• themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    20 days ago

    Depends on the critique. “Joe is a hypocrite for pardoning his son” is reasonable. “Joe proves that it’s normal for politicians to act unethically, therefore criticisms of all unethical behavior are invalidated by the rule of whataboutism” is a transparent defense of Republican corruption.

    • AnneVolin@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      The pretense that the Hunter pardon is the first time that Joe Biden has acted unethically is rich given he’s instrumental in a current genocide that he’s lied repeatedly about.

      Also you know his entire history from being anti-bussing and eulogizing Strom Thurmond then turning around an telling people they aren’t black if they don’t vote for him.

      He’s the best at being part of a big mess, saying that everyone was doing it, then pretending to be the solution, wiping his hands clean and not even rectifying half the damage he’s personally caused.

      Just look at his involvement with finance, war on drugs, Iraq, etc.

      He’s a good retail politician which is why he’s a classic beneficiary of “we didn’t know any better when we were doing this horrible thing but we were the good guys” type shit that Americans love to do.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        I assumed that this meme was just a reference to his latest bullshit. I’m well aware of Biden’s record, and have been a consistent critic of his for my entire adult life. The earliest memory I have becoming aware of him was when he presided over the Anita Hill testimony.

        • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          I have never and will never give the slightest fuck about Hunter Biden.

          I hate that everyone has just given Diamond Joe a pass for pulling an RBG to hand the country back to Trump. Whatever else Democrats might have done differently, the single biggest campaign mistake is that the Cryptkeeper stomped on our primaries and wouldn’t hand over power until the last minute.

          The entire goal of his presidency should have been anointing of a successor. I’m not a huge Kamala fan, but he could have set her up for success instead of waiting. Whoever won real primaries would run a much better general election campaign than Kamala could have this year.

          • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 days ago

            I agree. If the aim was to avoid a primary, he should have stepped down two years ago and given Kamala a chance to establish a track record as the incumbent president. I don’t like either of them, but anything is better than a rapist, insurrectionist, kleptocratic felon.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        20 days ago

        Yeah, there’s a reason for that. One has motives outside of the current situation.

    • Blastboom Strice@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      Is this why such posts get so downvoted? Do people on lemmy really think that those posters defend the other party?

      Aren’t we (the users of lemmy) supposed to lean vaguely on the left by a large factor?😅

      When I see posts like this one here, I just get frustrated to see that guy using his mighty power for this, when the US is about to sink further into fascism, harming many many people in the process.

      I don’t even really care that much that he lied in the past that he wouldnt pardon his son, I just get angry to see that of all things that he could do in this very critical time he has, he’s essentially securing his family while he is peacefully letting the country and its people sink. It just kinda verifies it once again that they don’t care much about the people, losing the elections for them it meant that they might have reduced profits.

      I get that people would react badly on such post during the election, cuz they could allow the fascists to win, but the elections are now over, the results can’t change very much.😅

      Doesn’t the majority of the people here see it as I do?

      Disclosure: I’m Greek :)

    • smackjack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      I hate this discourse that what Joe did is okay because Trump did something similar. Trump did a lot of horrible things. That doesn’t make it okay for the next schmuck to come along and do the same thing. Two wrongs don’t make a right. I shouldn’t have to explain this to people.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        I don’t think it’s OK, but I think it was entirely expected. I agree that his prosecution was political, and that most other defendants would have gotten much less focus. I also agree that he broke the law and should serve his time.

        Ultimately, our entire system is corrupt and we should do something to fix it. Sadly, we’ll have to wait at least two years for the next election to hopefully at least take back the House and/or Senate. But even if Dems take both, nobody seems to be interested in actually addressing the injustice baked into our government.

        • smackjack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          19 days ago

          There needs to be a constitutional amendment that says that presidents can’t pardon themselves, family members, or anyone that worked for them.

  • inv3r510n@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    20 days ago

    Don’t forget being called a tankie for daring to rightfully criticize the democrats for being the frauds they are.

    • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      20 days ago

      Leading up to the election? Very reasonable. The Democrats are frauds, but they’re not as bad for the left as Republicans. It’s in our best interest to big tent with them for damage mitigation, to prevent the fascists from gaining power. Criticism, however deserved, helps the fascists.

      After the election? Have at 'em. They’re not as terrible as the Republicans, but they’re awful nonetheless.

      • Red5@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        20 days ago

        “Big tent” with people who will give you nothing for your vote. There is a slight chance that they will not take as much away or maybe just not as fast, but they won’t make any meaningful changes.

      • MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 days ago

        Since when did fascists need an election to gain power and whose support gave them that power?

        What you really got there is a big old tent of fucking fascists collaborators, which means from a practical standpoint, you’ve got a big tent full of fucking fascists. Those criticisms are the calls warning you that they will do nothing to stop the rise of fascism and, worse yet, are actively aiding its rise by stamping out any competition to their rule that will show strong opposition to fascism. These are warning calls that echo the realities of our history and you should heed them! Germany is not the only example mirroring this path.

        If you really want to dig a bit deeper into motivations, the Democrats will and have always supported right wingers over the left because they have more in common with the fascists than actual leftist movements. They are far more threatening than the Republicans simply in that they pretend they aren’t also right-wing and swindle people into acting against their own class interests.

        People see the fascist without the mask, but it’s much harder for them to recognize the monster when it instead smiles at them and removes the mask slowly.

      • zbyte64@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        Having a big tent isn’t winning the election. They need to be offering seats at the table.

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          20 days ago

          Big tents absolutely win elections, that’s really the only thing that does. Seats at the table are incentives to get people in the tent. But if they don’t get the votes , they don’t get the table, and any seats they offer are worthless.

          You put me in a room with Democratic party leadership, and I’ll tear into them with all the rightful criticism they deserve. You put me in a room with voters, before the election, I will sing their praises. I’ll advocate their victories and downplay their flaws.

          Not because the victories are substantial, and certainly not because their flaws aren’t terrible. But there are two tents big enough to win the office, and the other one is worse and backed by lockstep support.

            • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              19 days ago

              A little, but they lost many many votes by shutting out any pro-Palestinian voices from the DNC. They wouldn’t even let Palestinian-Americans endorse Harris at the convention, let alone talk about Palestinians suffering (but they stacked the convention with Israeli-Americans and families of hostages).

            • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              19 days ago

              Liz Cheney represents conservatives who don’t want to vote for Trump. That demographic represents more votes than leftists. That’s what happens when you play hard to get too hard, the person you’re after gives up and goes after someone else.

                • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  19 days ago

                  Just because it wasn’t successful doesn’t mean it wasn’t the rational choice. It’s very possible that she would have done worse if she hadn’t courted conservatives, and possible she would have done even worse than that if she’d gone full tilt toward progressives. Hindsight is easy.

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          Very false. They both represent capital yes, but one is objectively more opposed to leftist policy than the other. Republicans are more anti-Union, more against single payer healthcare, etc.

          Voting isn’t about choosing who best represents you, that person isn’t going to win. Voting is about choosing who you’re going to be fighting for the next 4 years. I’d rather push left against the Democrats than the Republicans.

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 days ago

            You’re confusing social reforms with genuine Leftist movement. Both the Dems and the Reps are thoroughly anti-Leftist, and neither can be worked with along Leftist lines.

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                19 days ago

                You specifically mentioned policies like “single payer healthcare,” not the establishment of Socialism. How do you get these policies without establishing Socialism? By trying to use the existing system and parties in it, however futile that may be. Hence why Leftists focus on establishing Socialism, and why the Dems and Reps are equally hostile to Leftists.

                • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  19 days ago

                  If you can’t tell the difference between bad and worse, I can’t help you. They’re both hostile to the left, but only one is also hostile to the center.

