First time this happens to me. With a German protonvpn server.

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    961·
    2 months ago

    YouTube doesn’t like VPNs. Harder to track you (and sell/monetize your data) if they can’t tell who you are.

    • Skvlp@lemm.ee
      63·
      2 months ago

      I desperately want a viable alternative to come along. There’s a lot of great content on YouTube, but the platform is increasingly being enshitified.

          • Crashumbc@lemmy.worldEnglish
            21·
            2 months ago

            There’s nothing “disgusting” about nudity. You should shake off those preconceived cultural biases, you’ll be a better person.

            • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
              1·
              2 months ago

              I don’t feel anything abut nudity being posted somewhere and people enjoying it… I just don’t want to see it myself because it’s disgusting for me)

      • pathief@lemmy.world
        12·
        2 months ago

        It’s a gigantic money sink, it’s going to be extremely hard to come up with a profitable (or break even) alternative.

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        11·
        2 months ago

        I agree. We just haven’t gotten to the point quite yet. Where the creators revolt. But that stage should appear somewhat shortly.

      • Scolding7300@lemmy.world
        9·
        2 months ago

        There’s platforms like Nebula that noticed the decline and also wanted to give creators the freedom to create without needing to deal with an ever changing algorithm

        • Skvlp@lemm.ee
          7·
          2 months ago

          I’ve considered Nebula a few times. That could absolutely be the alternative I’m looking for if they keep adding creators and topics and variety.

          • Scolding7300@lemmy.world
            2·
            2 months ago

            They seemingly are adding more creators. At least the ones I’ve followed. I recently just started contacting creators to ask if they’ve even heard of it and willing to contact so ppl can support them that way.

            Patreon is cool but I don’t want to have a subscription for every creator I like and decide on the amount.

            • toastal@lemmy.ml
              3·
              2 months ago

              None of the creators I follow have LiberaPay or crypto as an option either. I don’t want to pay on a proprietary platform.

            • shneancy@lemmy.world
              2·
              2 months ago

              I think patreon recently add an option for creators to make a free tier. Which on one hand could work, but on the other - we’d be constantly bombarded with “to see this video upgrade to the $10 or more tier” which would personally bum me out

            • Skvlp@lemm.ee
              0·
              2 months ago

              Thanks for doing the legwork, I appreciate the initiative :) I’m guessing that I’ll end up with a Nebula subscription, I just haven’t pulled the trigger yet.

                • Skvlp@lemm.ee
                  2·
                  2 months ago

                  Thanks for the offer, but I’ll support them from day one when I decide to subscribe :) I already know that several creators on Nebula make good content.

        • bleistift2@sopuli.xyzEnglish
          4·
          2 months ago

          LIFETIME MEMBERSHIP $300

          I’m inclined to buy that just because it exists. I hate subscription services so, so much!

          This is the best option if you think you’ll use Nebula for more than 5 years.

      • hobbsc@lemmy.sdf.org
        6·
        2 months ago

        Third party app without an account maybe? Freetube on the desktop and newpipe on the phone is what I like to use. There’s stuff like grayjay, tubearchivist, and pinchflat as well. Or just go straight yt-dlp.

      • Peffse@lemmy.world
        44·
        2 months ago

        Youtube does a ton of evil stuff, but this one is more tame. I suspect the VPN was used to bot and got banned, so the sign-in is required to better target where the traffic is allowed to go, instead of blanket banning everybody using the service.

        • kbal@fedia.io
          165·
          2 months ago

          I suspect the VPN was used to bot

          There are plenty of sources, including even in this thread, indicating that that this is not the problem. Quit making excuses for them.

            • kbal@fedia.io
              24·
              2 months ago

              It’s not just you. I’m tired of the whole team of people who are always standing by to bring out similar excuses any time someone decides that in their quest to stop invidious from existing — or whatever google is actually aiming at — it’s acceptable to just mass-block all the VPN users as collateral damage.

              • Peffse@lemmy.world
                7·
                2 months ago

                It’s not an excuse though. It’s right there in the error message.

                Where are people getting the impression I think google is some kind of saint who can do no wrong? I don’t even see the “proof” that is being used to say I’m coming to google’s defense. Just a few anecdotal theories… just like I provided.

                • kbal@fedia.io
                  15·
                  2 months ago

                  Ah, so it’s not you coming up with the stupid excuse that they have legit reasons to think the user might be a nefarious “bot”, you’re just passing along the stupid excuse as you interpret it from the meaningless message direct from Google. That explains where you got the idea that “viewbots” had anything to do with it, I guess.

