When I say used to I mean the days of limewire, napster, and sublimedirectory to name a few. Or IRC or even ICQ.

  • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The dream is still alive in small countries the corporations don’t care about! I sail in vast oceans without VPN.

  • x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I don’t pay for a VPN but I do pay for a debrid. TorBox has a $3/month plan and it allows you to download torrents at 1Gbps from HTTPS endpoints with a no-logs policy.

  • Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    I got a cease and desist letter that forced me to get a lawyer and start court proceedings which stretched over three years, to avoid paying a monthly income in “damages”, for torrenting The Hurt Locker (allegedly).
    So now I use a VPN.

      • Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        The weird part is, it wouldn’t even have mattered if I did it or not.
        I was living with roommates and the contract with the ISP for the house’s internet connection was in my name.
        So according to German law at the time, I was legally on the hook for copyright violations by anyone on the shared WiFi.
        By the time all the legalese letters back and forth were done and the opposing law firm would have had to officially charge me in court, the law had changed.
        The old law would still have technically been applicable for my case, but I guess my push-back with a lawyer, and the risk of a judge being sick of the useless workload, made it too risky to be profitable for the copyright vultures.

    • Don_Dickle@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Ah screw it. This early in the morning you piqued my interest. So yeah why both side keep trying harder?

      • blackbelt352@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        49 minutes ago

        Its the same kind of arms race that cybersecurity is going through, one side creates defenses, the attackers (all color hats) figure out bypasses and exploits, the defenders patch out the exploits, attackers find new exploits, defenders keep reacting, attackers keep finding new exploits, and the cycle keeps continuing. In an attempt to break the arms race, the defenders are going to turn to legislation to make engaging in the arms race illegal unless you’re certified.

        Side note but I’m not making a value judgement on either side, there are defenders protecting bad people and attackers who are justified in their attacks and have released important information out to the public, but protecting your own information from malicious attackers is also super important, stuff like login info to critical infrastructure systems or your financial details so bad actors dont open up a dozen credit cards in your name and destroy your financial reputation needed to survive in this world (fuck credit scores but they are unfortunately part of our reality.)

        Same sort of deal with copyright holders vs pirates, copyright holders are trying to protect what is legally theirs, and pirates are trying to bypass that. (Again no moral arguments here, this is just the nature of the conflict). Pirates gain access, copyright holders create more hurdles to the content, pirates gain access again, copyright does the same thing. Eventually they just keep throwing more legislation at the war to make privacy becomes increasingly expensive through the courts. At the end of the day, unlike cybersecurity, this piracy war wouldn’t exist if every piece of media created was commodified for massive profit. Steam is evidence of that.

  • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Doesn’t cost me anything. I’ve never paid for a VPN. You don’t really need it unless you’re in a country that firewalls you.

    • netvor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      or someone who flexes their “downloading skills” on everyone they meet.

      many years ago a colleague of mine tried to flex on me without really knowing my position on ethics of piracy.

      (i have no problem with as long as it’s about enabling access to media and art that would be inaccessible rather than making money. on the other hand, if an artist decides to do Spotify instead of Bandcamp i generally tend to respect their wish and avoid them like the plague.)

      incidentally the same guy complained some months later that he got some notice from police.

  • BartyDeCanter@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    The Piracy Eras:

    1. Pre-DMCA: The golden age of piracy, no one worried about anything. Music piracy was common, video files were way to large to bother with.
    2. Post-DMCA: Possible prosecution from big copyright, but also hard to track individuals down, so not a lot of worry, but a lot of angst about it.
    3. iTunes Music Store: Did more to end music piracy than any legal action. Cheap enough and easy enough that a lot of people stopped bothering. Pirate Bay for video, expect multi-day or week downloads.
    4. Torrent tracking/poisoning and ISP consolidation: More prosecutions against small pirates put more of a damper on it.
    5. Cheap Streaming: Did to everything what iTMS did to music piracy
    6. Expensive Streaming: Now. Bringing back pirates, but people are more cautious due to 4.
    • VibeSurgeon@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Here in Sweden the launch of Spotify was the step that basically killed music piracy overnight. They even had the creator of uTorrent working on building the service, interestingly enough. I believe I downloaded my last song the day before I got a closed beta account.

    • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 hours ago

      One thing I think is worth mentioning (US specific), there was a period in the 2000s with a lot of prosecutions, but then industry groups switched tactics to pushing ISPs to do enforcement with mass copyright letters, and ceased actually bringing lawsuits against small pirates for the most part. People are normally more worried than they need to be.

      • BartyDeCanter@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Oh definitely. And it really depends on your ISP. Before the ISP consolidation it took enough work that sending out those letters to every small local ISP that they wouldn’t bother for Jane Rando who downloaded a few episodes here and there. Now that (in the US at least) most people use one of two or three ISPs who all have a cozy corporate relationship, it’s harder to fly under the radar. But if you have a good privacy-forward ISP it’s not a worry.

        • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 hours ago

          It basically means you need a VPN to torrent because if you rack up enough letters they might shut off your internet, but there’s a big distinction between those letters and a lawsuit, they are way closer to just a scare tactic. Their text suggests a lawsuit might be a followup possibility, but that isn’t really true.

      • HeHoXa@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        12 hours ago

        That does not dissuade the keepers of the old ways who know the agony and triumph of whole series downloads spanning months, watching that extra green pixel light up as another random chunk came through day after day until finally the progress bar became whole.

        … and then it’s in fucking Spanish

      • iocase@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Yeah you’re right and the only secure method I know of is Tor hidden services which never exit the network itself. Both you and the server will never know where the other is. It’s kind of like an anonymous dead drop in a park between a spy and their handler.

        I2p is another good system to use for torrenting as well it’s just slow as balls (might be better now?) but you don’t need a VPN for that either since it uses garlic routing inspired by Tor’s onion routing.

      • Gold_E_Lox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        14 hours ago

        it is a US military program, so yes, they run nodes as honeypots.

        this is way to valuable to be used against pirates though.

        • x00z@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          The good thing is that it’s in the US military’s interest to actually keep it private and secure though.

  • BurgerBaron@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Canada is still a piracy safe haven, I don’t use VPN. I get funni letters sometimes and laugh at them. Prosumer reseller ISP don’t give a dang. Penalty caps are so low that it’s basically malicious compliance at the Federal level, so nobody gets sued because there’s no money in it for the copyright trolls. Just have to avoid dealing directly with the telecom mafia: Rogers, Shaw, Telus.

    Tbh I use direct download as a source more than torrents these days. There’s a lot of free hosts now that aren’t painful to use like in the past when you needed to pay a subscription to some company like Rapidshare to get anything done on sites like Warez-bb.

  • Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I got a 1900€ bill that I had to hire a lawyer to fight, so now all my devices wear a condom to hit the internet no matter

    • Aetherial@nord.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Lars Ulrich, the only Dane I never liked. Most Danes are agreeable but Lars had someone piss in his baby bottle and he never got over it.

      • fleem@piefed.zeromedia.vip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        (this is coming from a kid who thought they were awesome until i started playing drums myself)

        that and he’s a fuckin glorified metronome. terrible drummer.

        to be that talentless and still bitching about napster…

        yeah 12 year old me got the fuck over some lame ass metallica

        • Aetherial@nord.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 minutes ago

          If he ever made a local appearance, as a fellow Dane I would ask why he was ruining the scenery by showing his face in such a beautiful part of the country. He’s not only a great example of why P2P is more than just people wanting free shit, he also made a pretty good case that money can’t buy happiness or talent

    • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Fuck Metallica. I went to a handful of their shows back in time, but have refused to even listen to a song on the radio since the Napster bullshit.

      • harmbugler@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        58 minutes ago

        Their music sucks now, but I pirate and share it anyway. I don’t listen to it.

        Let me know when they sue Meta or Google for training models on their music.