There’s a clear campaign against the mentally ill with the global rise of fascism. Lots of it shows up in anti homeless rhetoric, but you can see it in the MAHA and anti vaccination movements.

There’s no reason to use the word “r-tarded” to describe someone. As someone who’s worked with the intellectually challenged, it’s an insult to them to compare them with people who are willfully ignorant.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 minutes ago

    You’re right technically but things have regression so far back were at 2016 levels of slurs the nword is making a comeback. Until thats sorted you have zero chance getting people to care about retard.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    31 minutes ago

    Bless your heart!

    (See how that’s FAR more insulting? No? Perhaps you’re retarded?)

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    32 minutes ago

    People who are literally retarded are not the ones reading this post, or surfing the internet in general. People who are literally retarded can’t read.

    “bUt Im NeurOdiVERgent!”

    Shut the fuck up. We’re not talking about you. Lemmy seems to think they’re all special mental cases. No, everything I see on here about ADHD and autism is mostly normal human foibles. My daughter is both, a little strange to me, nothing crazy, I can still relate to most of her “issues”. I understand she sees the world differently than me, I try to adjust for that.

    Growing up and navigating the most complex society we’ve ever faced, and didn’t evolve for, can be quite a challenge. Suck it up buttercup. Recognize your strengths, recognize your weaknesses, don’t be hurt by fucking words. If being called names breaks your spine, well, you’re not going to do well on this planet.

    The whole thing is made up hate by people who had their feelings hurt being called retarded in school. It’s a 4th-grade insult that snowflakes have decided is now a “seriously harmful” term. I’ve been called the dreaded “F” word 1,000 times, so what? Didn’t turn me gay or even hurt my fee fees.

    In 5-years “stupid” will be outlawed. There will be a YouTube video of some teen crying their eyes out, relating how being called stupid ruined their whole life and now they have to kill themselves. “Idiot” will be banned by 2027. Any words that could possibly be understood as negative adjectives describing a human being will be verboten by 2030.

    Bless your heart!

  • vrek@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Here’s the thing, the word doesn’t matter… It’s the intent. For example if I said “well aren’t you a fucking genius” and meant it sarcastically that’s just as insulting. I could also say “you gobflecker” in a aggressive tone that also bad.

    An example is the old show red dwarf. The replaced every curse word with smeg. Smeg doesn’t mean anything. But in the show when one character calls another a “smeghead”. You know it’s not nice and meant to be an insult even though they never said or explained that in the show.

    Banning a word won’t do anything. Ban the attitude and change people’s opinions and you can change the world. For example women, not saying they are treated well by everyone but compared to 200 years ago? Or even further back? For example there was a “treatment” for women who dared consider working. They were basically forced to bed and forced to stay there only hand few broth for 6 months. They literally just had to lay there, no talking no reading no such thing as a video. Today they are treated much better, it wasn’t by banning the world girl or bitch or vagina or anything it was by changing people’s perception.

    • khepri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      47 minutes ago

      Absolutely recommend you try this out with some slurs on people of various races and see if saying “the word doesn’t matter” stops them from beating the shit out you lol

    • SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The word doesn’t matter, it’s the intent.

      Eh, maybe, but words communicate intent. By stigmatizing certain messaging - which can include both reserving certain words for only certain use cases and also shaming people who express bigotry regardless of what word they happen to choose - we communicate to third party observers that such views are not welcome in our society. Will it change the mind of the person using those words? Probably not, but avoiding hurtful words still has a great deal of positive social utility.

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Yeah. We’ve been down this road before. Believe it or not but all those african american navy seals with gay brothers who also were active duty military? Yeah, they were just shitty white kids who wanted to say nr and ft a lot. Who’da thunk it?

      No. It is about showing the absolute bare minimum of human decency to change your vocabulary and avoid using slurs that people have to constantly hear from people who AREN’T actually african american navy seals with gay brothers and all that.

      Ban the attitude and change people’s opinions and you can change the world.

      And a huge chunk of that is to stop saying fucking slurs.

      but compared to 200 years ago? Or even further back?

