No it’s fine, it will be place for Bad Liberals content - but with down votes, as the whole content is for “good” Liberals very painful to read, it has meaning only from “bad” Liberals. Otherwise votes from “good - obedient” Liberals will be always negative.
Obediant? Broski conservative traditional values is obidient to the heirarchy in our societies. Social liberalism is by definition built upon tolerance and non-obedience to traditional or archiac heirarchy.
Some young men tend to think they are rebels by rejecting progressivism or tolerance. But all their non-tolerance shows is that they are scared of the people they don’t understand, and feel the need to promote traditional heirarchical values that puts them above those they fear. Or alternatively simply that they don’t have the mental capacity to imagine things another way or to empathise with different types of people.
What kind of stuff do you say that leads to censorship?
What do you mean by censorship?
Some US colleges will fire you if you question the IDF’s treatment of civilians. Elon Musk won’t let you say the word “cis” on his bastion of “free speech” platform. Where are you being censored by “liberals”?
The Twitter Files are a series of releases of select internal Twitter, Inc. documents published from December 2022 through March 2023 on Twitter. CEO Elon Musk gave the documents to journalists Matt Taibbi, Bari Weiss, Lee Fang, and authors Michael Shellenberger, David Zweig and Alex Berenson shortly after he acquired Twitter on October 27, 2022.
Sounds like cherry picking from a person known to not have issues spreading misinformation and AI fakes
You’re right that all their point all bullshit. But allsides is an absolute shit tier source. It’s a poll of internet randos that rates reuters as left wing biased.
This is literally the second paragraoh on the wikipedia page you sent:
After the first set of files was published, various technology and media journalists said that the reported evidence demonstrated little more than Twitter’s policy team struggling with difficult decisions, but resolving such matters swiftly. Some conservatives said that the documents demonstrated what they called Twitter’s liberal bias.
Also yeah. Twitter’s owners used to be centrist (center-left), now they are far-right. No “censorship” in this example.
Fact checking is simply trying to guage the trustworthiness of information. Some fact checkers are shit, just like some news sources are shit. Fact checking is not censorship, if you think scrutiny is censorship, then you’ll have a tough time in life.
Your source is a conservative thinktank with no reputation for trustworthiness. Created by this guy who has worked with the republican party. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Tucker
Yes facebook labeled as misleading some vaccine conspiracies. Is that censorship? It wasn’t removed. Secondly entire governments were pushing disinformation and “keyboard army” to try and discredit vaccines. So there had to be some pushback unless you prefer we are all fed putin propaganda.
Your source is a poorly refered online conservative magazine funded by a far-right think tank. Find me a higher quality source.
Hm, did you read the resources expect for Wikipedia snippets? This is censorship in full scale. So back to my point, first as correct liberal stop with censorship.
Echm, no sure, no censorship. You are always right, others are delusional. How I could forgot, that we are between good, smart liberal brains 🧠 - maybe the name of the community confused me…
No it’s fine, it will be place for Bad Liberals content - but with down votes, as the whole content is for “good” Liberals very painful to read, it has meaning only from “bad” Liberals. Otherwise votes from “good - obedient” Liberals will be always negative.
Obediant? Broski conservative traditional values is obidient to the heirarchy in our societies. Social liberalism is by definition built upon tolerance and non-obedience to traditional or archiac heirarchy.
Some young men tend to think they are rebels by rejecting progressivism or tolerance. But all their non-tolerance shows is that they are scared of the people they don’t understand, and feel the need to promote traditional heirarchical values that puts them above those they fear. Or alternatively simply that they don’t have the mental capacity to imagine things another way or to empathise with different types of people.
First put down the censorship and then we can talk about liberal values 🗽
Censorship is when downvotes
🤡
Who is censoring you?
What kind of stuff do you say that leads to censorship?
What do you mean by censorship?
Some US colleges will fire you if you question the IDF’s treatment of civilians. Elon Musk won’t let you say the word “cis” on his bastion of “free speech” platform. Where are you being censored by “liberals”?
Well, there is many examples:
Sounds like cherry picking from a person known to not have issues spreading misinformation and AI fakes
Between center and leans right
Brownstone is right biased
Leans right
Everyone hates Google for one reason or another
You’re right that all their point all bullshit. But allsides is an absolute shit tier source. It’s a poll of internet randos that rates reuters as left wing biased.
Also yeah. Twitter’s owners used to be centrist (center-left), now they are far-right. No “censorship” in this example.
Fact checking is simply trying to guage the trustworthiness of information. Some fact checkers are shit, just like some news sources are shit. Fact checking is not censorship, if you think scrutiny is censorship, then you’ll have a tough time in life.
Your source is a conservative thinktank with no reputation for trustworthiness. Created by this guy who has worked with the republican party. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Tucker
Yes facebook labeled as misleading some vaccine conspiracies. Is that censorship? It wasn’t removed. Secondly entire governments were pushing disinformation and “keyboard army” to try and discredit vaccines. So there had to be some pushback unless you prefer we are all fed putin propaganda.
Your source is a poorly refered online conservative magazine funded by a far-right think tank. Find me a higher quality source.
Hm, did you read the resources expect for Wikipedia snippets? This is censorship in full scale. So back to my point, first as correct liberal stop with censorship.
I’m censoring you? Lmao your delusional.
Echm, no sure, no censorship. You are always right, others are delusional. How I could forgot, that we are between good, smart liberal brains 🧠 - maybe the name of the community confused me…