Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 天前Hexadecimalslrpnk.netexternal-linkmessage-square137fedilinkarrow-up11.05Karrow-down124
arrow-up11.03Karrow-down1external-linkHexadecimalslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 天前message-square137fedilink
minus-squaremacniel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down3·3 天前its the capital city of China :D you know, where something happend on a specific square in the specific year of 1984.
minus-squaremacniel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down1·edit-23 天前oh… sorry, you are right. but you will get the same result.
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down6·3 天前You think DeepSeek won’t talk about one of the largest cities in the world?
minus-squareKusimulkku@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up10·3 天前You know, you could’ve just tested it yourself lol
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down8·3 天前Why would I do that when the Internet will correct me? Seems like a really weird line to draw. I guess they got bored of people trying to trick it into talking about Tianamen?
minus-squareKusimulkku@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·3 天前It was just funny the way you dismissed the claim without testing it yourself. But it’s almost too silly to be true
minus-squareTempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·3 天前Well shit. I thought it was BS too. But damn if it didn’t abort after a little deep thinking on the Olympics.
minus-squaremacniel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 天前Oh it does… but then it will remove everything and states that it’s out of scope.
minus-square𒉀TheGuyTM3𒉁@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up8·3 天前That would be 4 june 1989, not 9 june 1984 sir ;)
minus-squaremacniel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up4·3 天前My life is a lie :o Thanks for the correction.
What’s that?
its the capital city of China :D
you know, where something happend on a specific square in the specific year of 1984.
You missed the g.
oh… sorry, you are right.
but you will get the same result.
You think DeepSeek won’t talk about one of the largest cities in the world?
You know, you could’ve just tested it yourself lol
Why would I do that when the Internet will correct me?
Seems like a really weird line to draw. I guess they got bored of people trying to trick it into talking about Tianamen?
It was just funny the way you dismissed the claim without testing it yourself. But it’s almost too silly to be true
Well shit. I thought it was BS too. But damn if it didn’t abort after a little deep thinking on the Olympics.
Oh it does… but then it will remove everything and states that it’s out of scope.
That would be 4 june 1989, not 9 june 1984 sir ;)
My life is a lie :o
Thanks for the correction.