despite being owned by a state with which the UK has many interests economically will it be one of the cases that might go unpunished?

  • alucardou@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ah, but everton is actually a different club. They wouldn’t do anything to hurt their favorite little golden child. If that were the case they would have done it years ago

    • hipcheck23@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s all about pressure from both sides. Can the public threaten the sanctity of the money-making machine enough, or is a sovereign ruler too imposing? The two sides may discuss where the threshold is… at some point, I’d guess, it’s just worth accepting a real hit.

    • snowiestflakes@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They wouldn’t do anything to hurt their favorite little golden child

      lol wat. Then why charge City at all after they were wholly exonerated by CAS? The charges have already done plenty of damage because your average know-nothing red club fan presumes guilt from the outset which the media happily tap into.

    • Bitter_Birthday7363@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Surely they just wouldn’t press charges in the first place then ? I don’t get this logic the FA are doing years of investigation when that have no intention of following up ?