It’s been a long ol time since I’ve known any lesbians well enough to ask such things, but I followed my brain down a weird line of inquiry, and got to wondering about the current state of the art for the gay gals. I guess I had always assumed it was similar to the dynamics of a gay guy relationship, but then I realized that since men have both an input and an output, they can choose, but it’s mechanically a bit different for cis women. Is there any relationship between that, and the slightly more masculine versus feminine flavors? Asking for a friend, who is me. I want to know. Thanks.

  • growsomethinggood ()@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Hi! Not strictly a lesbian here but in a lesbian relationship. Yes, lesbians have top/bottom dynamics typically in the “one doing the action” vs the “one being acted upon” across various different acts. Most switch it up (“vers”), rather than identifying primarily as tops or bottoms. If you are strictly a top or strictly a bottom, you’re described as “stone” as in “stone top” or “stone bottom”.

    Very important that these are completely different roles than dominant/submissive/switch, which are BDSM terms and describe a more psychological aspect of a relationship than the more physical top/bottom/vers.

  • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I suppose this question better than the previous generation’s “So which one of you is the man?”

  • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    A lesbian couple on Twitch got asked who the top and who the bottom was. They said they switched.

    No idea what that means mechanically.

  • Repple (she/her)@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m very much a lesbian and can confirm we are flatlanders. I get left and right, front and back, but top and bottom? Completely foreign concepts.

    Seriously though. It seems to me very popular among young lesbians to talk about tops and bottoms, but I’m a bit older (around 40) and that was never really a thing for me or the people around me.

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Kinda? It kinda permeated in through gay men, trans lesbians, and the kink community and developed a meaning of active partner with a dominant implication. So for example if I go down on my girlfriend before she returns the favor, it probably wouldn’t be called topping. But if I’m three fingers into a pillow princess as she calls me “Miss” you bet your ass that was topping. So it’s definitely more vibes based as versatility is assumed unless otherwise specified (and not being versatile is kinda rare)

    It also can refer to who’s wearing the strap at the moment.

    • stoicmaverick@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Cool. God I love the nomenclature so much. I think I’m just jealous, because we don’t really have any fun terminology over here in Straight Vanilla Land. Explain Pillow Princess immediately.

      Also, while I have you: can you put into words the appeal of a strap-on in a lesbian relationship/encounter? I’m all for it, but It just seems like more work to achieve what you could using your hands, and neither party is usually into dicks anyway. Is it a Dom thing? Better cardio workout?

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah it comes from not having a default script to follow. A pillow princess is a woman, usually femme, who exclusively fills the receptive role in sex with women.

        As the old saying goes: it’s not penises we aren’t attracted to but the dicks they tend to be attached to. Less hostly said though, it’s that the sensation feels good, and it’s completely unrelated to men. In fact I usually forget that straight people don’t tend to see them as unrelated to men as we often do.

        • stoicmaverick@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          The concept of the dildo makes perfect sense. I even buy the premise that a cock shaped fake cock would feel good given the original design specs of Mk.1 Human Vagangus. It’s just that thrusting from the hips is hard work, and while it’s a fantastic butt and ab workout, if i could get the same pleasure from a hand mounted penis, I would be constantly dehydrated. Is it more of an emotional or connection thing than a pragmatic choice?

  • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    You might want to differentiate between Top, Bottom, Switch and Top, Bottom, Versatile, i.e. BDSM vs penetration positions.

    I’d also say that this is less about physiology and more about the individual acceptance of the concept of position.

    Top, Bottom, Versatile is not necessarily a queer thing, since (cis&trans) heterosex can have positions as well. That is to say, not all queer relationships regardless of gender follow the concept of position.

    • stoicmaverick@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s not just a position thing. It’s just that everyone exists either left or right of the center on the spectrum of ‘mostly giver vs mostly receiver/passive’ spectrum. The gay male community has taken to the terms of Top and Bottom to articulate ones usual preferences, and I was just curious if lesbians had come up with a similar canvas, or if it just doesn’t come up as much with them as it does for guys.

  • Alk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I’ve seen people (lesbians) talk about it, so I’m leaning toward “yes they can but not always”, but I cannot give an authoritative answer as I am not a lesbian.

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    Anecdotes okay? If so, read on.

    So, I’m cishetero, but have been involved with gay culture in specific, and broader LGBTQ+ culture generally. I was also a beard multiple times over the years, including for a lesbian couple that ended up being a bit more intimate.

    But, yeah, there’s definitely dynamics with lesbians akin to top and bottom. Afaik, the terminology isn’t used often for lesbians, but it’s there in that regard too. Back in my younger days, an exclusively “top” lesbian was sometimes called a butch, whether or not they were butch in the more common sense if presenting in a more “masculine” manner. And, that was true of “bottom” lesbians being referred to as femme, even when they presented masculine.

