If trunk wanted to take a hard turn into Longism, I think it could work for him, and would appeal to him.

It would still have literally every problem longism had, but that’s not worse than this.

Oh. Yeah we haven’t even re-unified Ireland and kicked the English out here.

We live in the anthropocene, and live in society whose purpose is, near as I can tell; the abuse of children.

So in a way it is.

Yeah. Just build better air conditioners.

Why do you? I’m saying ‘even if’. Read what I said, you fucking violently illiterate bag of dog shit. Fucking. Learn. To. Fucking. Read.

Voting will never fix this. Americans elected the green climate change president in 2000. The establishment ruled the oil-cia failson got the job.

The problem with climate change models:

Climate science is science. It works on what’s tested confirmed and very known. It is a method for being very sure and understanding pretty deeply before you speak confidently, and revising that confidence when necessary.

What’s going on is unprecedented total destructing of an unfathomably complicated planetary scale systems from physics its difficult to model. We barely predict accurate weather a week out with computers, and that was before we scrapped all the sensors (defunded NOAA) and tasked all the super computers to making bespoke CSAM.

So there’s a lot of things we don’t think to include in the model, a lot of interactions we didn’t even know were happening or how they would fuck up, and a lot of runaway feedback loops we didn’t gave data to model. And a scientist with integrity can only add what they know is there. They can’t add an allowance for ‘shit we didn’t think of, and we never think of everything’ even though they reliably do not think of everything, because we’re constantly surprised by things we couldn’t model or didn’t think of previously. The amount of co2 released when permafrost thaws was not included in older models, and if it had been we couldn’t have known how much there would be before it started.

So the models, even the pessimistic models, will never be as grim as reality. They can’t be. They’re based on what we already know for sure, and cwe are looking at a flock of black swans’ is not something one can model with scientific integrity. The disaster is moving too fast, with over a century’s momentum.

This is an immediate existential threat, and if you do not exercise all violence your conscience permits against the people most responsible concluding every billionaire, extraction exec, congressman, right wing politician (jimbob down the street who rolls coal and works on an oil rig doesn’t move the needle. Fuck him, but he won’t move the needle. dont take his murder from the kids he’s raping)

Live in the waste heat from a nuclear power plant?

Still not gonna do anything about it.

So what did you mean? Multiple days and dozens of comments and you can’t say

Are you a troll, or genuinely that stupid?

But there are no people in one if those groups. Its just corporations.

And ownership is kind of nonsense.

A better as-farce than we deserve.

I was describing a fiction novel from 1993 that every Facebook product is based on.

Sorry I’m pretty sure I didn’t say either if those things and don’t consider you worth it if I did. Consider ways to minimize your impact on the world.

Deciding who owns things doesn’t help that happen.

The system can only do Nazi shit. Tried voting for. Non Nazis. They were ratfucked in primaries, not allowed to take office, or turned around and did the same old Nazi shit but more eloquently. You keep telling me not voting is choosing repression. Imtelling you I choose statistically likely revenge.

if everything else about it weren’t a nightmare shit show

Capitalism. You mean capitalism. I don’t really care if stopkillinggames or the sierra club lobby.

Are they hungry/dying of not having medicine? If so; mission accomplished. Do they want me to keep making more?

You’re right though; what’s important and resilient in the face of social collapse is a block chain based ordering of who owns what.