                  I believe if leftists actually started showing up, and petitioned the Democrats for charge, they might get some meager nominal concessions. The Republicans not only won’t do that, they’ll double down on authoritarianism.

                  The very same tepid institutionalism that prevents them from boldly accomplishing anything is exactly what makes them a more favorable enemy. Republicans don’t care about the institutions at all, they’ll install a Christo-fascist ethnostate the exact moment they have the opportunity. I’d rather fight neoliberals than Christo-fascists, and I’m not sure why you wouldn’t.

                  But go ahead, don’t vote strategically to support an easier-to-defeat enemy. I’m sure playing on hard mode will establish socialism faster.

        • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          If you think one genocide is just as bad as 3, when the difference is millions of lives, then you have no heart.

          Drag gets it, okay? “Just as bad” is a great soundbite. It gets people riled up and ready to take action. But it’s also false, because it erases millions of genocide victims. And drag wants to know whether you’ve thought about the millions of genocide victims you’re erasing to accomplish your goals. Has it not crossed your mind yet, or did you make a conscious choice to use genocide-denying rhetoric?

      • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        you committed a genocide; you are a fascist. shut the fuck up ‘those guys are fascists’ you are literally the same

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 days ago

          I didn’t do shit. The unwavering support of Israel is the natural extension of the exact same foreign policy we’ve adopted since Israel was founded. And don’t pretend it’s magically gonna get better now that Dems lost. Talk to Palestinians, they’re terrified of Trump’s bromance with Bibi.

          Both parties are the enemy. Democrats are an easier to defeat enemy. Why would you want to fight the harder enemy? The odds are already stacked against the left, why make them worse?

          • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            19 days ago

            I didn’t do shit. The Palestinian genocide is a built in feature of both parties. I support one of them.

            Talk to Palestinians, they’re terrified of Trump’s bromance with Bibi.

            Fuck you just making shit up to win an internet argument. Bloodless fucking ghoul.

            Democrats are an easier to defeat enemy.

            Based on what? How for 3 out of every 4 years it’s fucking forbidden to say a bad word about them and how they siphon off everyone who would otherwise have human morals from actual good work? How the fucking shit are you having the goddamned fucking gall to say this shit when the only fighting you want to do against them is telling people to vote for them?

            Well good news! They got beat, so now we can move on, right??

            • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              19 days ago

              “Support” and “damage mitigation” are two very different things.

              Fuck you just making shit up to win an internet argument.

              I’ve been donating directly to Palestinians distributing aid for years. I talk to them, that’s what they say. But sure, you know better.

              the only fighting you want to do against them is telling people to vote for them?

              Who said anything about “only”? I’m talking about setting the floor and working from there. Look at the two options on election day, and vote for the better starting point.

              • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                19 days ago

                Don’t listen to the Palestinians who correctly observe that they’re being exterminated with a democrat in charge. Listen to the Palestinians I claim exist who support the democrats that are committing a genocide against them. The people of Palestine want Juan Guiado as their president.

                Who said anything about “only”? I’m talking about setting the floor and working from there. Look at the two options on election day, and vote for the better starting point.

                No one said shit. I’m watching what you actually do and what happened the last 4 years when you got what you wanted. It puts the lie to all the hollow bullshit you’ve repeated to death here.

                You distributed aid with one hand and you voted for their extermination with the other. I don’t give a fuck what you have to say or what percentage of it is not a lie. I’m sure you’re telling the truth about the last part. You’re a nazi.

                • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  19 days ago

                  Don’t listen to the Palestinians who correctly observe that they’re being exterminated with a democrat in charge.

                  I listen to both. Neither party will end this. One party will expand and accelerate it. Both things are true. That’s what they have been saying, that Biden’s policies, and by presumptive extension Kamala’s, were horrific, but Trump would be even worse. And you claim the voices saying that are a rhetorical fabrication. Erasing victims of genocide in an impossible situation pleading to mitigate the damage, because that conflicts with your Internet argument. Who is the bloodless ghoul?

