Krugman was broken, so he is awoken, and hath at last bespoken.

Should have gone by OOP’s identity instead of the reactionary propaganda which they posted. Will move post there!

Bonus:

Based on

Malus:

I have screenshots of neo-Nazis in Kavernacle’s Twitter feeds

An authentic quote by FD Signifier in “Debating Zionism and ‘Jewish Supremacy’ ft. F. D Signifier, Lil’ Bill, and Deculturation”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0nR9Fcrp1yg&t=914s

Kav is an Irish-British leftist political commentator.

This is the transcript of what Kav said in the excerpt Bree’s posted & paraphrased:

But instead, you [FD Signifier] go to this podcast and start saying sh!t like this trying to discredit me. And also in your campaign against Bal Empanada, even if you’re not saying we’re the same, your criticism of him is calling him a Nazi 4chan groper. You’re calling him a 4chan leftist and then throwing me in there as well, right?

And although I’ve defended him on some things, I’ve outlined in this video how we’re not the same. He’s criticized me a lot. His fans are unhinged. They’re in my mentions as well, criticizing me all the time. I’m not agreeing with him on that stuff.

But if you’re going to make the critique of my content, stop being lazy. Go and watch it. And also, while you’re at it, maybe educate yourself better on anti-semitism and Palestine and stop tone policing the left and stop hiding behind identity politics. It doesn’t fvck!ng matter that we’re both white. Like, it really doesn’t. Are you seriously going to say we can’t say this stuff because we’re white people?

But that’s what I mean. Like, he’s uncomfortable because we’re white people and white people are the historic oppressors of Jews, right? So now we’re saying Jewish supremacy. That must mean we have some sort of like Nazi particles flying around. Not that we’re just calling a spade a spade.

Like Muhammad el-Kurd said, it’s not his fault. It’s not his fault they waved the Star of David. It’s not his fault they base so much of their apartheid law on the Torah. It’s not his fault.

And it’s not any individual Jew’s fault. We’re not blaming all Jews the same way he doesn’t. If a Jew is against the state of Israel, that is another person who’s against the state of Israel.

We welcome you into the movement.

Links to watch:

• Kav’s full video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2BLClJmRZA
• Relevant excerpt: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2BLClJmRZA&t=3507s

Malus: Google translates michaelbenyossef’s comment: “את תצליחי בסוף. ואז החיבור לה׳ יהיה אפילו חזק יותר 🙏 תהיי חזקה” from Isnotraeli Hebrew conlang into English as "You will succeed in the end. And then the connection to God will be even stronger 🙏 Be strong"🤢🤮🫩😒

Done!

@AezzieUwU knows Trump incites his followers to mass-murder trans ppl [1]. I think they are baiting @netnamelilremus to openly admitting to wanting to mass-murder trans ppl even more clearly.

Worse, he falsely claims that his sister’s being transgender resulted from her being r*ped as a child [1].

Graham Linehan is a man, thus equivalent to one of the non-Jewish Zionists (overwhelmingly Christians).

Malus: “Hamas is anti-imperialist, it’s an anti-imperialism that indulges in unacceptable extremism and violence against civilians.”

Are they actually a first-worlder?

Yes. BadMouse is a Brit.

Obligatory:

Another day, another Zionist liar intentionally misrepresenting sources.

OOP lives in Australia [1], now (2026 May) proclaims themself an individualist anarchist [2], and in the past (2025 July) proclaimed themself an anarchist communist [3].

They’re a self-righteous vegan [2] and selectively contigently misanthropic against leftists [4] and advocates for animals more than humans [5].

They wants common ownership of land yet no land back to indigenous peoples [6] [7] [8].

They also “advocate[s] for the October 7 victims slightly more” [9] [10] by spreading atrocity propaganda against the Palestinian resistance [11].

Malus: They opposes Marxism [12], especially the fact that capitalists exploitatively appropriate surplus values created by workers [13].

Murray Rothbard), the same Austrian school economist who recommended a “flourishing child market.”

For the curious, source is chapter 14 “Children and Rights” of the 1982 book The Ethics of Liberty by Rothbard

Quote:

Now if a parent may own his child (within the framework of non-aggression and runaway freedom), then he may also transfer that ownership to someone else. He may give the child out for adoption, or he may sell the rights to the child in a voluntary contract. In short, we must face the fact that the purely free society will have a flourishing free market in children. Superficially, this sounds monstrous and inhuman. But closer thought will reveal the superior humanism of such a market. For we must realize that there is a market for children now, but that since the government prohibits sale of children at a price, the parents may now only give their children away to a licensed adoption agency free of charge. This means that we now indeed have a child-market, but that the government enforces a maximum price control of zero, and restricts the market to a few privileged and therefore monopolistic agencies. The result has been a typical market where the price of the commodity is held by government far below the free-market price: an enormous “shortage” of the good. The demand for babies and children is usually far greater than the supply, and hence we see daily tragedies of adults denied the joys of adopting children by prying and tyrannical adoption agencies. In fact, we find a large unsatisfied demand by adults and couples for children, along with a large number of surplus and unwanted babies neglected or maltreated by their parents. Allowing a free market in children would eliminate this imbalance, and would allow for an allocation of babies and children away from parents who dislike or do not care for their children, and toward foster parents who deeply desire such children. Everyone involved: the natural parents, the children, and the foster parents purchasing the children, would be better off in this sort of society.

I was impressionably gullible and believed in anti-AES propagandae.

living in a successful socialist state is one if the best forms of inoculation from Anarchism

Tho’ not 100% effective, there’s an infinitesimally tiny minority Vietnamese who are anarchists. After immigrating to the US, I became an anarchist as well, and remained so for more than one decade, tho’ recently I’ve abandoned anarchism and become just a communist (not specifically ML).

the OOP is a notoriously anti-ML anarchist who strawmans Communists and other “authoritarian leftists” as social democrats

I never interacted with him (tho’ I have a YT account) because I’m not a sophist like him. I simply rolled my eyes and vocalized: “So what? Communists liberated Vietnam my birthplace from French colonialism, successfully defeated US imperialism, and have been and are still improving the Vietnamese people’s quality of life. Anarchists do neither.”

Socialists are not interested in empowering small business owners at the cost of the working class.

Small capitalists are still capitalists; their class interests and those of the working-class’ are antitthetical to each other. So it was, is, shall be not at all surprising when small business owners & others in the middle class, out of class interests, did, do, and will support fascism.

I don’t think this is actually that bad an idea.

I also think OOP’s idea is good. That’s why I’ve posted his posts in this community and pointed out what likely had motivated him, namely: that decaying US capitalism is responsible for functional illiteracy in the majority of US adults.