Yeah, I think dems don’t take equality seriously at all. The cultural equality stuff they parrot is to distract from the fact that they’ll never do anything to change the biggest inequality in the US, wealth and class. Even if it’d Freudian, in that they can point and say “see there? I want an equitable society” while ignoring the wealth inequality that is, statistically speaking, doing well for the college educated base they now encompass.

Almost like Clinton should have run a real campaign in MI😃. Stop running unpopular candidates and blaming it on greens. How embarassing lol.

Haha preach

Blood sugar can be too high as well.

You do you, internet stranger.

Like honestly this whole thing, my answer included, is pointless. Would you like to talk about it, in that case fine. If not, why don’t we try to stop trying to find fucking catharsis by burning strangers online. The world sucks right now, shouting at each other won’t fix that. I stand by my initial comment, and again, we can talk about it or not. After that my answer was as childish as theirs.

Oh cool, that makes it ok then👍

Are you 12?

The concept of Democrats doing helpful and useful things is utterly laughable. Straw-men for EVERYONE!!!

But she’s working night and day on a ceasefire deal…😂

🥲

Does policy not largely define the “geometric distance” between candidates?

“Holy shit this femboy has great legs” said I to my wife.❤️

I know Steve!

In our healthcare system they’re talking about refusing non emergent treatment for people without insurance until they get Medicaid, which can apparently take a month. This would save about 20million, which is strikingly close to what Propublica reports the system pays in executive compensation. In other words, if the money is THAT important, we have a way to save that money without literally denying cancer care (time is a factor). But reduction in executive expenses isn’t on the table. Fuck these high earning sociopaths.

And how does a libertarian justify a billion dollar baleout when silicon valley bank went insolvant.

But definitely call her that :-)

Don’t call her that!

Oh, the IOF said it? Must be true 😂. The only thing they say concretely and sourced in the article is that he worked at a “pro Hamas” media outlet (can’t speak to this claim, but remember all the other things the IOF has claimed are Hamas), and that he wrote a piece for Al Jazeera.

Disregarding all that. Assuming that this guy was a journalist who was also a gun carrying member of Hamas and held actual hostages in his house, does that say anything about the record number of journalists that have been assasinated by the IOF?

I think it pretty clearly doesn’t.

Well Lucas saw it as an allagory for resistance against empire so there may be something in there to muddy up simple conservatism. Nothing is simple.