Hey. Shut up. Again.

You’ll never unfuck shit.

I would also ask the pushy neighbor if he was specifically planning on buying Wyze cameras for this. They’ve had multiple security problems in recent years.

I have Wyze cameras and can confirm. On a handful of occasions, I’ve opened my app to thumbnails or livestreams of places I do not recognize. I’ll probably change this up at some point when I can afford to replace them and get a better hang of Home Assistant.

And yooooooouuuu read it! Behold our hubris and bask in our rage.

In the aaaaarms of the aaaaangels

What is the name of your religion and how can I make sure my loved ones never join it?

Long live the Pringles cantenna

It’s not a “natural humidifier” why are you clumping those two words into a singular item?

I don’t think I called it a “natural humidifier” anywhere. I called it a “natural dehumidifier,” the same as you did in your original comment.

Also…

The definition and example you’ve chosen addresses an expected reaction. An air conditioner is a dehumidifier. In your chosen example given in that definition on dictionary.com, your original comment would be more akin to saying, “When the fist landed forcefully on his face, it was natural that he was punched in the face.”

You really are intentionally obtuse, you literally explained how an ac naturally dehumidifies that air, but dance around using the proper term since you’ve got it in your head that it was misused, even so far as to ignore a dictionary definition.

I want to either take responsibility for or deny whatever it is you’re saying here, but I’m not sure what you’re saying. This isn’t me trying to throw in a burn by personally attacking you and saying that you don’t know how to communicate. I think I’m just confused by the wording. There are probably millions of other people to whom this makes sense, but I’m probably misreading what you wrote. I believe you’re saying that I’m explaining that an ac “naturally” dehumidifies the air, but I’m avoiding using the word “naturally” because I believe that your use of “naturally” was improper, so much so that I’m willing to ignore the definition of the word naturally. But I don’t want to misconstrue your words because any argument I’d make would be about using a word to define that same word, which doesn’t progress our discourse.

Edit, here’s another

“Without special help or intervention” with the example of “naturally curly hair” is literally describing part of nature: the way that hair grows. If someone wore a curly wig, I don’t think that they’d tell you they have naturally curly hair. When you say that an air conditioner is naturally a humidifier, it sounds the same to me as someone saying that a lever naturally can be used for leverage—yes, that’s why it’s called what it is, because it does what it does. Is an automobile naturally a cart that moves without a horse pushing or pulling it? No, that’s literally what it is. That’s why it’s called an automobile. An air conditioner is called that because it itself is a dehumidifier. It’s not “naturally” a dehumidifier, it was designed to be a dehumidifier. The argument you’re trying to make is the same as Futurama’s joke about Wireless Joe and Pitch-o-mat 5000 being literal versus figurative blernsball machines.

Nothing to do with nature or anything else

What a thought-terminating argument. Nothing to do with nature or anything else! Are you arguing that your words mean what you intended because you said them? Slow down there, Veruca Salts.

but bloviate dude

I don’t know why you’re trying to turn this argument personal, but very well. That’s a good one dollar word! And you used this one correctly, way to go! If you wanted to sound fancy in the first place and the correct word, “literally,” seemed too pedestrian, you could instead substitute “ipso facto.” Since an ac, by the fact of being an air conditioner is itself a dehumidifier.

I normally try not to be so challenging about people misusing words, but you’re just stubborn and self-righteous enough to remind me of my father and that’s gotten under my skin.

Anyway, it’s obvious that neither of us is a linguist not enough of an expert to split hairs like this, since we can’t agree on the meaning of definitions of words. If anyone with some knowledge wants to weigh in and tell me I’m being pedantic, I’ll begrudgingly eat crow.

Are you arguing physics aren’t a part of nature…?

I… Uhhh… I’m not even sure where to start with that… Like, I see the point you’re trying to prove, but in the context of your initial comment, it’s confusing at best. When you see an airplane flying overhead, leveraging Bernoulli’s Principle to seemingly levitate at speed (similar to how air conditioners leverage Bernoulli’s Principle to displace heat outside of the area in which you want your air conditioned, and to evaporate refrigerant inside that area), do you point at it and say “ain’t nature grand?!” Even an ornithopter, which also leverages Bernoulli’s Principle, but uses the natural motion of birds flapping their wings, would still get you odd looks if you called it a part of nature. But I feel like you probably don’t call planes or any other man-made vehicles parts of nature. Likely, you’re phrasing your question around evaporation, a very natural process, but your initial comment didn’t say “evaporation is natural.” So, by taking my comment about air conditioners, boiling it down to being about physics, not the fact that it’s a man-made appliance that you plug in to achieve anything, you’re attempting to frame an argument out of context. But if you want me to follow you down your rabbit hole of bad faith arguments, then here we go! You only specified physics, are you arguing that chemistry isn’t part of nature…?

