Two years after the Fairphone 4 and following the release of some audio products like the Fairbuds XL, the Dutch company is back with a new repairable phone: the Fairphone 5. It looks and feels a lot like the Fairphone 4, but it adds choice upgrades across the board, making it the most modular and also most modern-looking repairable phone from the company yet.

The design is largely unchanged compared to the Fairphone 4, but the improvements that the company did make go a long way: The teardrop notch and the LCD screen is finally gone, with an ordinary punch-hole selfie and an OLED taking its place. Otherwise, you’re looking at an aluminum frame, a triangular camera array, and a removable back cover. Here, the company brought back its signature translucent back cover next to two black and blue variants. The dimensions and weight has been reduced ever-so-slightly compared to the predecessor.

  • lud@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh, that’s nice. I am gonna buy one.

    Jk I will wait until my current phone is obsolete.

    • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I wonder how much longer mine will be supported. Went from Android 8 to 10 by the grace of OnePlus, and then I switched to Lineage first, now DivestOS, which had me go from 12 to 13.

      Still runs perfectly, so I hope they’ll keep it going. After all, my OnePlus 5T is actually part of the elusive list of golden devices for Divest. Didn’t even see that until two years later.

  • Prethoryn Overmind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Is it available in the U.S. yet?

    recently launched in the U.S.

    Does anyone with a Fair phone have time to tell me how it compares to Pixel? I have loved all of my Google Pixel products to the point I have lived with them for 7 years since their launch.

    • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The released fairphone 4 in the us comes with a special os, not based on android iirc.i think it was to test the waters.
      What i am curious about is wether they can be reflashed to run lineageOS

    • astral_avocado@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Arstechnica has in depth articles on 3, 4, and one about the 5 that should give you a good idea on this. I say this as a pixel owner who’s undecided myself…

    • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I am so new to this so bear with me. There is Lineage OS for fairphone 4 - does this mean there won’t be FOSS ROMs available for the fairphone 5?

        • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lineage OS, graphene, caylx, yk the stuff you jailbreak a phone for. People are saying this can run Ubuntu touch, and yet other people are saying this will be troublesome for the Android ROM community to develop for. Bear with me, I’m new to the concept and certainly might be wrong about something.

          • rah@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, it does not mean any of the projects you mentioned will be unavailable. None of those projects are free software OSes.

    • VO0RHAMER@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The processer has Linux support though. Isn’t it more the device drivers that are the problem?

      If thie phone gets mainline linux support I wil buy it in a heartbeat.

      • rah@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There are no good phones due to the way the SoC and modem manufacturers work. The best phones, like the PinePhone or PinePhone Pro, are simply the least bad.

    • phamanhvu01@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fairphones have always used Qualcomm SOCs, there’s nothing new here. I don’t understand the fuss here if I’m being honest.

  • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I like it. If Google didn’t send me a new pixel 6a when my 5a broke, I’d have bought one right now. Hopefully these catch on and are still around in a few years when this one breaks. I’ll get one for sure…

  • keardap@lemmy.selfhost.quest
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    The major issue for me is availability, they don’t sell the phone here, so if I buy through shipping services I can’t buy replacement parts.

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Looking at the spare parts from the shop it appears that it’s not possible. It would have been cool, but that must be pretty dang hard to do without compromising the new device.

  • Rayspekt@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Man I’ve never spent more than 300 bucks on any phone, fair or not. Isn’t there something in the 150-300 category that’s worth buying, more sustainable and de-googled/foss?

    I don’t do high end shit with my phone. I just browse the web, take notes and do 2FA stuff. I don’t need a 700€ phone for this, even considering the higher cost because of sustainability.

      • Rayspekt@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah but then you’ll have a worn out battery you can’t change easily (correct me in he latter if I’m wrong). I’ve seen some shops offering refurbished phones but the ones I saw had so high prices where you already may buy the new ones.

  • rambos@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I could live without headphones jack, but its thick and cost almost 2x the price I can afford. Id consider keeping it if I get it for free because I like the Idea of repairability

      • Dremor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        3.5mm jack takes way to much space, and it requires a dedicated DAC circuit. And there is not enough users to warrant it anymore, especially considering the existance of usbc to 3.5mm adapters which do exactly the same without wasting internal space.

        3.5mm is bound to disappear everywhere but dedicated audiophile hardware.

        I’m a vinyl collector and audiophile myself, I’d love to see analogical staying relevant, but let’s be realistic, smartphones are not dedicated enough to music to waste space for a feature that only 10% of the user will ever need.

        If you really need a portable device with a 3.5mm jack, go buy a Walkman. Sony still make new ones, and they all have 3.5mm jacks.

  • sheogorath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would definitely get this phone if I can get it easily in my current location. Otherwise, I’ll help reduce my smartphone usage impact by using it long term and give it to my family members after I get a new phone.

    That’s what I did. Used my ROG Phone 2 for four years before giving it to my brother in law and getting a Fold5 because of work.

  • DTFpanda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It really does surprise me how so many people (at least on Reddit and Lemmy) care so deeply about a headphone jack.