• Kindness is Punk@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    Internet should be a public utility, not having access to affordable,reliable internet is one of the drivers of inequality and should not be left to corporations acting on the profit motive.

  • Pyr@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    They don’t invest, they take tax payer funded subsidies and then bill us for the pleasure.

  • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 days ago

    The big three trying to hold us hostage to gain more government dollars is par for the course. Assholes gotta asshole I guess.

    Maybe it’s time to cut them off at their knees.

    • Daniel Quinn@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Any plan that starts with “If everyone can just…” is doomed to fail. This needs legislation and at least the threat of nationalisation if not the act.

    • Reannlegge@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Been on Sasktel all my life, started getting more actively involved in politics when Wall wanted to sell 49% (or 51% I don’t remember) of Sasktel as a trial run or whatever the heck he called it.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I don’t see how 51% could be a trial of anything as they’d lose control. 49% you could see how pressure from investors harms the company though and could painfully be walked back from. Terrible idea though.

        • DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          They were considering selling 49%, but the percentage is meaningless without looking at the articles, the bylaws, and resolutions. A lot of corporations make things more strict than the Bus Corp. act. You can always make things more strict, you can’t make them more lax.

          In fact, some things require a “Special Resolution” which is 2/3rds.
          BUT, that can mean 2/3 of the shareholders who show up, as long as enough people show up to make a quorum.
          And a quorum can be as small as 1 person, again, depending on the Articles, bylaws, and resolutions.

          If you feel like learning about the Saskatchewan Business Corporations act, here is it:
          https://www.canlii.org/en/sk/laws/astat/ss-2021-c-6/latest/ss-2021-c-6.html