for taking the bin to the kerb or checking the mailbox. If you’re wearing them in public I immediately assume you are a classless dumbass and your opinion on anything is irrelevant.

  • Resol van Lemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    I always hated how most people don’t pronounce the first R in “February”. It just sounded kinda weird to me.

    • IronKrill@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      I propose we replace the word entirely to something easier to spell and pronounce, such as “Feby”.

      • tiredofsametab@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        If you’re going to fix the calendar, we should move SEPTember to position 7, OCTober to 8, NOvember to 9, and DECember to 10 where they belong (or just rename them all to be number-based instead of an arbitrary mish-mash of numbers, people (Julius, Augustus, etc.), and so on).

    • NaoPb@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Now you have me paying attention to how I pronounce it. And now either way feels weird. Thanks a lot.

    • TwinTusks@bitforged.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      My childhood friend called her husband “hubby”, shes late 30s, but not white and not overweight. But I do feel a bit weird calling husband “hubby”, I won’t call my wife “wifey”

  • toomanypancakes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think it’s mostly that particularly poor common grammar drives me nuts. Like, there’s no excuse to not know the difference between you’re and your. Once could be a mistake or a typo, but if it’s a pattern of behavior you’re just not trying. Get your shit together. :)

    • meleethecat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      I definitely judge people on grammar and spelling. If you can’t be bothered to learn your native language, then I can’t be bothered to decode your shitty writing.

        • tiredofsametab@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Mistakes like “you’re” vs “your” are generally not made by people learning English as a second language unless they’ve only learned by speaking (in which case, I’d expect all their spelling to be a mess given that English is a mess). Same with “could of” instead of “could’ve”.

  • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    More like pet peeves, and not something I’d lose my sleep over, but they’re hilariously pedantic. I’ll focus on Latin because I’d rather not pick on existing linguistic communities.

    ⟨V⟩ and ⟨U⟩ are not different letters in Latin. Deal with it. The “right” way to use them is like this:

    • Upper case - ⟨V⟩, always
    • Lower case - ⟨u⟩ or ⟨v⟩, pick one, but don’t mix them

    People fāiling to follow the əbove ɑre æs ənnoying æs someone insistently respelling English ⟨A⟩ with rændom junk bāsed on the sound. Like I æm doing now.

    Same deal with ⟨I⟩ vs. ⟨J⟩. J’m not gojng to stop you from dojng so, but you can almost hear my “tsk, tsk, tsk” from a djstance.

    There’s one way to pronounce Latin ⟨C⟩. It’s /k/ (as in “skill”). If you use /tʃ/ (as in “chimp”), /ʃ/ (as in “shampoo”), /ts/ (as in “cats”), /s/ (as in “silly”), you’re doing it wrong. Unless you’re handling Late Latin, but then follow some consistent set of rules dammit, not just “I use Latin like the Church does”.

    “Veni, uidi, uici” is supposed to be pronounced ['we:ni: 'wi:di: wi:ki:]; or roughly “WAY-nee WEE-dee WEE-kee”. Once you pronounce it with random stuff like “vany VD vaitchy”, you’re wrecking all its alliterative appeal.

    Speaking on that, Brutus is an unsung hero for going all stab-stabby against the guy who said the above. A shame that nobody did it against his adoptive child.

  • candybrie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    People who think anyone uses literally to mean figuratively are annoying and too caught up in their crusade to realize their take is idiotic. No one uses it to mean figuratively. People use it to emphasize regardless of the figurative nature of language. It’s semantic drift that happens to most words that mean something similar to “in actuality” (e.g. really, actually). Even in other languages.

    • pathief@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I find if more confusing than annoying, at times. If the emphasizing is getting on the way of being clear, you should maybe use some other way to emphasize it.

      “I’m literally broke” shouldn’t be a statement open to interpretation, in my person opinion. The internet and lack of familiarity with strangers just aggravates the problem.

      • candybrie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah. Dictionaries reflect popular usage. And I think literally has probably been in use in that sense nearly as long as it’s been used to mean something really did happen that way.

  • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    People using “was” when they mean “were”.

    And the classic “should of/could of”.