• grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Somebody’s feeding him grandiose ideas about global warming and northern sea routes. Probably some flattering lies about splitting said routes between them and dominating world trade too, once Canada and the EU are out of the way.

    • federal reverse@feddit.orgM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      To be fair, China has been investing in thawing sea routes for a while, though largely to free themselves from having to pass through the US-controlled South China Sea.

          • Nay@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            But not a sea! I’m guessing it works like email addresses… As long as someone else doesn’t have it, you can make it your own

      • gnutrino@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t see how thawing seas help China unless they’re planning on retaking Outer Manchuria from Russia?

        • federal reverse@feddit.orgM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Not sure what Manchuria has to do with it … the Chinese are looking for a sea route to deliver goods to Europe.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            So they would go north to avoid US control, passing through [checks notes] the US/Japan-controlled East China Sea and the US-controlled Bering Strait?

              • grue@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                If it’s just to avoid navigation hazards and save time, what was your point in mentioning that the South China Sea is “US-controlled?”

                • federal reverse@feddit.orgM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  24 hours ago

                  Because the South China Sea is a US-controlled tight spot and such spots are obviously easier to control than the proposed Bering Sea passage.

                  • grue@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    23 hours ago

                    I don’t understand. Are you saying that the US has a hard time controlling the waters just off the coast of Alaska? I mean, I get that we don’t necessarily “need” to patrol them heavily right now because of the ice, but I don’t think that means it would be hard to do so if it became a priority.

    • ECB@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      True, same reason he’s hung up on the Panama canal (and why they always get brought up together)