• 0 Posts
  • 68 Comments
Joined 1 month ago
cake
Cake day: September 5th, 2026

help-circle












  • Well, they do have been warning people to stay away from that airport. But civilian ‘mass casualty events’ are the imperialists M.O, so I hope more details emerge. As a general rule, whenever there is a false-flag, suspiciously little details emerge after the fact. See Nordstream, the random rocket towards the UK Indian ocean base (diego garcia I think its called?), or others in history. IF this truly is Ansarallah, I expect all details will be published and that the media will make a big fuzz. If we only get the media fuzz however…thats usually the sign.

    Also I imagine this will generate 1000% more attention than the Saudi airstrike on the maternityward some days ago.



  • public transportation is not always a viable option if you live outside of the big cities.

    Yea that’s the case here as well. I am just fortunate to live in an apartment in a city with good personal finances and own no car, so I am sheltered from most expenses that might rise as immediate consequence of the war: gas and mortgage. I feel like people have grown indifferent to the ever rising costs since the pandemic. In my conversations with people I mostly get shrugs or surprised looks when I ask if they think the current Iran war is a driving factor behind costs. So it was more this sentiment I was thinking of.


  • Europe in particular is in a really bad situation because the US just forced Europe to release diesel reserves to stabilize market prices before midterms. But once that’s gone, and prices actually start climbing that’s when the trouble starts.

    Of for sure, I just spoke personally. Even then, prices have continued to rise so much since the pandemic that it’s still difficult to know what is the cause of incremental inflation or fluctuations of diesel prices. I imagine that the conflict will be felt much more as reserves dry up.

    The countries I expect to adopt are in the Global South.

    Definitely, I can’t help but feel that our current decade is the deciding shift and that the decades to come really will belong to the “third world” this time. We’ll see on the 100 year mark of the Bandung conference how well we fared, but I am cautiously optimistic.


  • Nicely written as always. Admittedly, the squeeze has not been felt very much here in Europe so far (I don’t drive so have no notion of increased gas prices), but I reckon that will change during winter. With no end in sight to the western aggression in west Asia, it will be interesting to see how the things will go come new years in, especially, Germany and UK who are very fuel/export dependent.

    My hope is that this is a turning point for EU where they see that

    Now that oil is scarce, countries that have chosen non-alignment are the ones that are best positioned to weather the crisis.

    but I fear (and am almost certain) that they are structurally in way to deep to even consider diversifying and approaching China. Will be interesting to see if a few breakout nations (like Spain) can at least muddle the waters a little.

    I recently read some transcripts and reports from the original Bandung conference and was saddened by the world we could’ve had. Now instead the Sahel states and BRICS have to start all over, in even more hostile conditions than what they had in the 50s. Well, at least now there is no delusion regarding the lengths the imperialists are willing to go, and they have a manufacturing powerhouse in China which hopefully can accelerate their development at record pace.



  • The State guaranteeing employment is still not enough, because the Keynesian systems post ww2 tried just that and began to creak and break in the 1970s leading to the neoliberal counter-reform faction winning power.

    Oh totally, a welfare state cannot function within capitalism long term regardless. I kind of clumsily tried to make the point that it is at least manageable during periods of industrialization and growth, because there are jobs. Obviously under capitalism this will never happen long term.

    It /should/ be easy to refute but whether or not we have the right conditions to have our ideas take hold is another thing entirely.

    Most people think only of the spectrum represented in the parliament. So when they think “communists” or “leftists” they think of whatever succdem party the media is currently calling “far-left”, and then nothing else. So we are already set back enormously because they keep making things worse (and moving to the right). In the minds of most people, they have to choose between eroding welfare services + higher taxes vs eroding welfare services + lower taxes, and obviously most are gonna choose the latter.


  • Why would workers trust you if you are actively trying to make their lives worse and take away their hard won rights and social safety nets?

    I don’t know, seems to work just fine for the bourgeois in the Nordics. Write a book about how you think “the welfare state = apartheid” and say that it is your life’s mission to dismantle it, and you’ll become prime minister with a majority government (Sweden).

    To me it seems the issues of the welfare state stem from de-industrialisation and the ever so common economic crises arising from capitalism. A welfare state cannot function in capitalism unless there is also continuous job creation. It makes no sense that an ever decreasing portion of the working population needs to fund the income of others who want to work but cannot, because the jobs don’t exist. The state should handout “welfare” insofar that it guarantees you a right to work. Otherwise it will just spiral as it does now in the Nordics: no jobs --> more people utilizing the social safety net --> more strain on the welfare state --> higher taxes for the workers --> etc.