• Lightor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    17 天前

    Are we just going to ignore games that did well and have DEI. What about all the games without DEI that failed. Your logic is flawed.

    • derpgon@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 天前

      It was an example of “DEI first, story second”. The games that failed wouldn’t be saved by adding DEI. The games that did well was also not because of DEI.

      • Lightor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 天前

        Unless you have proof that’s an assumption. Because it can also be said that the DEI games that failed did so because they were bad games, not DEI.