    Mind you, there was predominance of butch lesbians being tops in a sexual sense compared to being bottoms. It was fairly unusual to run into the stereotypical butch lesbian and have them not also want to be the more active partner, and even to the extent of not wanting any sexual acts being performed on them at all. By no means a universal thing, but it was common enough that people would be surprised when a butch lesbian wanted to receive head.

    Being masculine presenting or feminine presenting isn’t a reliable predictor of sexual dynamics, but it’s not far off from reliable in my experience. Men and women, not just women. I’d say 8/10, the closer to a generic "masculine"presentation a person is, they’re a top in the bedroom. Mind you, that’s based on people willing to talk about such things fairly casually, which could leave out a ton of people that aren’t that way, but just don’t like talking about their sex lives in a group at work or party or other gathering.

    The best lesbian friend I’ve ever had, that literally saved my life at least twice, was butch as hell. Flannels, boots, truck, went hunting, and mirrored male mannerisms with zero effort. But she was most definitely a bottom sexually. She would complain like hell that everyone wanted her to do all the work, every time, and all she wanted was some hot making out where the other woman was in charge, followed by “my pussy getting ate like a fat kid at a pie eating contest”. She didn’t mind reciprocating, but what made her most happy, most satisfied was being “bottom” in a sexual sense. But, being butch as hell, the women into her tended to assume she was going to be in control and be the active partner exclusively.

    It seemed to me that the butch lesbians had a harder time with being stereotyped sexually than the femme/lipstick lesbians. It wasn’t as big a surprise to people when a feminine presenting lesbian wanted to be the more active party, or to be in charge even from the bottom. Power bottom lesbians exist in the same way laid back tops do, though a bit more frequently from what I’ve seen and heard.

  • Vibi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    You’ll find that in queer culture, there’s not just top/bottom but a wide spectrum to define or describe preferences; I’m sure this all also applies to the BDSM world as well. There’s a variety of tops and bottoms and preferences like Bambi lesbians who don’t want sexual dynamics beyond cuddling and kissing.

    • stoicmaverick@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ya, but why is everyone jumping to BDSM? That’s not what I asked. I’ve never heard the term before, but I feel like “Bambi lesbian” is kinda reinventing the wheel for the sake of a cute name. Isn’t that just a romantic asexual with a gay modifier?

      • psycotica0@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think the reason people are jumping to BDSM community terms is because BDSM people fucking love terms. They’ve got taxonomy for days, and they live to whip it out, so to speak.

      • Repple (she/her)@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Bambi is an old term, older than me. It predates descriptions like homoromantic asexual, so not reinventing the wheel at all

      • juliebean@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        it kind of is, as far as i can tell, or at least it’s adjacent, though the term actually predates modern asexual nomenclature, and the split-attraction model, which didn’t really take off until the internet did. ‘bambi lesbian’ has merely had a resurgence in recent years because it sounds cute as hell.

  • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think in the second half you’re asking whether butches are more likely to be toppy and femmes are more likely to be bottomy.

    I think there’s probably some positive correlation there but butchness and toppiness are distinct concepts.

    • stoicmaverick@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Things about this post:

      1. It’s concise, and address the initial post
      2. I’ve never heard the terms ‘toppy’ or ‘femme’ used in this way, but I’m happy that I have now.
      3. Is ‘Butch’ PC these days? I’m old and can’t keep track.
      4. It has the feeling of being written by a professional Lesbian scientist on their lunch break at work.
      5. I love it.
  • spicy pancake@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    the top is the one who has to go get the electrolyte water from the fridge when you’re both out of breath

  • AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    If you do a little googling it is easy to confirm but there is the sexual definition like you where referring to and then there is just the more general relationship definition which is basically the Top is the more dominate / assertive partner and the bottom is the more passive partner.

    • stoicmaverick@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you “do a little googling” you can confirm anything you want wether it’s true or not. That’s why I came here to ask actual lesbian, and lesbian adjacent people.

      • AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        So you asked a completely unverifiable public forum, full of users with ambiguous alts and user names and expect a BETTER answer?

        You must be new to the internet.

        • stoicmaverick@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          Wow. You sound like the kind of person who picks a fight with a stranger on the internet, declare yourself the winner, goes through their profile to down vote their last hundred posts, and goes to bed at 6am, knowing that you’re the best.

          To address what was only a question in the technical sense, I ask this here, because I like being able to respond to people’s stories, and ask follow-up questions, which I can’t do reading a three year old article on an ad supported medium which was probably written to give to Grandma to explain why her favorite granddaughter never brings any boys over for Thanksgiving.

          Now quit being a jerk.

  • communism@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yes, but less so than with gay men. A lot of lesbians won’t identify as either, since penetrative sex is not super common with lesbians, but there are also some lesbians with a strong preference to either penetrate or be penetrated and not the other way round.