Omgboom@lemmy.zip to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 months agoIt's truelemmy.zipimagemessage-square100fedilinkarrow-up11.08Karrow-down136
arrow-up11.04Karrow-down1imageIt's truelemmy.zipOmgboom@lemmy.zip to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 months agomessage-square100fedilink
minus-squarego $fsck yourself@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·3 months agoWhy does not liking killing people mean “supporting the aristocracy”? I in no way support the CEO, UHC, or any of the predatory insurance companies (which is all of them). I hate them, even. I still don’t like murder. I don’t see why those have to be mutually inclusive.
minus-squareGreenKnight23@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·edit-22 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squarego $fsck yourself@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·3 months agoThat’s definitely a very succinct way of putting it. Thanks. I’ll think on that. Though, the second example is definitely an intentional misinterpretation, since I never said anything that should be reasonably interpreted that way. Other than that, does this work too?
Why does not liking killing people mean “supporting the aristocracy”?
I in no way support the CEO, UHC, or any of the predatory insurance companies (which is all of them). I hate them, even.
I still don’t like murder.
I don’t see why those have to be mutually inclusive.
deleted by creator
That’s definitely a very succinct way of putting it. Thanks. I’ll think on that.
Though, the second example is definitely an intentional misinterpretation, since I never said anything that should be reasonably interpreted that way.
Other than that, does this work too?
deleted by creator