• DankZedong @lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Such a train would be a massive win for the world. Imagine being able to get from Amsterdam to Barcelona in this train in ±3 hours (including stops, probably). Making it affordable would completely destroy European flights, which is a good thing.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The equatorial circumference of the Earth is about 40,000km. That means this train will theoretically be able to travel from any point on the Earth’s surface to any other point in under 24 hours as long as there’s track. This will be an absolute game changer for building connections across Eurasia, Africa, and the Middle East going forward. It’s going to completely eliminate the need for air travel and largely make shipping obsolete I expect.

      • wopazoo [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think cargo ships are going to be obseleted by trains even in a scenario where all fossil fuels are banned or otherwise unavailable, because ships can take advantage of wind power (sails).

        • ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It might also be advantageous to have several of those massive 200,000+ Gross Register Ton ships retrofitted or built with nuclear reactors, especially if those ships are state operated. There’s really no reason not to when you start to reach sizes as absurd as that. A Nimitz Class Supercarrier is roughly 1/20 to 1/40 the displacement of some of those cargo vessels.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Obsoleted was perhaps too strong a word. As I mentioned in another reply, it’s more about facilitating trade across land routes that are too far from shipping centres to be viable currently.

      • ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe not shipping, the size of those shipping barges is incomprehensible with the sheer amount of tonnage they can carry, and dealing with tariffs, taxes, border inspections, and crossing land borders is a whole hassle in and of itself that a lot of countries and companies won’t want to deal with.

        Plus, North America, South America, Oceania, and massive economies such as Japan are still separated from the rest of the world and inaccessible to rail.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fair, I don’t expect shipping to go away entirely. It’s worth noting though that you still have to get goods on and off the ship, which is done by land. So, the bottlenecks end up being in moving things to and from the port, hence why we tend to see big economic centres close to the ports with a fall off as you get fruther from the port. On the other hand, trains have the potential to connect a lot of areas that aren’t close to the water, and kick start economic development in places where it wasn’t cost effective previously.

          And of course, in the context of US trying to contain China, it makes a lot of sense for China to focus on creating economic routes through land where US can’t interfere with them.

    • starkillerfish (she)@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      looking forward to the future when continental travel is completely done by train! would be also a big win for my older relatives who cant travel by plane due to medical conditions. there are just so many pros for trains.