                  I’m watching what you actually do and what happened the last 4 years when you got what you wanted.

                  You don’t know the first thing about what I actually do and what I want. I don’t want the Democrats. I just want MAGA even less, and no one else has 80 million votes.

                  You distributed aid with one hand and you voted for their extermination with the other.

                  I voted to keep out the greater evil, but sure. Pretend that if Biden lost and Trump was in office on Oct 8, Palestine would be better off. One thing is true, the genocide would have ended much sooner. Get out of your Internet bubble.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      Democrats keep losing because they have a fundamental misunderstanding of the game they are playing. Democracy is not a game of having the best ideas or plans or even character. You can win hearts and minds with passionate leadership and rational persuasion, but we’ll never win another election if that’s the only lever they want to press. It’s a progressive truism that people, given the same information and the same priorities, will reach the same conclusion. So therefore if a conservative has a difference of opinion, they must either not have the same information, or they must have different priorities. That’s why progressives are so frequently astounded at the hypocrisy and mental gymnastics required to support Trump while claiming any moral highground on any position.

      How can they claim they want traditional family values when Trump is a thrice-divorced rapist with an obvious attraction to his own daughter? How can they oppose immigration when Trump has had two foreign national brides and Musk was an illegal immigrant? How can they oppose a woman’s right to choose when Trump has paid women to abort fetuses he sired? How can they claim to be patriotic while Trump gargles Putin’s sweaty raisin bag? How can they claim to want fiscal responsibility when Trump has driven his businesses into the ground, routinely declaring bankruptcy and using his political influence to line his own pockets? How can they claim to want lower costs of living when Trump plans to raise tariffs on imported goods, making literally everything more expensive?

      The answer is that they don’t care. They don’t care about having all the information, or having true information. The conservative mind is not a rational actor. It’s not built on priorities or fundamental beliefs. There is only one core idea at the nexus of every conservative ideology:

      Me good.

      That’s it. That’s all there is. Dig down far enough, under all the bullshit and psychological spaghetti of beliefs, and you’ll find one nugget of truth. I am a good person, therefore whatever I want is good, and anyone that wants something else is bad. If it helps me to lie or cheat or murder, then I’ll do those things and they will be good because I did them to help me.

      This has always been the comforting lie of conservative thought. Conservatives claim to want stoic preservation of national values, but the reality is that those values inexorably align with their own personal gain. It is not, as most conservatives prefer to believe, a resistance to change for change’s sake, but a narcissistic demand that all policies and decisions benefit themselves.

      It’s more transparent now because Trump has worn thin the veneer of reasonable discretion, but the closer to the surface it gets, the more effective the messaging. It’s OK to be selfish, and ignorant, and cruel, and criminal, because deep down we deserve to do whatever we want. We deserve to get whatever we want. Anyone trying to keep it from us deserves to be destroyed. Anything we do to destroy those who would stop us is righteous. Cuz me good.

      You’re never going to convince a conservative to vote for the lesser of two evils, because the greater of the two will simply lie to them. The greater evil will tell them they can have it all, that the dangers of climate change or viral pandemics aren’t real, that they don’t have to change their behavior or learn something new. They don’t have to get out of bed in the morning, they can stay warm under the covers and skip school or work or adulting, and everything will be just fine.

      To win an election, you have to convince the conservatives that it is in their best interest to vote for the progressive candidate. That might sound like a tall order, but we already know how to do it. We already see the gameplan that works on all conservatives. We have seen how centrists and moderates and neoliberals win in conservative strongholds.

      Progressives just need to start lying.

      • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        20 days ago

        Democrats were lying about trying to achieve a ceasefire. But their current position in office slightly undermined their lies.

      • AnneVolin@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        20 days ago

        Progressives just need to start lying.

        What do you mean “start”? They already have been.

          • AnneVolin@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            20 days ago

            Oh I don’t know, Gaza ceasefire, Biden being a one turn president and not fucking the party and the nation, pardoning your crackhead son, we can keep going all the way back to card check if you want won’t help.