      Homie… are you ACTUALLY playing the “You could be property so shut the fuck up if I want to say a slur” card?

      Also, I strongly suggest anyone who thinks “history” was a no woman’s land or was all about racial purity to actually do some research. Shockingly, things were actually a LOT more “progressive” than they would expect with most bigotry and hatred being more oriented towards killing those Others across the channel. Most of the “We used to be a whole lot more racist and sexist” is, shockingly, from racist and sexist people who want to “make <insert country> great again”.

    • Windex007@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I’m unaware of an existent group of people for whom the term “smeg” is or historically was thier actual designation?

      It isn’t about not insulting someone, it’s about using language that refers to actual people who haven’t done anything wrong.

      It’s like if suddenly everyone decided to call a pedophile a Vrek. You maybe wouldn’t love that suddenly people are invoking YOU to talk about pedophiles.

      That’s the kind of collateral damage people are trying to avoid.

      I’ve for sure said things are retarded. I’m no saint. I’ve got mixed feelings… but I think your take on the subject is poorly informed. I think you’ve missed the entire premise of the argument against using the word.

      • PiraHxCx@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        So it seems like we are going to have to wait until impaired, challenged and disabled are turned into slurs by the overly-sensitive so removed can achieve the neutral status of idiot, dumb, stupid, moron and imbecile - words that removed used to be considered the politically correct alternative.

        • SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I don’t think anyone is saying that clinical language doesn’t have a use. If anything, it’s the use of these words as general-purpose insults that makes them unfit for clinical use, not the other way around.

        • Windex007@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I think the argument is whizzing over your head too.

          The logical breakdown here is pretty simple:

          Argument #1 (OP): It’s probably not good to use disadvantaged groups as a slur.

          Argument #2 (You and most others): Well if we do that then I don’t have words to degrade people.

          These are completely orthogonal arguments, and I sincerely have sympathy for both. I genuinely do think there is communicative value in having words that illicit the intended response of calling someone’s argument “retarded”. I know what I mean. You know what I mean. It actually has nothing to do with people who are actually handicapped. It’s effective communication… it just has an unfortunate BYPRODUCT.

          But not having slurs isn’t a counter-argument to the thesis that using disadvantaged groups as slurs is bad.

          Strawmanning it as “PC gone mad” is just a convenient way to avoid actually addressing the concern head on.

          Like, just be a fucking man: “Yeah, it probably isn’t good to use disadvantaged groups as slurs, but I’m at a loss for language that satisfies that while also effectively getting the content and TONE of my communication across, so I’m going to use it anyways. Not everythingi do is ideal.”

          As soon as you abandon the ego-sheltering delusion that you don’t do things that are probably not great, you can actually think about things objectively without hitting a mental panic button the second you’re forced to evaluate a legitimate position in which your current behaviors would be evaluated as bad.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    6 hours ago

    So the solution to mean people co-opting medical language to be bullies is to …move to another term and change the vernacular we accept from doctors so they use different words the bullies can then co-opt?

    Have you tried an approach that isn’t running and hiding?

  • ziltoid101@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I find it difficult to imagine a future in which humans aren’t making fun of impaired cognition.

    I think the context is what’s most important, if anyone actually directs such language (be it retarded, idiot, etc) towards people with genuine mental impairment, that constitutes a slur. But the word ‘retarded’ literally means ‘slow’, and is still regularly used (including by myself) in scientific and technical contexts (compared to racist or homophobic slurs, which are only ever really used in a ‘slur’ kind of way).

    I wouldn’t really have a problem with calling people ‘slow’ in jest, and I don’t think many would. Imo if not ‘retarded’, it’ll be something else with the same meaning.

  • rowdy@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Honestly, it’s not a word in my vocabulary but I think this opinion is moronic, idiotic even.

    The only reason it continues to be offense to those living with mental disabilities is because there are people like yourself who keep attributing the word to them.

      • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The n-word isn’t going through a continuous euphemism tread mill, unlike how r word variants continue to go through. That, I think, makes it substantially different — though in truth it’s the same for it as well

  • modernangel@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    There’s a historical cycle where the helping professions rotate the terminology out, as the wider culture overloads the old terms with insulting usage. Eventually the new vernacular leaks out into general parlance and the cycle cycles. “Retarded” was once acceptable clinical terminology because "idiot, “moron”, and “imbecile” had accumulated cultural baggage. The latter terms were, themselves, once politically correct alternatives to even older terms.

    I think it’s naive to think that THIS time is special, and today’s politically correct terminology won’t ever leak out into common usage as a slur too.

    • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      If a group of people are telling me this word was and continues to be used as a dehumanizing slur, that’s enough for me to look into a vocabulary change. More importantly, the very existence of a euphemism treadmill shows that you can’t stop at language change, and that disabled people need to be much more fully accepted in society.

    • andros_rex@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Which gets to the larger problem - the dehumanization of people with intellectual and cognitive disabilities. Being such a person is considered such a bad thing that it can be used as an insult. Whatever terminology we use, people with cognitive delays are just as human, just as valuable as anyone else.

      • SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        People with cognitive delays are just as human and just as valuable as anyone else

        Precisely! 100% agree.

        I also want to add that I don’t disagree with people who say that there’s a cyclical pattern with words becoming taboo and being replaced. That’s obviously a fact. But the fact that language evolves doesn’t give us license to be assholes.

        Ultimately, the only thing that will improve things is educating the average person about the topic. But calling out ableist language - whether the person using such language intends that meaning or not - is often a good starting point for education (for those willing to learn.)

        Also, what most people don’t understand is that developmental delays and cognitive deficiencies are a spectrum and can occur across different types of cognition. For example, I’m what today you might call “doubly special” - I was far ahead in some areas but far behind in others. I still am, to a degree.

        So should people use the names for people like me to refer to assholes who intentionally hurt other people’s feelings? I certainly wouldn’t like it if they did. Regardless of how much I might accidentally piss people off or hurt their feelings, it’s rarely my intention to make people feel that way and and I’d rather not have someone else’s moral failing conflated with my struggle to communicate in ways most people understand.

  • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    It is so weird to me that this opinion is unpopular, but judging by some of the comments here, I see your point.

  • calamityjanitor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I’ve stopped using it as people have pointed out it’s hurtful, but I’ve never fully understood why. To me it’s in the same group as idiot, fool, lunatic, imbecile and cretin. Words that aren’t used to describe conditions anymore, only used as insults. While they can be used with hatred, they can also be used in a teasing way with friends. To me it doesn’t reach the level of racist, sexist and homophobic slurs.

    I wanted to learn more and found a paper that makes the case that ableist insults are slurs. Download it here

    • SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I think it’s more about the idea that it’s shameful to be less able than someone else. The core idea here is that there’s nothing wrong with being less intelligent than average, and calling out people’s choice of words is only one part of that.

      It’s like when people make fun of Trump’s weight/diet or RFK Jr.'s voice. I dislike those two just as much as the next person, but there’s nothing immoral or shameful about having a vocal condition, being overweight, or having a monotonous diet. And any health concerns (e.g. weight) should be left between a person and their doctor.

      If you choose to make those things a subject of your ridicule, all it does is mark you as a shallow person, and I’m probably going to tune you out as someone who doesn’t have anything of substance to say.

  • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 hours ago

    What’s the next euphemism we should switch to?

    For a while there in the 90’s, “differently abled” looked like it was next on the treadmill.

    Words for stupid or crazy are always going to be used as insults.

    • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The *r slur is intentionally cruel in a way that stupid can’t match, since stupid is more generic and versatile.

      Maybe the *r slur doesn’t need a replacement, we can just hold ourselves to a higher standard, and drag things without compating them to someone with a disability.

  • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    “Demons” is a derogatory term. You should use “Mortally Challenged”

    • Doom Eternal
    • altkey (he\him)@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      As a legal representative of an online platform and social media website 9GAG.com, I ask you to put this post down as it unmistakingly violates our intelectual property, there: our brand of humor. Failure to so would be followed with a formal DMCA request to your fediverse provider, and then court. I reached out to you in hopes it won’t get to that.

      Sincerely, David Altkey