I honestly don’t know what’s going on there. The sole mod and contributor of the community keeps posting low quality shit purely to bash on Linux and people kept calling him out in the posts and getting banned from the comm for that.

Now I noticed the same mod has just locked comments on all posts to prevent having to ban anyone commenting on their memes

  • 299792458ms@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Maybe it does not violate any “moderation” rules but it does definitely violate lemmy.world TOS on several counts

    • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Which ones does it violate, maybe we should get lemmy.world admins on this. I mean they’ve acted on his community before when he used an ableist slur, but they don’t seem to have done much else lately. Though they also might not be aware of how much it has devolved.

  • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Didn’t he lock the community and begin locking every post to keep people from replying? How are people still getting banned if they’re not able to post or comment there anymore?

  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I just had a mosey through, and oh boy does that person need a hobby. Making fun of Linux and annoying it’s fans is a noble goal, especially here, but they’re not doing a good job.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I love Linux, but everybody needs a good reminder that they’re not the shit, once in a while, and satire/memes are a great way to do that. Too bad that particular mod doesn’t know how to do either.

      It’s a shame, because it had the potential to be a great source of creative, self-deprecating humor, but instead, it’s just mean and trite.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Yeah, some genuine satirisation of some of the shit Linux fans come out with would be amazing.

        They’re completely unaware of how much technical gobbeldygook they come out with most of the time.

        • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I do like Linux, but I’m kind of amused at the insistence that ext4 volumes on HDDs don’t ever need to be defragged. Microsoft said the same thing about NTFS and look how that turned out. Fragmentation is a consequence of having finite storage and can’t be solved by just making a better FS. Throw seek times in and ext4 on an HDD does, in fact, benefit from regular defragging.

          • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            That’s not true. Yes there’s differences in how FS’ handle files. ext4 doesn’t need regular defragging because it self-defragging as part of its normal operation. Yes there may be cases where one needs to do a manual defrag on an almost completely full ext4 fs, but those would be extraordinarily rare.

          • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            When I talk about technical gobbeldygook, this is exactly what I mean. And FOSS enthusiasts will act like it’s all plainly obvious.

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I don’t even understand it sometimes, but I’m glad somebody does, because it doesn’t sound like something I would want to be in charge of!

  • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    That dude is a sad little creature that probably has nothing else in life that gives him a feeling of validation. I think he’s mildly amusing, actually.

    • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I think he’s mildly amusing, actually

      Yeah, been loosely following his story evolve, and lot of their stuff is like “that’s so stupid it’s funny” but there’s some other, more serious stuff like defending slavery (us prison shit) and victim blaming (when cops kill) that makes it very slimy and disgusting

  • spujb@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    the mod of that community is running a very specific, almost personal, project. i won’t say it’s 100% certainly without doubt satire but those are the vibes. their entire persona/digital characterization is so obviously flawed and reactionary as to give the impression of absurdity. poe’s law type of situation.

    a lot of people really dislike the project for understandable reasons. i personally find it entertaining. but the reality is no one is forcing you to see stuff you don’t like. very easy to block the community.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      i won’t say it’s 100% certainly without doubt satire but those are the vibes.

      It’s not. I recall someone asking the mod what the point of the community was, and they explicitly said they’re acting in earnest. They don’t just want to satire Linux, there’s an agenda and a mean spirit behind it.

      Too bad they are terrible at making biting or satirical points, and they often come off looking uneducated. It’s not really even ironically funny; it’s just kinda sad.

  • DarkNightoftheSoul@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Someone made a post about this just a couple weeks ago. Yeah that guy is a silly ass. Just ignore him, it’s best for all concerned.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It should be, but it ends up just being kind of sad like a jilted lover trying to villify their ex.

  • Lyre@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    I mean when you’re in an echo chamber this intense it’s natural to lash out. I kind of expected something like that to pop up eventually.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      A lot of the Linux subs have lively discussions on the pros and cons of Linux. I’ve never seen any instance where legitimate criticism was suppressed. Of course there’s an overall consensus that Linux is a good thing. But that doesn’t stop anyone from arguing a different viewpoint. The fact that this dude has to ban any dissent just shows that he has nothing of substance to say.