Tarquinn2049

Run it with Virtual desktops VDXR runtime. Not only does it run better, but it skips a step in your setup time. No need to have SteamVR running at all. Euro truck sim had a bug 2 patches ago that was messing with VR, their menu redesign also fixed it. If your truck sim games aren’t showing up in VD’s game launch tab, use the -openVR launch command instead of -Oculus launch command. That should populate it in that list.

Does the 3D depth not add much for you? It always bothered me that most people don’t seem to care about 3D… every time it started to come back again, it always fizzled out and got harder and harder to find. With VR, I’m so happy that it should finally be here to stay.

But honestly, even when just recreating multiple flat screens in VR, being able to place them at 20 feet away for the comfort of my eyes, and then size them up until they still look like a desktop mounted triple monitor solution at first glance, until you realize how far away they are. All that for about 500$ on quest 3, or 1000$ if you want to go with Quest pro and still use all your physical setup with it. Quest pro is not a fully immersive headset, it’s designed for people who still want to see their keyboard or whatever is in that same general location. The perfect headset to blend with already having a physical cab recreation.

I wouldn’t recommend anything less than a Quest 3 or Quest pro. Having used everything before that, pancake lenses are the number 1 most important breakthrough in VR so far. Yes, even counting that one you just thought of that seems like it should be more important. Lol. Ok fine, maybe some other parts were a bit more important, like accurate head tracking and all the low-latency work… but pancake lenses are right up there, just behind the fundamental, foundational breakthroughs.

I do have to ask, when you say “bother setting up the headset”, is yours not just a “put it on and launch the game”. What sort of set up?

So, because I already spent lots of money, I wanted to honor it by spending more money. Hehe.

I don’t know. Whatever. It’s certainly not for me. I get doing all that before good VR was an option. But now a VR headset and a motion rig feels like a way better use if you want to spend alot of money on it. And no motion rig if you don’t. But, I can comfortably wear VR for 10+ hours and didn’t even have to train away motion sickness or anything. So, of course, VR seems great to me.

There is also the option of a Quest pro. I don’t know exactly what a multi-monitor setup like this costs, but a brand new Quest pro is 900$. It’s purpose built for blending your physical work space with a virtual one. Loading up 4 virtual monitors, or one really wide curved one if you prefer that, and putting them/it 20 feet away for eye comfort is also an option if you don’t want stuff to be 3D/harder to run.

That’s awesome. Buncha nerds, hehe. I miss when games were made by a handful of friends, sure sometimes it meant they leaned a little too heavily on a mechanic that only played well in their opinion and stuff like that, the upsides were worth it though.

I really don’t understand picking that over VR. VR gives you so many more options for way cheaper.

I mean, I certainly wouldn’t assume it was more than just the one thing yesterday, if you did, why didn’t you warn anyone? But now that it has been 2 things, you can certainly bet every other device is checked or chucked for a while. Fool me twice…

Yeah, I’m not sure. People are calling it highlighting, but it doesn’t fit any reasonable pattern to have been manually highlighted. Is there some sort of bad automated highlighting? Or just someone still learning what highlighting is even used for. Or is it just some sort of style thing?

As long the player is open to whatever the DM decides their characters history is, or they have collaborated on an outline or even a detailed history the other players just don’t know about, that is all fine and can be really fun for everyone.

If they are doing it with no heads up and are not going to play along with whatever the DM decides happened in their past, then no. But when it comes to DnD, I normally let stuff play out and only stop play if something is clearly going poorly, or might make other players more uncomfortable than they are willing to be. I only play with friends, so things rarely end up being anything close to the worst they theoretically could have gone, socially.

I’m definitely gonna write some of these down and try to work them in. But some of them have earned their 0 uses so far.

Ooh nice. I’ll take it. It may not be the dream, but it’s what you wake up to after dreaming, and that’s really all you can hope for.

I’m pretty sure a game as I described would only be a cult classic at best. Can’t expect that kind of passion project in our financial climate.

Some of the near zero but not zero combinations don’t make a lot of sense to not just be zero.

Like dumbbag, scumhat, dipclown… I don’t know about you, but those ones colored as “thousands of uses” doesn’t seem right to me. Unless it was open so far as to search for those words used back to back and not specifically attached in any way as implied.

But yeah, there are so many combinations that seem way too far into the orange to make sense to me. I’m curious to see the actual numbers the graph was built with.

I think the goal was to tell the story in a way that doesn’t seem as familiar to point out just how crazy it is that we have become used to these headlines every single day.

Just saying elon musk tweeted a dumb thing is whatever. But keep in mind who he actually is despite… who he is.

Yeah, the issue is calling it “replacement” instead of a demographic shift. The replacement part makes it feel like a bad thing. It’s just a natural shift that is no longer as artificially repressed by those in power as it used to be.

I really liked the Tokyo Xtreme racer games. They are still probably the best car RPG games. I would love to see what someone could do now in the same vein. Even tokyo xtreme never got quite as crunchy or difficult as I would have liked.

I want to go so far as to be like a tactical survival style game, where you are out there earning a living wage from daily(nightly) car racing, and putting most of it back into your car. Just the repairs and maintenance alone being a bar you have to meet and beat every day on average to stay afloat, and then you can think about upgrades after.

It basically takes an environment like that for it to matter in a racing game that there are upgrades between the worst and the best. If trying to save up for even one good part wouldn’t be possible without at least some middle parts first.

Meanwhile, could have some “roguelite” elements too in driver experience/skill. The car is only half of what’s winning the races afterall. And even if you really blow it at some point and your car is fucked and you need to salvage and pull together what you got and go back to a cheaper car to maintain/repair, you’ll still have all the experience/skill your character personally gained helping it go a little smoother this time.

Your story would be verifiable. Unless somehow only one fake bill slipped into a ream. But generally if it put out one fake bill, it’ll have alot more inside. It’s not like they are loaded one bill at a time. And generally they get fresh printed currency when possible, to reduce the chance for jams.

The way laws like this tend to be enforced is generally either someone has to report you or you have to cause a problem and then are also retroactively charged for the other infractions. So if you are already doing your best to be safe and not annoying, that’s all you can do. Fly under the radar.

Wow, those two options look damn near identical to me. I wonder what makes it over 70% confident it’s one and only 9% confident it’s the other.

It’s not an anti-christian bias. It’s the anti-all religion bias that politics is literally supposed to have. You can be religious in politics, as long as it doesn’t actually affect the decisions you make for everyone.

I would assume reasonably and reservedly, rather than jumping the gun. It’s certainly how I responded. Not sure what you really mean to ask though.

If you mean about conspiracy theories, I can pretty much assure they waited to see what was actually the case rather than believe the first thing they heard.