• fl42v@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    That’s an interesting business strategy, I’ll give 'em that

  • Pickle_Jr@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Bikes: a transportation vehicle with health benefits. Ambulance: a transportation vehicle for the unwell.

    Bikes are the natural enemy of the ambulance. A war between the bike clan and the ambulance clan is on the horizon.

      • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It exists

        https://www.emergency-live.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/NHS_bicycle.jpg

        It does not transport people but it is great for places with a lot of traffic to have a first responder on site quickly before an actual ambulance arrives.

  • madthumbs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    “Hoesch estimated to police that he was going 5 mph to 10 mph and said he didn’t think the ambulance was going to turn in front of him.”

    -So he’s illegally passing on the right at an intersection and making assumptions. -Wouldn’t have a case with me on jury.

      • madthumbs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        This was in the US where they drive on the right making a right turn not ‘across traffic’. The picture at the article further shows the positions.

        • grue@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Okay, let me explain it to you: if there are two lanes going in the same direction, you are in the left one, and you turn right, you are turning across traffic (across the right lane going in the same direction as you). That’s what happened here. The fact that there was space to the right of the ambulance for the cyclist to be in means there were effectively two lanes.

          (And don’t try to claim there was only one lane: you conceded that point already when you claimed the cyclist was “illegally passing on the right.” Even an illegal pass doesn’t entitle the vehicle in the left lane to make a right turn across the other vehicle’s path! In order for this collision to be the cyclist’s fault, both vehicles would have had to be in the same lane to begin with, which means there wouldn’t be room for them to be side-by-side and the bike would have hit the back of the ambulance, not be struck by it from the side.)

          • madthumbs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            The picture in the article clearly shows there’s only a right and left lane. There is no room for turning lanes. There’s also no space for a vehicle. Space for a bike doesn’t make it a lane.