            Also my favorite saga of this presidency was price controls. 2 years ago the CHUDs had their gas is expensive meme phase with their “I did that” Brandon stickers and the entire Dem party went on the offensive of saying “THE PRESIDENT DOESN’T CONTROL GAS PRICES YOU ABSOLUTE MORON YOU ABSOLUTE IMBICILE” and then 2 years later Kamala Harris’ platform (the one that nobody actually read except to send as a PDF to people to prove that they’re wrong about her) says she can lower the price of groceries. Which one is it guys?

            Dems lie all the time. There’s just an entire media ecosystem ready to give you a technocratic puppet theater about why or how it’s smart, or how it actually doesn’t count and how they’re still the good guys.

            Hell Glen Kessler makes an entire department’s paycheck by writing “fact checking” where he picks and chooses the dumbest most obvious lies to call a lie, promotes the most innocuous irrelevant truths and then conveniently ignores the statements/lies that would actually impact the American people if they were fulfilled.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        20 days ago

        This will get deleted because you’re on the .ml instance. Comments here will be carefully pruned to enforce a narrative.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      It wouldnt matter if the democrats lost if 3rd parties had equal and fair access to the electoral process.

      Unfortunately, democrats prefer republican authoritarianism over having to actually compete for your vote.

      Party over country all the way until the dissolution of this stupid fucking nation state that enslaved us all.

      • MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        Don’t forget how the Democrats supported free and fair elections by suing third parties all over the country to remove them from ballots and collaborated with Republicans to form private organizations that allowed them to legally bar third parties from participating in debates and gaining valuable time in the media.

  • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    There is no election in sight, this is prime time to criticize the DNC. Anyone trying to shut down discussion right now is the biggest loser DNC shill you can imagine.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      I already see people running disclaimers in their comments that are critical of democrats. If only we weren’t handcuffed to these garbage people by First-past-the-post voting.

  • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    20 days ago

    If you think your political role is to uncritically support whoever is chosen for you by the Democratic party, you are simply throwing away your political power. Worse, you are indicating that their strategy of shaming you into compliance works and they never have to provide you with any political program that aligns with your positions.

    Instead of doing what the party tells you, think for yourself and work to build actual power for the people around you, not the capitalists picking your pocket.

  • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    My favorite postmortem take so far has been “why don’t democrats get in line like republicans do??”

    It’s just such perfect mask-off liberalism, I just want to make a supercut of it for next election when libs are whining about why their unpopular candidate/policies aren’t winning.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        20 days ago

        Most people just see Fascism as Hitler and killing people. They don’t recognize subservience to and complete blind support of corporate/wealth interests as a flavor of Fascism. It’s why I’ve grown to appreciate the term “friendly fascist.”

        “Yeah I’ll support your LGBTQ+ cause if all it costs are nice cheap words, BUT DON’T YOU FUCKING DARE TOUCH MY CORPORATE MONEY MACHINE!

  • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    Critiquing the dems while telling us how trump did some good things…

    Is this… Yes, its supporting trump.

    Otherwise, yeah, nail the dems to the wall.

    (Oops. Forgot this was .ml. Trump is good for reasons.)

    • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 days ago

      Who said anything about Trump besides you?

      I swear, libs make up their own narrative to punch left regardless of what Leftists do.

      • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        19 days ago

        Geezuz. Nobody had to say it. I’m saying if people do that, then yes they are.

        People. Learn how to read. Understand.

        Do you only read the first sentence of a comment?

        The density is suffocating.

    • bunchberry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      Good. That’s when Democrats should be criticized the most, because that is the only time you have the power to exercise any leverage over them. Why would you refuse to criticize them when you actually have a tiny bit of leverage and wait until you have no power at all and your criticism is completely irrelevant and will be ignored? That is just someone who wants to complain but doesn’t actually want anything to change.