Please don’t take this question the wrong way, I am just trying to learn and get the opinions of more people on this subject. I find it interesting.
Please don’t take this question the wrong way, I am just trying to learn and get the opinions of more people on this subject. I find it interesting.
I’d recommend reading Graeber. Stagism is a useful reduction for educational purposes, but beyond that it’s an antiquated understanding of human social development. In abstract I would say that nothing is strictly necessary, there’s an infinite spectrum of ways to be.
Diamat is a good model for understanding social change, it just has to engage with real complexities.