What are your thoughts? How would it shape the future of the game tactically? Which style of play or manager would have the most success?

I would say that a high press system that relies on mitigating counter attacks by catching the opponent offside might suffer the most. For example - Ange’s high line defense against Chelsea in their 4-1 loss.

  • margieler@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s still going to be drawn by millimeters when you have an attacker who’s run past a defender and their toe may or may not be ahead or on line with them.

    Doesn’t fix the issue at all but will basically eliminate the high-line.

  • DikinBaus88@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Let’s meet halfway and say a certain percentage of a player’s body to be ahead of the defender to be considered offsides. I don’t like the idea of the whole body but I also hate seeing an elbow being slightly ahead of someone and being offside.

  • roofilopolis@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Game would become more defensive with defenses sitting a little deeper and not getting as involved in the attack.

    We’d see a premium on fast defenders that could keep up. Probably a premium on faster attackers too.

  • Onac_@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am for this change 100%. Yes it just moves the lines and you will still have the same “1 inch offside” but at least then we can all look at it and said you’re fucking off! Right now it goes against everything I grew up playing g and officiating which was “even” is onside. Anyway complaining about this would complain about any change to any rule.

    To answer your question is it affects everyone and no one. the teams that play a low blow will still do it. the teams that play a high line will still do it. they just adjust slightly. People are acting like players and coaches cannot adapt.

    • Welshpoolfan@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right now it goes against everything I grew up playing g and officiating which was “even” is onside

      Well this is just patently untrue.

      For a start, “even” is still onside now. Secondly, “even” being onside only became a thing in 1990. So actually most people will have grown up playing at a time when even was offside and it always had been for almost 150 years before 1990.

  • scooterMcBooter97@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I just don’t understand this rule at all. Isn’t the whole point of the offside rule so offensive players can’t just get absurd head starts on defenders with momentum as defenders need to turn and then start to pick up speed?

    Just seams really dumb tbh and doesn’t make any sense. Why hold any line at all if players can just run full speed past you with a huge window of success. Teams are gonna play a back three not sitting higher than the edge of their own box.

    • Retinion@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Isn’t the whole point of the offside rule so offensive players can’t just get absurd head starts on defenders with momentum as defenders need to turn and then start to pick up speed?

      No, the point of Offside is to stop people goal hanging.

      Just seams really dumb tbh and doesn’t make any sense.

      It makes the game flow better, stops these ridiculous mm Offsides that give absolutely zero advantage to a player and will create more goals which is better for the sport.

      • ChrisGadge@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Obviously agree about the point of offside, but don’t get how you think it will stop the ridiculous mm offsides? Really not a fan tbh I get that there would be more goals initially but long term I don’t think the game would improve as it would just encourage defending very deep.

  • grollate@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Teams that play a high line and exciting football. No defense will want to get into a foot race when the opponent has a head start.

  • hazzap913@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Or stop thinking of stupid rules to put in and just use the system the World Cup had because it worked, but pgmol won’t do it because they can’t influence it how they want

    • Risk_E_Biscuits@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It was the EPL that voted not to use it, not the PGMOL. Blame the teams for voting against it because it was “too expensive” lol

      Hopefully they adopt it for next season

  • aDudeWhoSaysThings@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’ll be literally no impact whatsoever. It’s the exact same rule, just with a slightly different starting point.

  • SoccerGeekPhd@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It wont solve anything. A better change would be no offside at all if ball is between 18yd line (extended across pitch) and end line. High line would still work, but you need to mark attackers inside the penalty area. This would get rid of a lot of the checks.