natural has more than a single definition

I fail to see which one of dictionary.com’s 38 definitions of natural supports calling an air conditioner a natural dehumidifier. While all forms of air conditioning over time have used some form of energy differential to remove hot air, only the modern electric air conditioner (the kind that’s actually called an “air conditioner”) specifically condenses air moisture into a mechanism specifically designed to then remove that moisture from the system entirely. In fact, the original electric air conditioning unit was installed at a publishing company to control the humidity and keep the paper from buckling. The term “air conditioning” was later coined when people experimented with reintroducing moisture into airflow systems, proving that they can truly control the temperature and humidity of an area, a process similar to “water conditioning,” which was a more well-known term.

you’re being intentionally obtuse

If an air conditioner’s primary function is removing moisture from air, it would be just as awkward to call it a “natural dehumidifier” as it would be to call a pitching machine a “natural pitcher.” An air conditioner isn’t “naturally” a dehumidifier, it’s literally a dehumidifier. It’s naturally a white noise machine, or it naturally causes nosebleeds if you run it with the heater on in the winter, or it’s naturally able to be used as a filtration system when you use it with the proper Merv-rated HEPA filter.

Calling an air conditioner a “natural dehumidifier” makes it sound like its purpose is cooling and it just so happens to condense and sink away moisture, but it literally does that by design. Refusing to acknowledge that diminishes the effort, science, and engineering that went into inventing it as an appliance. Hand-waiving that away removes people’s ability to intuitively understand things like sweating (a thing that naturallycools you off) or wet-bulb temperature, which when factoring in global warming means that sweating could eventually not cool you down naturally.

Toilet paper isn’t naturally absorbent, it is designed to be that; paper towel designs don’t naturally prevent layers from sticking together, they are designed specifically for that reason; hard candies aren’t naturally sweet, they’re designed that way. Differentiating is important to demystify rather than confuse the topic.

He never promised that, though. He promised to rid the land of gnomes, an under appreciated linchpin species. He also promised to reveal who has been pissing in the town well. By doing that, the unicorns and fairy dust would return naturally.

What he didn’t mention was that aggressive deforestation had killed all the unicorns and fairies. And even if they did come back, they’d be shot on sight because an endangered species would halt the deforestation and that’s currently profitable. Once the wildfires take out the rest of the enchanted forest, the townspeople will likely die in agony with their dignity stripped away, but that’ll be profitable, too, if they can convince enough people that their support will put them on the survivor’s side!

Even MY anium???

You can cry on my shoulder. It’s hot here and I could use the free water.

I’d argue that hot humid air condensing on a cold stone might be a natural dehumidifier, but I’m not sure that refrigerant being compressed in a high-pressure system and then allowed to rapidly decompress through coils captured in dense arrays of metal fins while a fan blows across them qualifies as a “natural” process.

Anyway, I was just being a little silly about describing an Air Conditioner’s primary function as a natural process.

Then I realized it could come off as a little mean, so I selectively and deliberately misconstrued “dehumidify” in a way to make myself sound like a conspiracy theorist.

Now, let’s put on our foil hats and speculate wildly instead of explaining our comments! THEY want us to fight so that they can take our McRibs!

Seems that way now, but just imagine AI… Once we ChatGPT our investigations, the pirates will all be caught so super-fast. Give us money, please.

“Then they’re gonna grind up the suitcase, which the action alone is worth at least 13¢ per turn of the grinder. That’s approximately *draws numbers with finger on the table* $62Bajillion, and then they’re gonna sell the suitcase powder to children, which children are worth $10,000, so each life destroyed by “carry-on crack,” that’s the street name… Factor in life insurance, media advertising, and college tuition, that’s EASILY $14Bajillion! Finally, those shoes are gonna be sold on eBay, which Air Jordans are probably worth $5000, so that’s $10000 for the single pair of shoes. And, if you’ll look in the room, everyone is wearing shoes! Which is worth another $1600Bajillion!!! We just took $5761Kajillion of drugs off the streets and saved our taxpayers $54Billion! And all at the mere cost of our $400Million annual budget!”

AC… Natural…

Dehum-idifier…

Need I say more?

Hey! Don’t mess with Texas!

We’ll cry if you do.

Looks to me somewhere between two fingers

The joke is that it’s George Michael instead of Princess Diana, but their hair looks similar. I hate to call you out on the internet, but next time you’re gonna be so careless, whisper.

Also, he’s dead. So, it’s pretty much Twilight, too.

1984? Hammer throw will have to suffice then