I just searched for chrome vs firefox and just about every article from the past year or so say firefox is more secure. Not that it matters a lot either way. Two party system is crap.
How so? at least on Android and Linux there is a lack of sandboxing and site isolation. This could be fixed up to a certain point but anyways it would be more insecure than chromium.
Do you have a more recent article describing that? 2022 is old but I’ve not seen anything backing up your claim either
To the dumbass downvoters: why does lemmy hate the concept of backing up claims so much? There are two conflicting claims, one that says Linux sandbox is bad, another saying its fine. I’ll believe the first person who can actually back their shit up. Nobody should believe either claim until then. This isn’t complicated.
The problem with iron fox is that it’s so hardened about privacy that it breaks functionality l, for example you can’t even use add-ons if you don’t enable it first, it is disabled by default…
Objectively more insecure and underperformant than ANY other chromium based browser.
Got a source for that incredible claim?
If you’re going to make wild claims that most people would disagree with, you better be able to back it up with objective facts
deleted by creator
https://madaidans-insecurities.github.io/firefox-chromium.html
I just searched for
chrome vs firefoxand just about every article from the past year or so say firefox is more secure. Not that it matters a lot either way. Two party system is crap.How so? at least on Android and Linux there is a lack of sandboxing and site isolation. This could be fixed up to a certain point but anyways it would be more insecure than chromium.
Firefox uses literally the Chromium sandbox on Linux, they have for years.
https://grapheneos.org/usage#web-browsing
Do you have a more recent article describing that? 2022 is old but I’ve not seen anything backing up your claim either
To the dumbass downvoters: why does lemmy hate the concept of backing up claims so much? There are two conflicting claims, one that says Linux sandbox is bad, another saying its fine. I’ll believe the first person who can actually back their shit up. Nobody should believe either claim until then. This isn’t complicated.
that’s why ironfox is so valuable
The problem with iron fox is that it’s so hardened about privacy that it breaks functionality l, for example you can’t even use add-ons if you don’t enable it first, it is disabled by default…
Waterfox is a better choice in that regard.
I like waterfox but ESR based
Bullshit (except maybe on Linux, I have no idea if they’ve fixed their shit there)