          • Peffse@lemmy.world
            2·
            2 months ago

            Bot can automate views. It’s why Youtube keeps trying to move towards “engagement”. Comments, likes, etc, all require an account, which is an extra hurdle for bots.

            • umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
              1·
              2 months ago

              Then I will they just doing half the work. They can just get the site account walled for that goal, not a half patch work of blocking VPN users.

    • sheogorath@lemmy.world
      4·
      2 months ago

      I go the other way. My youtube account is used across my family. My recommendation is a fucking mess.

      • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
        7·
        2 months ago

        So, the home page includes Peppa pig videos alongside with gruesome skateboarding accident compilations. Something for everyone!

      • BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world
        1·
        2 months ago

        My wife and I have our own. We use hers for the kid and mine for the dog. So, hers is beauty gurus and baby shark, and mine is Sarah Boone coverage, old computers, and 10 hour videos of squirrels.

  • bruhSoulz@lemmy.mlEnglish
    14·
    2 months ago

    Yea, been having this BIGTIME. Even occurs on grayjay, and pipe apps (newpipe, etc.) Its aggravating. Can’t even download vids either, and the ones u have downloaded are held ransom until u turn it off too 😂 at least in my case. Fuck google.

  • parpol@programming.dev
    14·
    2 months ago

    This is the result of them blocking invidious. They targeted large Datacenter nodes and check for the number of requests from those datacenters that aren’t logged in, and block them until that number meets a certain threshold. This also causes people with VPNs to get this message. The solution is to connect to smaller self-hosted invidious instances or using proxies hosted on normal residential ips.

  • zlatiah@lemmy.world
    12·
    2 months ago

    I don’t believe anyone mentioned this yet so… here goes nothing, there is a suspicion that this is due to A/B testing

    This is a bug report from the Invidious project; this is back in June 6 (so four months ago), but the hoster of a fairly large instance noted a very bizarre error message on the Invidious project…

    Conclusion is that Youtube is very likely rolling out A/B testing of requiring all clients to login before viewing videos

    Refreshing will probably work considering this is most likely result of an A/B test, but unfortunately I don’t see a way of this problem going away

    • mattreb@feddit.it
      1·
      2 months ago

      Invidious public instances have been completely blocked by this, it’s no longer AB testing. IDK exactly what triggers it but, too many requests from the same ip is going to show this now… maybe OP vpn exits with an ip shared by too many…

  • Onihikage@beehaw.orgEnglish
    11·
    2 months ago

    Try clicking the sign in button, then navigating back to the video without actually signing in. Seems to work every time I’ve tried it so far.

    • Rusty@lemmy.caEnglish
      3·
      2 months ago

      Unfortunately NewPipe will not help with that. I get this message in a browser and in NewPipe.

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        3·
        2 months ago

        Have you tried if yt-dlp works? Cuz if that also doesnt, then maybe they actually temporarily blocked your IP?

        I have never gotten this message on yt so cant test it.

        • Rusty@lemmy.caEnglish
          2·
          2 months ago

          Here’s the log from yt-dlp:

          [youtube] Extracting URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kR1buRTIKhk

          [youtube] kR1buRTIKhk: Downloading webpage

          [youtube] kR1buRTIKhk: Downloading ios player API JSON

          [youtube] kR1buRTIKhk: Downloading mweb player API JSON

          ERROR: [youtube] kR1buRTIKhk: Sign in to confirm you’re not a bot. This helps protect our community. Learn more

  • disguised_doge@kbin.earth
    7·
    2 months ago

    Been seeing that a fair bit too lately. Freetube, Grayjay, and Newpipe seem so sometimes get around it, even if the error is in the browser the video will sometimes load in those apps from the same IP. If you get lucky and find a working invidious/piped instance that might work too.

    Otherwise, turning on a VPN and switching between servers will usually eventually lead to a working one. That, and if you’re up for it, check to see if your favorite creators are on places like Peertube, Odysee, or Rumble that don’t block IPs like YouTube does.

  • Chump [he/him]@hexbear.netEnglish
    6·
    2 months ago

    the stupidest thing about this is that I literally am signed into youtube (yeah yeah, I know), and I still get this shit!

  • serenissi@lemmy.world
    4·
    2 months ago

    This can be a soft limit where Youtube limits the connection rate so that artificially inflating view count becomes more costly. There are inexpensive ‘services’ especially in India or Pakistan where you can buy human (like a whole internet cafe) view times to your scam video to make it float in suggestions and to promote a channel.

    I don’t work for youtube so it is just a guess.