ugh. the article talks about it as an economic issue which annoys me. I have not encountered anything that in practice is proven to actually sequesters more carbon than it creates. I mean im fine with small scale poc type experimentation but if something is going to be scaled up they need to really look at if it can sequester more than it produces at each level of scale and be sure in a six sigma kind of way.
ugh. the article talks about it as an economic issue which annoys me. I have not encountered anything that in practice is proven to actually sequesters more carbon than it creates. I mean im fine with small scale poc type experimentation but if something is going to be scaled up they need to really look at if it can sequester more than it produces at each level of scale and be sure in a six sigma kind of way.