• Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    129
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    If you’ve ever worked customer service, you know that automatically providing instructions is warranted; half the people you run into in public would struggle to operate a spoon without guidance.

  • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 days ago

    Vinyl records being popular again is very cool and not a comeback I would have ever expected. What’s really interesting to me is how much better quality they are than in previous decades.

    Records had been around for a century (vinyl for about 40 years) by the time they were phased out of mainstream music distribution in the late 80’s. Over time, manufacturers used cheaper and thinner vinyl to the point where they were just complete and utter shit.

    The ones they put out today are thicker and closer to audiophile grade than their predecessors.

    • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Same thing happened with casette tapes and cassette mechanisms.

      Most people think cassette tapes were terrible, because they remember the bargain basement iron tapes and no noise reduction. A top quality chrome casette when recorded well and played back on the right hardware is very difficult to tell apart from the digital original.

      Similar story with VHS to be honest.

      There’s a “minimum acceptable quality” which people were willing to tolerate, and manufacturers inevietably converge towards it in an effort to shave off a few cents here and there.

      Audiophile now is very different, because it’s not a mass market consumer format any longer - it’s a niche hobby, and people are willing to pay top money for their hobbies.

      • Psythik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Really? I’ve heard the opposite: that modern cassette players are garbage because they all reuse the same Chinese mechanism with mono playback and no Dolby noise reduction.

        If you want a good cassette player, you’re supposed to buy one from the 80s or 90s, preferably a Sony.

        • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Well yes that’s true.

          The modern hobbyist resurgence is in vinyl, not cassette. I was only mentioning cassette to make the point that the same phenomenon occurs in other media too - of technologies getting worse over time. Especially true in cassette, in fact.

          Good cassettes players are old ones.

        • Vivian (they/them)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah that’s exactly the problem with modern cassette players, they’re almost a waste of money. And the tape that is still produced today is quite terrible compared the old tape, so you also have to find old tape as well

    • apprehensively_human@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      It seems hit or miss. Most of my vinyl is 180 gram, I guess because it isn’t the primary means of consumption for music these days, people expect to pay a little more for better quality. But I definitely have a lot of cheaper, thinner records that I bought brand new in the last few years.

    • frank@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Hasn’t vinyl been around longer than 1985?

      I suddenly feel old, doing the math wasn’t nice to me

      • LucasWaffyWaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        2 days ago

        They’re saying that by the late 80s when cassettes and CDs ultimately replaced the record, records had been in use for over a century, and the recognizable 12" disc format had been in use for 40 years prior to their replacement.

    • Z3k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Erm I have vinal records my dad gave me from the 50s

      You are correct they are thin as shit though compared to the ones I buy now

  • redwattlebird@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    I actually saw a shop that developed film the other day in my local area. Genuinely surprised and delighted me. Got a brief trip through time and space to nostalgia land where I was constantly being told off for taking photos of landscape.

  • FistingEnthusiast@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    2 days ago

    I was telling a kid today how we’d sit by the radio, hoping to record a song onto a cassette tape, pleading with the gods that we wouldn’t miss the start, and that the DJ wouldn’t talk over the end of the song, or fade it into another one

    She accused me of being from the stone age

  • T156@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Isn’t showing how to use the camera just a common courtesy if you’re asking them to take a photo for you? It’s not really specific to a disposable camera, nor today. Even back in the day, people would do the same, despite cameras generally having a big clear button to take the photo with.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Two teens asked me if I would take their picture and I said sure. One of them handed me her phone and I ran away with it. Hey, free phone.

    (shut up, it’s a fucking joke)

  • PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    My eldest asked me “have you seen the memes about this One Pound Fish guy?”

    I’m like “dude, I paid my 79p to try and get that song to Number 1”… back when it mattered.

  • Zagorath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’mma be honest, I’ve used disposable cameras, but not in a long time. I’d appreciate the reminder if I were handed one. Something about winding after (or before?) each photo?

    • PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      For most of them, it doesn’t matter. When the film is wound on, it would hit a ratchet stop to prevent you winding it beyond the next film cell anyway - which would only be released when the shutter button was operated, so you’d intuitively feel whether the film had been already wound forward or not.

      This thread reminds me of inexpensive package holidays as a child. It’s brilliant.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        When I was a kid my parents used to buy loads of those disposable cameras whenever we went on holiday to keep me and my sister quiet. It’s hard to believe that we found it diverting.

        Today’s kids would not be happy with anything less than an iPad.

        • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          Brief moment in history…

          I remember reading this tip in a magazine. Instead of having a professional photographer at a wedding, put a disposable camera at every table.

          • Zagorath@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            That should be a tip for your reception, not the wedding itself.

            These days it’s reasonably common to replace the disposable cameras with a QR code or link to where people can upload photos they took on their phone.