• Kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I wonder why you are so triggered, but ok.

    In my country they are, for example, allowed to state that their product is made here even if it is ONLY processed and packaged here.

    Assuming this is the same situation (and I’d be very surprised if it isn’t), “product of Germany” is false and should not be allowed.

    • Tabloid@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s not correct in this case. Which is also easily researchable on the internet.

      Coca-Cola in Germany is bottled in many different plants locally, by the biggest Coca-Cola bottling company worldwide. It is a british company licensing the use of the brand and name from the US Coca-Cola company, but a separate entity.

        • Tabloid@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          That is something different from processed and packaged, which you talked about in your first comment.

          Of course not, most ingredients however will be EU produced/processed and then processed into the final drinks in Germany.

          But aside from pure agricultural product, almost no product would be “product of Germany” if using no imports would be the requirement to use that lable.

          • Kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Then you didn’t read my comment carefully, because my point is that ONLY a product that is ENTIRELY produced in a single country should be marketed as such.

            All the rest is pure marketing lies.